Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in Retrieval-based Dialogues

Ruijian Xu, Chongyang Tao, Jiazhan Feng, Wei Wu, Rui Yan, Dongyan Zhao
{"title":"Response Ranking with Multi-types of Deep Interactive Representations in Retrieval-based Dialogues","authors":"Ruijian Xu, Chongyang Tao, Jiazhan Feng, Wei Wu, Rui Yan, Dongyan Zhao","doi":"10.1145/3462207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation[K]-interaction[L]-matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.","PeriodicalId":6934,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3462207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Building an intelligent dialogue system with the ability to select a proper response according to a multi-turn context is challenging in three aspects: (1) the meaning of a context–response pair is built upon language units from multiple granularities (e.g., words, phrases, and sub-sentences, etc.); (2) local (e.g., a small window around a word) and long-range (e.g., words across the context and the response) dependencies may exist in dialogue data; and (3) the relationship between the context and the response candidate lies in multiple relevant semantic clues or relatively implicit semantic clues in some real cases. However, existing approaches usually encode the dialogue with mono-type representation and the interaction processes between the context and the response candidate are executed in a rather shallow manner, which may lead to an inadequate understanding of dialogue content and hinder the recognition of the semantic relevance between the context and response. To tackle these challenges, we propose a representation[K]-interaction[L]-matching framework that explores multiple types of deep interactive representations to build context-response matching models for response selection. Particularly, we construct different types of representations for utterance–response pairs and deepen them via alternate encoding and interaction. By this means, the model can handle the relation of neighboring elements, phrasal pattern, and long-range dependencies during the representation and make a more accurate prediction through multiple layers of interactions between the context–response pair. Experiment results on three public benchmarks indicate that the proposed model significantly outperforms previous conventional context-response matching models and achieve slightly better results than the BERT model for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于检索的对话中多类型深度交互表示的响应排序
构建一个能够根据多回合上下文选择适当响应的智能对话系统在三个方面具有挑战性:(1)上下文-响应对的含义建立在多个粒度(例如,单词,短语和子句等)的语言单位上;(2)对话数据中可能存在局部依赖(例如,单词周围的小窗口)和远程依赖(例如,跨上下文和响应的单词);(3)语境与应答候选者之间的关系存在多重相关语义线索或在某些实际情况下存在相对隐式的语义线索。然而,现有的方法通常用单一类型的表示对对话进行编码,并且上下文与应答候选者之间的交互过程执行得相当肤浅,这可能导致对对话内容的理解不足,阻碍了对上下文与应答之间语义相关性的识别。为了解决这些挑战,我们提出了一个表征[K]-交互[L]-匹配框架,该框架探索了多种类型的深度交互表征,以构建用于响应选择的上下文-响应匹配模型。特别是,我们为话语-反应对构建不同类型的表征,并通过交替编码和交互加深它们。通过这种方式,该模型可以在表示过程中处理相邻元素的关系、短语模式和远程依赖关系,并通过上下文-响应对之间的多层交互进行更准确的预测。在三个公共基准上的实验结果表明,该模型明显优于传统的上下文响应匹配模型,并且在基于检索的对话系统的多回合响应选择方面比BERT模型稍好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Graph Learning for Session-based Recommendation GraphHINGE: Learning Interaction Models of Structured Neighborhood on Heterogeneous Information Network Scalable Representation Learning for Dynamic Heterogeneous Information Networks via Metagraphs Complex-valued Neural Network-based Quantum Language Models eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1