A comparison of power-analysis-resistant digital circuits

E. Menendez, K. Mai
{"title":"A comparison of power-analysis-resistant digital circuits","authors":"E. Menendez, K. Mai","doi":"10.1109/HST.2010.5513112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power analysis attacks are a common and effective method of defeating cryptographic systems. Many power-analysis-resistant digital circuit techniques have been previously proposed, leaving the circuit designer a myriad of choices without a simple way to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. In this paper, we compare four promising power-analysis-resistant digital logic styles against a standard CMOS baseline. By comparing these techniques side by side in a consistent manner we present a clearer picture of the advantages and drawbacks of each. Results are presented for logic gate area, energy consumption, and power-analysis resistance. We also present a novel test structure suitable for measuring power-analysis resistance of individual logic gates in actual silicon.","PeriodicalId":6367,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2010.5513112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Power analysis attacks are a common and effective method of defeating cryptographic systems. Many power-analysis-resistant digital circuit techniques have been previously proposed, leaving the circuit designer a myriad of choices without a simple way to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. In this paper, we compare four promising power-analysis-resistant digital logic styles against a standard CMOS baseline. By comparing these techniques side by side in a consistent manner we present a clearer picture of the advantages and drawbacks of each. Results are presented for logic gate area, energy consumption, and power-analysis resistance. We also present a novel test structure suitable for measuring power-analysis resistance of individual logic gates in actual silicon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗功率分析数字电路的比较
功率分析攻击是破解密码系统的一种常见而有效的方法。许多抗功率分析的数字电路技术已经被提出,这给电路设计者留下了无数的选择,没有一个简单的方法来比较和对比每种技术的优缺点。在本文中,我们比较了四种有前途的抗功耗分析数字逻辑风格与标准CMOS基线。通过以一致的方式并排比较这些技术,我们更清楚地展示了每种技术的优点和缺点。给出了逻辑门面积、能耗和功率分析电阻的计算结果。我们还提出了一种新的测试结构,适用于测量实际硅中单个逻辑门的功率分析电阻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hardware implementations of hash function Luffa Multiplexing methods for power watermarking Side-channel attack resistant ROM-based AES S-Box Entropy-based power attack ExCCel: Exploration of complementary cells for efficient DPA attack resistivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1