The Common Instrument: an assessment to measure and communicate youth science engagement in out-of-school time

G. Noam, Patricia J. Allen, G. Sonnert, P. Sadler
{"title":"The Common Instrument: an assessment to measure and communicate youth science engagement in out-of-school time","authors":"G. Noam, Patricia J. Allen, G. Sonnert, P. Sadler","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2020.1840644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been a growing need felt by practitioners, researchers, and evaluators to obtain a common measure of science engagement that can be used in different out-of-school time (OST) science learning settings. We report on the development and validation of a novel 10-item self-report instrument designed to measure, communicate, and ultimately help promote science engagement among youth: the Common Instrument (CI). When administered to 7,521 elementary and middle school students participating in OST science programming, CI items were found to have good psychometric properties – showing strong item discrimination and a range of difficulties, little difference in item functioning by grade-level, gender, or race/ethnicity, good unidimensionality, stability over time, and a small standard error of measurement over a large variety of science engagements. Given its properties, the CI is a reasonable way to collect data on science engagement in a wide range of OST science programs. Common measures, like the CI, that are reliable and valid provide a common language that enables programs to describe their strengths and challenges and make decisions about adapting and improving their approaches. Common measures are also essential for collective impact initiatives that need brief, easy-to-administer instruments to assess progress and impact of their change-making processes.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"44 1","pages":"295 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1840644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT There has been a growing need felt by practitioners, researchers, and evaluators to obtain a common measure of science engagement that can be used in different out-of-school time (OST) science learning settings. We report on the development and validation of a novel 10-item self-report instrument designed to measure, communicate, and ultimately help promote science engagement among youth: the Common Instrument (CI). When administered to 7,521 elementary and middle school students participating in OST science programming, CI items were found to have good psychometric properties – showing strong item discrimination and a range of difficulties, little difference in item functioning by grade-level, gender, or race/ethnicity, good unidimensionality, stability over time, and a small standard error of measurement over a large variety of science engagements. Given its properties, the CI is a reasonable way to collect data on science engagement in a wide range of OST science programs. Common measures, like the CI, that are reliable and valid provide a common language that enables programs to describe their strengths and challenges and make decisions about adapting and improving their approaches. Common measures are also essential for collective impact initiatives that need brief, easy-to-administer instruments to assess progress and impact of their change-making processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同工具:衡量和宣传青少年在校外时间参与科学的评估
从业人员、研究人员和评估人员越来越需要获得一种可用于不同校外时间(OST)科学学习环境的科学参与的通用测量方法。我们报告了一种新的10项自我报告工具的开发和验证,该工具旨在衡量、交流并最终帮助促进青少年的科学参与:共同工具(CI)。当对参与OST科学规划的7,521名中小学生进行管理时,CI项目被发现具有良好的心理测量特性-显示出强烈的项目歧视和一系列困难,项目功能在年级水平,性别或种族/民族方面的差异很小,良好的单维性,随时间的稳定性,以及在各种科学活动中测量的标准误差很小。鉴于其特性,CI是收集广泛的OST科学项目的科学参与数据的合理方法。像CI这样可靠和有效的通用度量提供了一种通用语言,使程序能够描述它们的优势和挑战,并做出关于调整和改进它们的方法的决策。共同措施对于集体影响倡议也是必不可少的,这些倡议需要简短、易于管理的工具来评估其变革过程的进展和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life
期刊最新文献
A pedagogy for success: two stories from STEM Young children’s agency in the science museum: insights from the use of storytelling in object-rich galleries Public education about ShakeAlert® earthquake early warning: evaluation of an animated video in English and Spanish Virtual reality in astronomy education: reflecting on design principles through a dialogue between researchers and practitioners Collaborative capacity-building for collective evaluation: a case study with informal science education centers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1