Social Science and Social Policy: Epistemology and Values in Contemporary Research

Eugene S. Mornell
{"title":"Social Science and Social Policy: Epistemology and Values in Contemporary Research","authors":"Eugene S. Mornell","doi":"10.1086/443481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we all know, university professors and other members of the academic community are more liberal in their politics and social values than the American people as a whole. As we also know, social scientists, whether in the universities or other educational and research establishments, are more liberal than their colleagues in the humanities, the biological sciences, and the physical sciences, to say nothing of their colleagues in the professions. As a social scientist, I certainly have always considered myself extremely liberal. Therefore, imagine my surprise when I found George F. Willsyndicated columnist for Newsweek and the Washington Post, contributor to the National Review, and well-recognized conservativecriticizing what he described as the liberal assumption that \"what stands between society and happiness is an insufficiency of 'information.' \" My surprise was not with Will's criticism, of course, but with my own agreement and a renewed awareness of my increasing skepticism regarding the usefulness of much social science information (\"data\" or \"findings\") for the development of social policy. Let us acknowledge both Will's rhetorical exaggeration and perhaps even a bit of pessimist chic in some disenchantment with social science research today. Let us also acknowledge the pervasive and continually growing role of social science research in the courts, government agencies, and other social institutions despite some budget losses under recent national administrations. Questions about the relationship between social science research and policy decisions,","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"89 1","pages":"295 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As we all know, university professors and other members of the academic community are more liberal in their politics and social values than the American people as a whole. As we also know, social scientists, whether in the universities or other educational and research establishments, are more liberal than their colleagues in the humanities, the biological sciences, and the physical sciences, to say nothing of their colleagues in the professions. As a social scientist, I certainly have always considered myself extremely liberal. Therefore, imagine my surprise when I found George F. Willsyndicated columnist for Newsweek and the Washington Post, contributor to the National Review, and well-recognized conservativecriticizing what he described as the liberal assumption that "what stands between society and happiness is an insufficiency of 'information.' " My surprise was not with Will's criticism, of course, but with my own agreement and a renewed awareness of my increasing skepticism regarding the usefulness of much social science information ("data" or "findings") for the development of social policy. Let us acknowledge both Will's rhetorical exaggeration and perhaps even a bit of pessimist chic in some disenchantment with social science research today. Let us also acknowledge the pervasive and continually growing role of social science research in the courts, government agencies, and other social institutions despite some budget losses under recent national administrations. Questions about the relationship between social science research and policy decisions,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会科学与社会政策:当代研究中的认识论与价值
我们都知道,大学教授和学术界的其他成员在政治和社会价值观上比整个美国人更自由。我们也知道,社会科学家,无论是在大学还是在其他教育和研究机构,都比他们在人文科学、生物科学和物理科学领域的同事更自由,更不用说他们在专业领域的同事了。作为一名社会科学家,我当然一直认为自己非常自由。因此,想象一下,当我发现乔治·f·威尔是《新闻周刊》和《华盛顿邮报》的联合专栏作家、《国家评论》的撰稿人、知名的保守派人士批评他所描述的自由主义假设,即“社会与幸福之间的障碍是信息的不足”时,我有多么惊讶。当然,令我惊讶的不是威尔的批评,而是我自己的同意,以及我对越来越多的社会科学信息(“数据”或“发现”)对社会政策制定的有用性的怀疑的重新认识。让我们承认威尔在修辞上的夸张,甚至在对当今社会科学研究的一些幻灭中,有一点悲观主义的时髦。让我们也承认社会科学研究在法院、政府机构和其他社会机构中的普遍和不断增长的作用,尽管在最近的国家行政当局中出现了一些预算损失。关于社会科学研究和政策决定之间关系的问题,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Things you should not believe in science What Is a Chemical Element The Origin and Evolution of the Solar System. The mysterious cosmic rays The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1