ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FORAGE PEA ORGANIC PRODUCTION

N. Georgieva, I. Nikolova, V. Dimitrov, D. Dimitrova
{"title":"ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF FORAGE PEA ORGANIC PRODUCTION","authors":"N. Georgieva, I. Nikolova, V. Dimitrov, D. Dimitrova","doi":"10.7904/2068-4738-VII(14)-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented evaluation provides an opportunity to be compared the economic results at different variants of forage pea organic production. From the recommended indicators in economic literature in the current evaluation are calculated following ones: total production (€/da), production costs (€/da), cost price (€/kg), net income (€/da) and rentability (%). In the organic production are used four products: foliar fertilizer Biofа, growth regulator and fungicide Polyversum, bioinsecticides Pyrethrum and NeemAzal which are applied alone and in combination. Comparisons are chemicals (regulator Flordimex, insecticide Nurelle D) that are used in the standard conventional technology. All variants of organic production are cost–effective and enable the realization of good economic results. With the highest economic effect is the application of organic fertilizer Biofa in combination with bioinsecticide Polyversum. In the production of hay, this combination provides profitability of 79.30 %, exceeding the profitability of the standard variant in conventional production (75.00 %); the profitability in grain production (137.05 %) is somewhat lower than that of the conventional variant (140.00 %). Overall, the profitability in different variants of pea organic production for grain and hay is with average values of 109.91 % and 51.67 %, as values for the conventional production are 128.905 and 68.43 %, respectively. Although the result of the economic evaluation is chosen a certain optimal variant of pea organic production, open to future studies remain questions concerning the effectiveness of various organic products in different forms of production organization. Keyword: economic evaluation, rentability, organic production, pea.","PeriodicalId":8682,"journal":{"name":"Banat's Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"6 1","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banat's Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7904/2068-4738-VII(14)-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presented evaluation provides an opportunity to be compared the economic results at different variants of forage pea organic production. From the recommended indicators in economic literature in the current evaluation are calculated following ones: total production (€/da), production costs (€/da), cost price (€/kg), net income (€/da) and rentability (%). In the organic production are used four products: foliar fertilizer Biofа, growth regulator and fungicide Polyversum, bioinsecticides Pyrethrum and NeemAzal which are applied alone and in combination. Comparisons are chemicals (regulator Flordimex, insecticide Nurelle D) that are used in the standard conventional technology. All variants of organic production are cost–effective and enable the realization of good economic results. With the highest economic effect is the application of organic fertilizer Biofa in combination with bioinsecticide Polyversum. In the production of hay, this combination provides profitability of 79.30 %, exceeding the profitability of the standard variant in conventional production (75.00 %); the profitability in grain production (137.05 %) is somewhat lower than that of the conventional variant (140.00 %). Overall, the profitability in different variants of pea organic production for grain and hay is with average values of 109.91 % and 51.67 %, as values for the conventional production are 128.905 and 68.43 %, respectively. Although the result of the economic evaluation is chosen a certain optimal variant of pea organic production, open to future studies remain questions concerning the effectiveness of various organic products in different forms of production organization. Keyword: economic evaluation, rentability, organic production, pea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲用豌豆有机生产的经济评价
提出的评价提供了一个机会,比较不同品种的饲料豌豆有机生产的经济效益。根据目前评价中经济学文献中推荐的指标计算如下:总产量(€/da)、生产成本(€/da)、成本价(€/kg)、净收入(€/da)和可租赁性(%)。在有机生产中使用了四种产品:叶面肥料bioffe,生长调节剂和杀菌剂Polyversum,生物杀虫剂除虫菊和NeemAzal,它们单独或组合使用。比较的是标准传统技术中使用的化学品(调节剂Flordimex、杀虫剂Nurelle D)。所有形式的有机生产都具有成本效益,能够实现良好的经济效益。有机肥Biofa与生物杀虫剂Polyversum配合施用,经济效益最高。在干草生产中,这种组合提供了79.30%的利润率,超过了传统生产中的标准变种(75.00%)的利润率;在粮食生产中的盈利能力(137.05%)略低于常规变种(140.00 %)。总体而言,不同品种豌豆谷物和干草有机生产的平均收益率分别为109.91%和51.67%,而常规生产的收益率分别为128.905%和68.43%。虽然经济评价的结果是选择了某种最优的豌豆有机生产变体,但各种有机产品在不同生产组织形式下的有效性问题仍有待于未来的研究。关键词:经济评价,可租性,有机生产,豌豆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chemical constituents and antibacterial activity of essential oil of Vitex rotundifolia from Southern Vietnam Chemical composition and antibacterial activities of ethanolic extract from rhizomes and aerial parts of Typhonium lineare Hett. and V.D. Nguyen (Araceae) Medicinal plants as sources of selenium and natural antioxidants Changes in elemental composition of Lewis carcinoma tumors in mice due to the supply of water–ethanolic extracts of Artemisia dracunculus and Pastinaca sativa In vitro phytochemical and antibacterial activity of traditional hemorrhoid herbal medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1