{"title":"The Common Instrument: an assessment to measure and communicate youth science engagement in out-of-school time","authors":"G. Noam, Patricia J. Allen, G. Sonnert, P. Sadler","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2020.1840644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been a growing need felt by practitioners, researchers, and evaluators to obtain a common measure of science engagement that can be used in different out-of-school time (OST) science learning settings. We report on the development and validation of a novel 10-item self-report instrument designed to measure, communicate, and ultimately help promote science engagement among youth: the Common Instrument (CI). When administered to 7,521 elementary and middle school students participating in OST science programming, CI items were found to have good psychometric properties – showing strong item discrimination and a range of difficulties, little difference in item functioning by grade-level, gender, or race/ethnicity, good unidimensionality, stability over time, and a small standard error of measurement over a large variety of science engagements. Given its properties, the CI is a reasonable way to collect data on science engagement in a wide range of OST science programs. Common measures, like the CI, that are reliable and valid provide a common language that enables programs to describe their strengths and challenges and make decisions about adapting and improving their approaches. Common measures are also essential for collective impact initiatives that need brief, easy-to-administer instruments to assess progress and impact of their change-making processes.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"44 1","pages":"295 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1840644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT There has been a growing need felt by practitioners, researchers, and evaluators to obtain a common measure of science engagement that can be used in different out-of-school time (OST) science learning settings. We report on the development and validation of a novel 10-item self-report instrument designed to measure, communicate, and ultimately help promote science engagement among youth: the Common Instrument (CI). When administered to 7,521 elementary and middle school students participating in OST science programming, CI items were found to have good psychometric properties – showing strong item discrimination and a range of difficulties, little difference in item functioning by grade-level, gender, or race/ethnicity, good unidimensionality, stability over time, and a small standard error of measurement over a large variety of science engagements. Given its properties, the CI is a reasonable way to collect data on science engagement in a wide range of OST science programs. Common measures, like the CI, that are reliable and valid provide a common language that enables programs to describe their strengths and challenges and make decisions about adapting and improving their approaches. Common measures are also essential for collective impact initiatives that need brief, easy-to-administer instruments to assess progress and impact of their change-making processes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life