Survey on oral hygiene measures for intubated patients in Swiss intensive care units.

Claudius Gmür, S. Irani, T. Attin, G. Menghini, P. Schmidlin
{"title":"Survey on oral hygiene measures for intubated patients in Swiss intensive care units.","authors":"Claudius Gmür, S. Irani, T. Attin, G. Menghini, P. Schmidlin","doi":"10.5167/UZH-86326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five to ten percent of all hospitalized patients are treated in intensive care units. The risk of nosocomial infections is inherent in the latter, especially in cases of intubation. In this context, impaired oral hygiene may play a pivotal role. Therefore, the purpose of this survey among representative Swiss intensive care units was to assess the standards and measures taken in this patient collective with reduced oral hygiene. To this end, a questionnaire was sent to 25 institutions which represented all A- and University hospitals in Switzerland as well as all accredited intensive care units in the canton of Zurich according to the register of the Swiss Society of Intensive Medicine. Intensive care units from pediatric departments were excluded. Twenty-one questionnaires were received and evaluated (84%). Only one quarter of all respondents reported having protocols available for preventing ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP). Systemic antibiotic regimens were never performed. Ninety percent reported cleaning the patients' teeth mechanically with a toothbrush. Sixty-seven percent used chlorhexidine as a disinfectant (81% in liquid form). Seventy-five percent of the responding hospitals performed routine oral cleaning procedures three times a day (90% immediately after intubation). In summary, oral prophylaxis was neither standardized nor consistently implemented in the evaluated Swiss intensive care units of the responding hospitals. Only a small proportion had protocols available for preventing VAP, which is in accordance with similar surveys conducted in the US and Europe. Additional and improved measures have to be determined to confirm or optimize prophylactic oral strategies and to create standards and guidelines for this at-risk patient collective.","PeriodicalId":74765,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-86326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Five to ten percent of all hospitalized patients are treated in intensive care units. The risk of nosocomial infections is inherent in the latter, especially in cases of intubation. In this context, impaired oral hygiene may play a pivotal role. Therefore, the purpose of this survey among representative Swiss intensive care units was to assess the standards and measures taken in this patient collective with reduced oral hygiene. To this end, a questionnaire was sent to 25 institutions which represented all A- and University hospitals in Switzerland as well as all accredited intensive care units in the canton of Zurich according to the register of the Swiss Society of Intensive Medicine. Intensive care units from pediatric departments were excluded. Twenty-one questionnaires were received and evaluated (84%). Only one quarter of all respondents reported having protocols available for preventing ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP). Systemic antibiotic regimens were never performed. Ninety percent reported cleaning the patients' teeth mechanically with a toothbrush. Sixty-seven percent used chlorhexidine as a disinfectant (81% in liquid form). Seventy-five percent of the responding hospitals performed routine oral cleaning procedures three times a day (90% immediately after intubation). In summary, oral prophylaxis was neither standardized nor consistently implemented in the evaluated Swiss intensive care units of the responding hospitals. Only a small proportion had protocols available for preventing VAP, which is in accordance with similar surveys conducted in the US and Europe. Additional and improved measures have to be determined to confirm or optimize prophylactic oral strategies and to create standards and guidelines for this at-risk patient collective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士重症监护病房插管患者口腔卫生措施调查。
5%到10%的住院病人在重症监护室接受治疗。医院感染的风险是后者固有的,特别是在插管的情况下。在这种情况下,口腔卫生受损可能起关键作用。因此,本次调查的目的是在瑞士有代表性的重症监护病房中评估这一口腔卫生状况较差的患者群体所采取的标准和措施。为此目的,根据瑞士重症医学协会的登记,向代表瑞士所有a级和大学医院以及苏黎世州所有经认证的重症监护病房的25个机构发送了一份调查问卷。排除了儿科重症监护病房。收到并评估了21份问卷(84%)。只有四分之一的答复者报告有预防通气相关性肺炎(VAP)的方案。从未进行过全身抗生素治疗。90%的人报告用牙刷机械地清洁病人的牙齿。67%的人使用氯己定作为消毒剂(81%为液体形式)。75%的答复医院每天进行三次常规口腔清洁程序(90%在插管后立即进行)。总之,在接受评估的受访医院的瑞士重症监护病房中,口服预防既没有标准化,也没有统一实施。根据在美国和欧洲进行的类似调查,只有一小部分医院有预防VAP的方案。必须确定进一步和改进的措施,以确认或优化预防性口服策略,并为这一高危患者群体制定标准和指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The state of the art of endodontics]. Patients with oral tumors. Part 1: Prosthetic rehabilitation following tumor resection. Nonsurgical treatment of aggressive periodontitis with photodynamic therapy or systemic antibiotics. Three-month results of a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical study. [Infection after dental intervention. Iatrogenic or general medical cause? Case report]. Patients with oral tumors. Part 1: Prosthetic rehabilitation following tumor resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1