{"title":"(Anti)Barbarous Empires: J.M. Coetzee’s Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians","authors":"Vladimir Biti","doi":"10.1017/S1062798722000539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress’s blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country’s indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. ‘The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you’, he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee strategically ‘unmoors’ and ‘deterritorializes’ this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the ‘sacrosanct’ territory of history.","PeriodicalId":46095,"journal":{"name":"European Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"9 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798722000539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress’s blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country’s indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. ‘The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you’, he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee strategically ‘unmoors’ and ‘deterritorializes’ this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the ‘sacrosanct’ territory of history.
帝国的运作通常基于这样一个前提:只有帝国中心才是人类历史进步的载体,而帝国边缘则远离这种进步的祝福。根据约翰·麦克斯韦尔·库切的说法,荷兰帝国认为南非是自己的土地,这剥夺了该国土著人民的公民权利。就像欧洲帝国边缘地区的居民一样,他们被降级到类似的历史模糊地带,注定要面对法律上的非法性。与历史进程中受管制的地区不同,他们的例外状态是由帝国官员的心血来潮统治的。他在《糟糕的一年日记》(1977:171)中写道:“安全警察可以进进出出,在没有解释的情况下蒙住你的眼睛,给你戴上手铐,然后把你带到一个不指定的地点,对你做他们想做的事情。”在他的小说《等待野蛮人》(Waiting for the Barbarians)中,库切策略性地“解开”和“去疆域化”了这种例外的边缘状态,将其破坏偶像的效果传播到历史的“神圣”领域。
期刊介绍:
The European Review is a unique interdisciplinary international journal covering a wide range of subjects. It has a strong emphasis on Europe and on economics, history, social science, and general aspects of the sciences. At least two issues each year are devoted mainly or entirely to a single subject and deal in depth with a topic of contemporary importance in Europe; the other issues cover a wide range of subjects but may include a mini-review. Past issues have dealt with: Who owns the Human Genome; From decolonisation to post-colonialism; The future of the welfare state; Democracy in the 21st century; False confessions after repeated interrogation; Living in real and virtual worlds.