Court diversion at 10 years: Can it work, does it work and has it a future?

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology Pub Date : 1999-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09585189908402156
D. C. James
{"title":"Court diversion at 10 years: Can it work, does it work and has it a future?","authors":"D. C. James","doi":"10.1080/09585189908402156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ten years after the inception of psychiatric diversion schemes to magistrates' courts in England and Wales, their results are reviewed in order to examine whether they can work, whether in general they do work, and what directions their development should take in future. Both published and extensive unpublished sources are examined. It is concluded that court diversion can be highly effective in the identification and acceleration into hospital of mentally disordered offenders, as one component of comprehensive diversion arrangements. However, most court diversion services are currently inadequately planned, organized or resourced, and are therefore of limited effect. It is argued that the ‘experimental’ phase of court diversion should now be at an end. A central strategy is required, and properly designed and adequately supported court services should be incorporated into, and understood to be a core part of, mainstream local psychiatric provision. Without such action, the future of court divers...","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Abstract Ten years after the inception of psychiatric diversion schemes to magistrates' courts in England and Wales, their results are reviewed in order to examine whether they can work, whether in general they do work, and what directions their development should take in future. Both published and extensive unpublished sources are examined. It is concluded that court diversion can be highly effective in the identification and acceleration into hospital of mentally disordered offenders, as one component of comprehensive diversion arrangements. However, most court diversion services are currently inadequately planned, organized or resourced, and are therefore of limited effect. It is argued that the ‘experimental’ phase of court diversion should now be at an end. A central strategy is required, and properly designed and adequately supported court services should be incorporated into, and understood to be a core part of, mainstream local psychiatric provision. Without such action, the future of court divers...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10年的法庭转移:它能起作用吗?它能起作用吗?它有未来吗?
在英格兰和威尔士地方法院开始实施精神病转移治疗计划十年后,对其结果进行了审查,以检查它们是否有效,总体上是否有效,以及它们未来的发展方向。已发表的和大量未发表的来源都进行了检查。结论:法院分流作为综合分流安排的一个组成部分,对精神障碍罪犯的识别和加速入院具有较高的效果。然而,目前大多数法庭分流服务计划、组织或资源不足,因此效果有限。有人认为,法院转移的“实验”阶段现在应该结束。需要一项中心战略,适当设计和充分支持的法院服务应纳入主流当地精神科服务,并被理解为其核心部分。如果不采取这样的行动,法院潜水员的未来……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
An assessment of interventions following moderate and high scores on the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression risk assessment tool in a forensic mental health unit Do forensic mental health services have an ethical duty towards victims of mentally disordered offenders? Difficulties experienced by Turkish legal support officers in forensic interviews with individuals with autism and/or intellectual disabilities First steps towards a core outcome Set for measuring aggressive behavior in prisoners: a systematic review of current methods Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and PTSD in exonerees: a brief report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1