Quality differentiation with manufacturer encroachment: is first mover always an advantage for retail platform?

Lixi Zhou, T. Fan, Lihao Zhang, Luyu Chang
{"title":"Quality differentiation with manufacturer encroachment: is first mover always an advantage for retail platform?","authors":"Lixi Zhou, T. Fan, Lihao Zhang, Luyu Chang","doi":"10.1108/imds-07-2022-0403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWith the development of e-commerce and mobile payment, platform sales become unstoppable, and many manufacturers also encroach on online market by establishing direct selling channels. Channel conflict intensifies in online market and quality differentiation and is widely used in business practice as an effective way to alleviate such a competition. The authors study a retail platform's sales strategy and interactions with an upstream manufacturer's encroachment strategy in this paper. Unlike most online marketplace and encroachment research, product quality selection is also engaged in the present research to capture the motivation above.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyze a game-theoretical model that the platform as the first/second mover participates in strategic decision-making, and then jointly decides the product quality level with manufacturer.FindingsThe authors find that encroachment always profits the manufacturer and almost hurts the platform. Interestingly, the first-mover advantage can help the platform guide the manufacturer encroachment and promote a “win–win” situation when product quality level is relatively slight or obvious. Nevertheless, the second-mover advantage can help the platform alleviate the profit loss caused by encroachment when product quality level is moderate. Furthermore, suffered from encroachment loss, the platform can make a credible threat by sales termination to restrain manufacturer encroachment.Originality/valueThis paper innovatively explores the strategic interaction between manufacturer encroachment and quality differentiation in a platform supply chain, and further analyzes the first-mover advantage in this interaction, which fills the gaps of previous platform research and has great significances to enterprise production and operational decision in business practice.","PeriodicalId":13427,"journal":{"name":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","volume":"5 1","pages":"762-793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2022-0403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeWith the development of e-commerce and mobile payment, platform sales become unstoppable, and many manufacturers also encroach on online market by establishing direct selling channels. Channel conflict intensifies in online market and quality differentiation and is widely used in business practice as an effective way to alleviate such a competition. The authors study a retail platform's sales strategy and interactions with an upstream manufacturer's encroachment strategy in this paper. Unlike most online marketplace and encroachment research, product quality selection is also engaged in the present research to capture the motivation above.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyze a game-theoretical model that the platform as the first/second mover participates in strategic decision-making, and then jointly decides the product quality level with manufacturer.FindingsThe authors find that encroachment always profits the manufacturer and almost hurts the platform. Interestingly, the first-mover advantage can help the platform guide the manufacturer encroachment and promote a “win–win” situation when product quality level is relatively slight or obvious. Nevertheless, the second-mover advantage can help the platform alleviate the profit loss caused by encroachment when product quality level is moderate. Furthermore, suffered from encroachment loss, the platform can make a credible threat by sales termination to restrain manufacturer encroachment.Originality/valueThis paper innovatively explores the strategic interaction between manufacturer encroachment and quality differentiation in a platform supply chain, and further analyzes the first-mover advantage in this interaction, which fills the gaps of previous platform research and has great significances to enterprise production and operational decision in business practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制造商侵占下的质量差异化:零售平台先发者总是优势吗?
随着电子商务和移动支付的发展,平台销售势不可挡,许多厂商也通过建立直销渠道蚕食网络市场。渠道冲突在网络市场和质量差异化中愈演愈烈,作为缓解渠道冲突竞争的有效手段,渠道冲突在商业实践中得到了广泛应用。本文研究了零售平台的销售策略及其与上游制造商的入侵策略的相互作用。与大多数在线市场和侵占性研究不同,产品质量选择也参与了本研究,以捕捉上述动机。设计/方法/途径分析了平台作为先发/后发参与战略决策,与制造商共同决定产品质量水平的博弈论模型。研究发现,“侵占”总是对制造商有利,而几乎对平台不利。有趣的是,在产品质量水平相对轻微或明显的情况下,先发优势可以帮助平台引导厂商的蚕食,促进“双赢”的局面。然而,在产品质量水平适中的情况下,后发优势可以帮助平台缓解被侵占带来的利润损失。此外,由于遭受了侵占损失,平台可以通过终止销售来进行可信威胁,以抑制制造商的侵占。原创性/价值本文创新性地探讨了平台供应链中制造商侵占与质量差异化的战略互动关系,并进一步分析了这种互动关系中的先发优势,填补了以往平台研究的空白,对商业实践中的企业生产经营决策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics capability in building supply chain resilience: the moderating effect of innovation-focused complementary assets Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment How doctor image features engage health science short video viewers? Investigating the age and gender bias The impact of enterprise social media usage on employee creativity: a self-regulation perspective Implementation of information and communication technologies in fruit and vegetable supply chain: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1