Individual and collective leadership for deliberate transformations: Insights from Indigenous leadership

Irmelin Gram-Hanssen
{"title":"Individual and collective leadership for deliberate transformations: Insights from Indigenous leadership","authors":"Irmelin Gram-Hanssen","doi":"10.1177/1742715021996486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deliberately transforming society toward equitable and sustainable futures requires leadership. But what kind of leadership? While the dominant understanding of leadership often centers on the individual, the concept of collective leadership is receiving increased attention. Yet, the relationship between individual and collective leadership remains elusive and has been given limited attention in the transformation literature. In this study, I explore how leadership is understood and enacted in an Alaska Native community engaged in transforming community systems toward enhanced sustainability. I draw on Indigenous leadership research, organized through four interrelated analytical lenses: the individual leader, leadership through culture, leadership through process, and leadership through integration. I find that leadership in the community can be seen as something simultaneously individual and collective and argue that an Indigenous relational ontology makes it possible to imagine leadership as an “individual-collective simultaneity.” In the discussion, I highlight the connections to emerging theories and approaches within “mainstream” leadership research, pointing to the potential for bridging disciplines and paradigms. For leadership and transformation researchers to engage in this bridging work, we must reflect on and reconsider our assumptions as to what agency for transformation is, with important implications for how we work to support transformations. While “ontological bridge building” creates tensions, it is through holding and working through these creative tensions that we can start to see pathways toward equitable and sustainable futures.","PeriodicalId":92094,"journal":{"name":"Leadership (London)","volume":"135 1","pages":"519 - 541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715021996486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Deliberately transforming society toward equitable and sustainable futures requires leadership. But what kind of leadership? While the dominant understanding of leadership often centers on the individual, the concept of collective leadership is receiving increased attention. Yet, the relationship between individual and collective leadership remains elusive and has been given limited attention in the transformation literature. In this study, I explore how leadership is understood and enacted in an Alaska Native community engaged in transforming community systems toward enhanced sustainability. I draw on Indigenous leadership research, organized through four interrelated analytical lenses: the individual leader, leadership through culture, leadership through process, and leadership through integration. I find that leadership in the community can be seen as something simultaneously individual and collective and argue that an Indigenous relational ontology makes it possible to imagine leadership as an “individual-collective simultaneity.” In the discussion, I highlight the connections to emerging theories and approaches within “mainstream” leadership research, pointing to the potential for bridging disciplines and paradigms. For leadership and transformation researchers to engage in this bridging work, we must reflect on and reconsider our assumptions as to what agency for transformation is, with important implications for how we work to support transformations. While “ontological bridge building” creates tensions, it is through holding and working through these creative tensions that we can start to see pathways toward equitable and sustainable futures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人和集体领导的深思熟虑的变革:来自土著领导的见解
有意识地将社会转变为公平和可持续的未来需要领导力。但什么样的领导力呢?虽然对领导的主要理解往往集中在个人身上,但集体领导的概念正在受到越来越多的关注。然而,个人和集体领导之间的关系仍然难以捉摸,并且在转型文献中得到了有限的关注。在这项研究中,我探讨了领导是如何被理解和制定在阿拉斯加原住民社区从事社区系统向增强可持续性转变。我借鉴了土著领导研究,通过四个相互关联的分析镜头组织:个体领导者,文化领导力,过程领导力和整合领导力。我发现社区中的领导可以同时被视为个人和集体的东西,并认为土著关系本体论使得将领导想象为“个人-集体同时性”成为可能。在讨论中,我强调了与“主流”领导力研究中新兴理论和方法的联系,指出了桥梁学科和范式的潜力。为了让领导和转型研究人员参与到这个桥梁工作中,我们必须反思和重新考虑我们的假设,即转型的代理是什么,以及我们如何工作以支持转型的重要含义。虽然“本体论的桥梁建设”创造了紧张,但通过保持和解决这些创造性的紧张,我们可以开始看到通往公平和可持续未来的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining employee willingness to execute shared leadership: The role of leadership behaviour, gender, age, and context Leading like lions: The model junior officer in the Great War and a critique of present-day mainstream leadership models Imagining aesthetic leadership Letter to Putin Leadership and systems change. The 21st International Studying Leadership Conference 31st July 2023. Call for proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1