Study on Effectiveness and Tolerability of Adjunctive Perampanel Treatment in Children with Refractory Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy Pub Date : 2023-01-22 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768658
V.K. Gowda, Jincy Thavalenga, R. C. Nanjundappa
{"title":"Study on Effectiveness and Tolerability of Adjunctive Perampanel Treatment in Children with Refractory Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center","authors":"V.K. Gowda, Jincy Thavalenga, R. C. Nanjundappa","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Nearly 30% of patients with epilepsy are refractory to currently available antiseizure drugs (ASDs). Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved perampanel (PER) for patients as young as 4 years, there are limited data on using PER in children. Objective  The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive PER treatment in children with refractory epilepsy (RE). Methodology  This prospective intervention study was conducted in the tertiary care center, in Bengaluru, India from December 2020 to May 2022. PER was added after the failure of a minimum of two ASDs and patients with 6 months follow-up. Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, or none with ≥90, ≥50, and <50% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Adverse events and discontinuation data were used to assess tolerability. Results  Our cohort consisted of 100 cases, a mean age of 9.3 ± 3.8 years and male:female ratio of 3:1. The predominant seizure type was generalized seizures (74%), and concomitant enzyme-inducing ASD use was noted in 27%. Structural etiology was noted in 57%. A total of 76% of participants responded to PER therapy (46% complete response and 30% partial response), while 23% showed no response and 1% discontinued the treatment. Adverse events were observed in 25% of participants (11/25 [44%] drowsiness/sedation, 10/25 [40%] behavioral problems, and 4 [16%] other side effects). Early PER add-on provided a statistically significant benefit over late PER add-on ( p  = 0.01). Response to PER did not differ significantly with the type of seizure and ASD used ( p  > 0.05). Conclusion  Adjunctive PER therapy is safe and effective for treating children with RE. An early add-on of PER is more beneficial in controlling seizures than a late add-on.","PeriodicalId":42559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Nearly 30% of patients with epilepsy are refractory to currently available antiseizure drugs (ASDs). Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved perampanel (PER) for patients as young as 4 years, there are limited data on using PER in children. Objective  The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive PER treatment in children with refractory epilepsy (RE). Methodology  This prospective intervention study was conducted in the tertiary care center, in Bengaluru, India from December 2020 to May 2022. PER was added after the failure of a minimum of two ASDs and patients with 6 months follow-up. Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, or none with ≥90, ≥50, and <50% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Adverse events and discontinuation data were used to assess tolerability. Results  Our cohort consisted of 100 cases, a mean age of 9.3 ± 3.8 years and male:female ratio of 3:1. The predominant seizure type was generalized seizures (74%), and concomitant enzyme-inducing ASD use was noted in 27%. Structural etiology was noted in 57%. A total of 76% of participants responded to PER therapy (46% complete response and 30% partial response), while 23% showed no response and 1% discontinued the treatment. Adverse events were observed in 25% of participants (11/25 [44%] drowsiness/sedation, 10/25 [40%] behavioral problems, and 4 [16%] other side effects). Early PER add-on provided a statistically significant benefit over late PER add-on ( p  = 0.01). Response to PER did not differ significantly with the type of seizure and ASD used ( p  > 0.05). Conclusion  Adjunctive PER therapy is safe and effective for treating children with RE. An early add-on of PER is more beneficial in controlling seizures than a late add-on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级医疗中心辅助Perampanel治疗难治性癫痫患儿的疗效和耐受性研究
背景近30%的癫痫患者对现有抗癫痫药物(asd)难以治愈。尽管美国食品和药物管理局批准perampanel (PER)用于4岁以下的患者,但在儿童中使用PER的数据有限。目的探讨PER辅助治疗小儿难治性癫痫(RE)的疗效和耐受性。该前瞻性干预研究于2020年12月至2022年5月在印度班加罗尔的三级保健中心进行。在至少两例asd和患者6个月随访失败后添加PER。治疗反应分为完全、部分或无(≥90、≥50和0.05)。结论PER辅助治疗儿童RE安全有效,早期加用比晚期加用更有利于控制癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy is an English multidisciplinary peer-reviewed international journal publishing articles on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders, epilepsy surgery, neurology, neurosurgery, and neuropsychology in childhood. These topics include the basic sciences related to the condition itself, the differential diagnosis, natural history, and epidemiology of seizures, and the investigation and practical management of epilepsy (including drug treatment, neurosurgery and non-medical and behavioral treatments). Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to epilepsy are also acceptable. Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy provides an in-depth update on new subjects and current comprehensive coverage of the latest techniques used in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
New-Onset Status Epilepticus in an 11-year-old Patient with Thyroid Autoimmune Dysfunction: A Case Report of Pediatric Hashimoto Encephalopathy Variable Phenotypes in the Same Patient with PRRT2-Associated Disorders Minor Neurological Dysfunction: A Comparative Study in Pediatrics with Different Types of Focal Epilepsy Challenges in the Treatment of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in Female Patients Standardizing the Treatment for Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Quality Improvement Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1