(Anti)Barbarous Empires: J.M. Coetzee’s Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES European Review Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.1017/S1062798722000539
Vladimir Biti
{"title":"(Anti)Barbarous Empires: J.M. Coetzee’s Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians","authors":"Vladimir Biti","doi":"10.1017/S1062798722000539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress’s blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country’s indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. ‘The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you’, he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee strategically ‘unmoors’ and ‘deterritorializes’ this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the ‘sacrosanct’ territory of history.","PeriodicalId":46095,"journal":{"name":"European Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"9 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798722000539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress’s blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country’s indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. ‘The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you’, he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee strategically ‘unmoors’ and ‘deterritorializes’ this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the ‘sacrosanct’ territory of history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(反)野蛮帝国:j·m·库切在《等待野蛮人》中对偶像的破坏
帝国的运作通常基于这样一个前提:只有帝国中心才是人类历史进步的载体,而帝国边缘则远离这种进步的祝福。根据约翰·麦克斯韦尔·库切的说法,荷兰帝国认为南非是自己的土地,这剥夺了该国土著人民的公民权利。就像欧洲帝国边缘地区的居民一样,他们被降级到类似的历史模糊地带,注定要面对法律上的非法性。与历史进程中受管制的地区不同,他们的例外状态是由帝国官员的心血来潮统治的。他在《糟糕的一年日记》(1977:171)中写道:“安全警察可以进进出出,在没有解释的情况下蒙住你的眼睛,给你戴上手铐,然后把你带到一个不指定的地点,对你做他们想做的事情。”在他的小说《等待野蛮人》(Waiting for the Barbarians)中,库切策略性地“解开”和“去疆域化”了这种例外的边缘状态,将其破坏偶像的效果传播到历史的“神圣”领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Review
European Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Review is a unique interdisciplinary international journal covering a wide range of subjects. It has a strong emphasis on Europe and on economics, history, social science, and general aspects of the sciences. At least two issues each year are devoted mainly or entirely to a single subject and deal in depth with a topic of contemporary importance in Europe; the other issues cover a wide range of subjects but may include a mini-review. Past issues have dealt with: Who owns the Human Genome; From decolonisation to post-colonialism; The future of the welfare state; Democracy in the 21st century; False confessions after repeated interrogation; Living in real and virtual worlds.
期刊最新文献
Is Living Easier With Eyes Closed? Transformed Publication Strategies Economic Resilience in the Centre Development Region, Romania. A Methodological Approach to the 2009–2011 Economic Crisis and Post-crisis Digital Transformations of Public Administration in Countries with Transition Economies Limitations of Fundamental Rights in EU Law: Are Human Rights Absolute?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1