A Retrospective Database Cohort Study Evaluating the Association Between Immune Suppressive Therapy and the Development of Cancer in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Within UK Primary Care

S. W. Y. Ming, Yi Zhou, Mike Smith, J. Were
{"title":"A Retrospective Database Cohort Study Evaluating the Association Between Immune Suppressive Therapy and the Development of Cancer in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Within UK Primary Care","authors":"S. W. Y. Ming, Yi Zhou, Mike Smith, J. Were","doi":"10.33590/emj/22-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: First-line regular systemic treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) in the UK consists of methotrexate, azathioprine, ciclosporin, or mycophenolate (immune-suppressive therapies [IST]). ISTs have been associated with malignancy, hence the need for evaluation for the relationship to the risk of developing cancer.\n\nMethod: This retrospective cohort study utilising the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) followed two cohorts with moderate or severe AD: one prescribed ISTs and one without. A total of 222,978 patients were included. The index date was the date of first IST prescription within primary care for the IST cohort, and the date of first potent topical steroid prescription from January 2001 to May 2021. Cohorts were propensity matched 1:1, resulting in 17,556 patients per cohort. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model the hazard of a cancer diagnosis. A secondary analysis was carried out on a restricted population, excluding patients with other comorbidities where ISTs were commonly prescribed. A further analysis explored the relation between the dose and the association with the risk of cancer.\n\nResults: Both the primary (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.08) and secondary (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93–1.14) analyses did not show a significant difference in the hazard of a cancer code in the IST and non-IST cohorts. The exploratory dose–response analysis showed a higher risk of cancer associated with more prescriptions of IST per year.\n\nConclusion: This study shows that amongst patients with moderate or severe AD, overall IST prescription in primary care is not associated with the onset of a cancer code. However, there is a trend with a higher risk of cancer coding with more prescriptions of IST.","PeriodicalId":90162,"journal":{"name":"European medical Journal. Urology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European medical Journal. Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emj/22-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: First-line regular systemic treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) in the UK consists of methotrexate, azathioprine, ciclosporin, or mycophenolate (immune-suppressive therapies [IST]). ISTs have been associated with malignancy, hence the need for evaluation for the relationship to the risk of developing cancer. Method: This retrospective cohort study utilising the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) followed two cohorts with moderate or severe AD: one prescribed ISTs and one without. A total of 222,978 patients were included. The index date was the date of first IST prescription within primary care for the IST cohort, and the date of first potent topical steroid prescription from January 2001 to May 2021. Cohorts were propensity matched 1:1, resulting in 17,556 patients per cohort. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model the hazard of a cancer diagnosis. A secondary analysis was carried out on a restricted population, excluding patients with other comorbidities where ISTs were commonly prescribed. A further analysis explored the relation between the dose and the association with the risk of cancer. Results: Both the primary (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.08) and secondary (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93–1.14) analyses did not show a significant difference in the hazard of a cancer code in the IST and non-IST cohorts. The exploratory dose–response analysis showed a higher risk of cancer associated with more prescriptions of IST per year. Conclusion: This study shows that amongst patients with moderate or severe AD, overall IST prescription in primary care is not associated with the onset of a cancer code. However, there is a trend with a higher risk of cancer coding with more prescriptions of IST.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项回顾性数据库队列研究评估免疫抑制治疗与英国初级保健中特应性皮炎患者癌症发展之间的关系
在英国,特应性皮炎(AD)的一线常规全身治疗包括甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤、环孢素或霉酚酸盐(免疫抑制疗法[IST])。ISTs与恶性肿瘤有关,因此有必要评估其与患癌风险的关系。方法:利用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)进行回顾性队列研究,随访了两组中度或重度AD患者:一组是处方ist,另一组没有。共纳入222,978例患者。索引日期为IST队列初级保健中第一次IST处方的日期,以及2001年1月至2021年5月第一次有效的局部类固醇处方的日期。队列倾向匹配为1:1,每个队列有17,556例患者。Cox比例风险模型用于模拟癌症诊断的风险。二次分析是在一个有限的人群中进行的,排除了其他合并症的患者,这些患者通常开ist。进一步的分析探讨了剂量与癌症风险之间的关系。结果:两种主要(风险比:1.01;95%置信区间:0.94-1.08)和二级(风险比:1.03;95%可信区间:0.93-1.14)分析未显示IST和非IST队列中癌症代码的危害有显著差异。探索性剂量反应分析显示,每年服用较多IST的患者患癌症的风险较高。结论:本研究表明,在中度或重度AD患者中,初级保健的IST处方与癌症代码的发作无关。然而,随着IST处方的增加,癌症编码的风险也有增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Unmet Need for Patients with Vitiligo is High Diagnostic Evaluation of Hair Loss: A Narrative Review Patient Centricity in Skin Treatments: Global Meeting of Experts in Dermatology EADV 2023 Interview: Shyam Verma Shaping the Future of Coronary Interventions by Highlighting Coronary Anatomy and Reducing Contrast Volume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1