Nagasawa's Maximal God and the Ontological Argument

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION RELIGIOUS STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1017/s0034412523000458

Peter Millican

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yujin Nagasawa has recently defended two reformulated Ontological Arguments, one adapted from Anselm's ‘Classical’ version and one from Plantinga's ‘Modal’ version. This article explains in detail why both of them fail, and then goes on to present general objections to any Ontological Argument.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

长泽的极大神与本体论论证

Yujin Nagasawa最近为两个重新表述的本体论论证辩护，一个改编自Anselm的“古典”版本，另一个改编自Plantinga的“模态”版本。这篇文章详细解释了为什么他们都失败了，然后继续对任何本体论论证提出普遍的反对意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

RELIGIOUS STUDIES RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Religious Studies is an international journal devoted to the problems of the philosophy of religion as they arise out of classical and contemporary discussions and from varied religious traditions. More than 25 articles are published each year, and the journal also contains an extensive book review section.

期刊最新文献

One goodness, many goodnesses, and the Divine Ideas Imitation Theory Divine contradiction: fascinating but unpersuasive Divine Contradiction: some snippets Divine Contradiction: replies to critics Divine command theory and the (supposed) incoherence of self-commanding