Wide cleft between theory and practice: medical students' perception of their education in patient and medication safety.

K. Schmitz, R. Lenssen, M. Rosentreter, D. Gross, A. Eisert
{"title":"Wide cleft between theory and practice: medical students' perception of their education in patient and medication safety.","authors":"K. Schmitz, R. Lenssen, M. Rosentreter, D. Gross, A. Eisert","doi":"10.1691/PH.2015.4836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In medicine today, future doctors are expected to ensure patient safety. Yet medical students often feel uncertain if they can meet these high expectations. This study aims to quantify the perceptions of medical students regarding the actual quality of their education in the fields of patient safety and, in particular, medication safety. A questionnaire was designed and distributed to about 100 upper-level medical students. The students had to respond to 12 questions regarding the following categories: 1) familiarity with patient safety and/or medication safety; 2) personal experience in high-risk clinical situations; and 3) perceived relevance of knowledge in the area of patient and medication Safety for clinical practice. Of the respondents 42.1% and 36.8% had delved into the topic patient safety and medication safety, respectively. In clinical practice 88.2% of respondents had experienced a high-risk situation for patients. Regarding patient safety and medication safety, respectively, 82.9% and 85.3% of the respondents found these topics to be particularly relevant to their clinical practice. This study has shown that there is a measurable discrepancy between the students' perceived quality of their medical education and their feelings that they are well prepared to cope with severe clinical challenges.","PeriodicalId":86039,"journal":{"name":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","volume":"54 1","pages":"351-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/PH.2015.4836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In medicine today, future doctors are expected to ensure patient safety. Yet medical students often feel uncertain if they can meet these high expectations. This study aims to quantify the perceptions of medical students regarding the actual quality of their education in the fields of patient safety and, in particular, medication safety. A questionnaire was designed and distributed to about 100 upper-level medical students. The students had to respond to 12 questions regarding the following categories: 1) familiarity with patient safety and/or medication safety; 2) personal experience in high-risk clinical situations; and 3) perceived relevance of knowledge in the area of patient and medication Safety for clinical practice. Of the respondents 42.1% and 36.8% had delved into the topic patient safety and medication safety, respectively. In clinical practice 88.2% of respondents had experienced a high-risk situation for patients. Regarding patient safety and medication safety, respectively, 82.9% and 85.3% of the respondents found these topics to be particularly relevant to their clinical practice. This study has shown that there is a measurable discrepancy between the students' perceived quality of their medical education and their feelings that they are well prepared to cope with severe clinical challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论与实践的巨大鸿沟:医学生对患者与用药安全教育的认知。
在今天的医学中,未来的医生被期望确保病人的安全。然而,医科学生常常不确定他们是否能满足这些高期望。本研究旨在量化医学生对他们在患者安全,特别是药物安全领域的实际教育质量的看法。设计了一份调查问卷,并分发给约100名高年级医学生。学生们必须回答以下12个问题:1)对患者安全和/或药物安全的熟悉程度;2)临床高危情况的个人经历;3)临床实践中患者和药物安全领域知识的感知相关性。42.1%和36.8%的受访者分别对患者安全和用药安全进行了深入研究。在临床实践中,88.2%的受访者经历过患者的高危情况。在患者安全和用药安全方面,分别有82.9%和85.3%的受访者认为这些话题与他们的临床实践特别相关。本研究显示,学生对医学教育质量的感知与他们对应对严峻临床挑战的感觉存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selective Growth Suppressive Effect of Pravastatin on Senescent Human Lung Fibroblasts. ITGB1 Suppresses Autophagy Through Inhibiting The mTORC2/AKT Signaling Pathway In H9C2 Cells. Association of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Intervention with the Functional Recovery in Convalescent Setting. Comparison of the Antiemetic Effect of Aprepitant/granisetron and Palonosetron Combined with Dexamethasone in Gynecological Cancer Patients Treated with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Regimen. Immunomodulatory Effects of Sinensetin on Macrophage and Cyclophosphamide-induced Immunosuppression in Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1