Static and dynamic overprovisioning strategies for performance consistency in grids

N. Yigitbasi, D. Epema
{"title":"Static and dynamic overprovisioning strategies for performance consistency in grids","authors":"N. Yigitbasi, D. Epema","doi":"10.1109/GRID.2010.5697960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is not uncommon that grid users observe highly variable performance when they submit similar workloads at different times. From the users' point of view, such inconsistent performance is undesirable, and it leads to user dissatisfaction and confusion. We tackle this performance inconsistency problem using overprovisioning which is increasing the system capacity by a factor that we call the overprovisioning factor (к). Although overprovisioning is not cost effective, its simplicity makes it the preferred method for providing performance guarantees. Hence in this work, we present a realistic investigation of overprovisioning in grids. Towards this end, first we present a performance and cost evaluation of static and dynamic overprovisioning strategies. We find that the dynamic overprovisioning strategy, for which we use computing clouds, provides better consistency with lower costs compared to static strategies, and overprovisioning beyond a certain value of к (in our case к=2.5) incurs significant costs without significant consistency improvements. Then, we design and evaluate a feedback-controlled system to dynamically determine к to give performance guarantees to grid users. We show that our system determines к dynamically and provides significant improvements over the initial system, as high as 67%, in the number of jobs that meet the performance requirements.","PeriodicalId":6372,"journal":{"name":"2010 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GRID.2010.5697960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is not uncommon that grid users observe highly variable performance when they submit similar workloads at different times. From the users' point of view, such inconsistent performance is undesirable, and it leads to user dissatisfaction and confusion. We tackle this performance inconsistency problem using overprovisioning which is increasing the system capacity by a factor that we call the overprovisioning factor (к). Although overprovisioning is not cost effective, its simplicity makes it the preferred method for providing performance guarantees. Hence in this work, we present a realistic investigation of overprovisioning in grids. Towards this end, first we present a performance and cost evaluation of static and dynamic overprovisioning strategies. We find that the dynamic overprovisioning strategy, for which we use computing clouds, provides better consistency with lower costs compared to static strategies, and overprovisioning beyond a certain value of к (in our case к=2.5) incurs significant costs without significant consistency improvements. Then, we design and evaluate a feedback-controlled system to dynamically determine к to give performance guarantees to grid users. We show that our system determines к dynamically and provides significant improvements over the initial system, as high as 67%, in the number of jobs that meet the performance requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网格中性能一致性的静态和动态过度供应策略
当网格用户在不同时间提交类似的工作负载时,他们观察到的性能变化很大,这种情况并不少见。从用户的角度来看,这种不一致的性能是不可取的,它会导致用户的不满和困惑。我们使用过度配置来解决这个性能不一致的问题,过度配置通过一个我们称之为过度配置因素的因素来增加系统容量。尽管过度配置并不符合成本效益,但它的简单性使其成为提供性能保证的首选方法。因此,在这项工作中,我们对电网中的过度供应进行了现实的研究。为此,我们首先给出静态和动态过度供应策略的性能和成本评估。我们发现,与静态策略相比,我们使用计算云的动态过度供应策略以更低的成本提供了更好的一致性,并且超过一定值的过度供应(在我们的示例中,是指在没有显著一致性改进的情况下)会导致显著的成本。然后,我们设计并评估了一个反馈控制系统,以动态确定为电网用户提供性能保证的参数。我们表明,我们的系统动态地决定,并在满足性能要求的作业数量方面提供了比初始系统显著的改进,高达67%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On allocation policies for power and performance Adaptively detecting changes in Autonomic Grid Computing Cost-driven scheduling of grid workflows using Partial Critical Paths On the impact of monitoring router energy consumption for greening the Internet SLA compliance monitoring through semantic processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1