{"title":"Halakhic Flexibility and Communal Unity: R. Marcus Horovitz and the Schächtfrage","authors":"J. A. Skloot","doi":"10.1093/mj/kjaa009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Unlike his mentor, R. Esriel Hildesheimer, and his chief antagonist, R. Samson Raphael Hirsch, R. Marcus Horovitz, the “communal Orthodox rabbi” (orthodoxer Gemeinderabbiner) of Frankfurt am Main at the end of the nineteenth century, has received relatively little scholarly attention. Horovitz was both a creative halakhic mind and a passionate communal leader devoted to Jewish unity at a time of intense ideological and political division. This article considers Horovitz’s analysis of the halakhic permissibility of stunning an animal with a blow to the head after slaughter, a practice that was being advanced by animal protection groups in Switzerland and Germany at the time. In a lengthy responsum on the topic, after a thorough reading of halakhic sources, Horovitz argued that the practice was permissible and called for a united Jewish response. The responsum illuminates both the virtuosity of its under-studied author and the complex social and political forces faced by Orthodox rabbis at the time of the Schächtfrage (the controversy over the legality of kosher animal slaughter in German-speaking lands).","PeriodicalId":54089,"journal":{"name":"MODERN JUDAISM","volume":"168 1","pages":"355-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN JUDAISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjaa009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unlike his mentor, R. Esriel Hildesheimer, and his chief antagonist, R. Samson Raphael Hirsch, R. Marcus Horovitz, the “communal Orthodox rabbi” (orthodoxer Gemeinderabbiner) of Frankfurt am Main at the end of the nineteenth century, has received relatively little scholarly attention. Horovitz was both a creative halakhic mind and a passionate communal leader devoted to Jewish unity at a time of intense ideological and political division. This article considers Horovitz’s analysis of the halakhic permissibility of stunning an animal with a blow to the head after slaughter, a practice that was being advanced by animal protection groups in Switzerland and Germany at the time. In a lengthy responsum on the topic, after a thorough reading of halakhic sources, Horovitz argued that the practice was permissible and called for a united Jewish response. The responsum illuminates both the virtuosity of its under-studied author and the complex social and political forces faced by Orthodox rabbis at the time of the Schächtfrage (the controversy over the legality of kosher animal slaughter in German-speaking lands).
不像他的导师,R. Esriel Hildesheimer和他的主要对手,R. Samson Raphael Hirsch, R. Marcus Horovitz,“社区正统拉比”(orthodoxer Gemeinderabbiner)的法兰克福在19世纪末,已经收到相对较少的学术关注。霍洛维茨既是一位富有创造力的伊斯兰教思想家,也是一位充满激情的社区领袖,在意识形态和政治分歧严重的时期致力于犹太人的团结。这篇文章考虑了霍洛维茨对伊斯兰教规允许的分析,即在屠宰后用一击击昏动物的头部,这种做法当时在瑞士和德国的动物保护组织中得到了推广。在对这个话题的长篇回应中,在全面阅读了伊斯兰教法的资料后,霍洛维茨认为这种做法是允许的,并呼吁犹太人团结一致。这个回答既说明了作者的精湛技艺,也说明了东正教拉比在Schächtfrage(关于在德语地区屠宰犹太动物合法性的争议)时期所面临的复杂的社会和政治力量。
期刊介绍:
Modern Judaism: A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience provides a distinctive, interdisciplinary forum for discussion of the modern Jewish experience. Articles focus on topics pertinent to the understanding of Jewish life today and the forces that have shaped that experience.