Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of various concentrations of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell oil, orange peel, and mango leaf with that of xylitol on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans: An in vitro study

Joby Peter, R. Kumar, S. Vijai, Melvin Augustin, M. Anaswara, A. Ajaykumar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of various concentrations of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell oil, orange peel, and mango leaf with that of xylitol on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans: An in vitro study","authors":"Joby Peter, R. Kumar, S. Vijai, Melvin Augustin, M. Anaswara, A. Ajaykumar","doi":"10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_12_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of plant extracts, as well as other alternative forms of medical treatments, is enjoying great popularity since late 1990s. Scientists from all over the have found literally thousands of phytochemicals which have inhibitory effects on all types of microorganisms in vitro. Moreover, there are the reports of potential hazards and microbial resistance against the commonly used antibiotics. Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of various concentrations of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell oil, orange peel, and mango leaf with that of xylitol on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Materials and Methods: Microbial strains were procured and revived on nutrient agar media. Coconut shell oil extract was prepared by heating ground shell in an earth pot for 3 h. Mango leaf extract was collected by powdering them using a blender and water extracts were prepared using agitation method. Orange peel extract was collected from the fresh peels of oranges which was pureed in a blender. The puree was subjected to hydrodistillation. The oil was separated. 10 g of Xylitol was dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water for base extract. 25%, 50%, 100%, and 200% dilutions of the extracts and xylitol were prepared. The susceptibility of the oral pathogens was determined by the well diffusion method. The extracts were pipetted into the wells and then incubated at 37°C overnight. After overnight incubation, the diameter of the clear zone produced was measured in cm. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the extracts was evaluated by the microdilution method. Serial dilutions of the extracts and xylitol were added to the wells prepared in the agar plate along with nutrient broth and culture. The plates were placed in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h. The absence of turbidity in the wells was recorded as MIC. Results: Highest zone of inhibition was recorded for coconut shell extract against both the test organisms followed by Xylitol. Mango leaf extract and orange peel extract could not demonstrate statistically significant results. The inhibitory effect increased with increasing concentration. MIC of coconut shell extract against C. albicans and S. mutans was found out to be 37.5 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that antibacterial and antifungal effect of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell extract is more when compared to mango leaf, orange peel, and xylitol. Mango leaf and orange peel extracts showed minimum activity.","PeriodicalId":14257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"37 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_12_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of plant extracts, as well as other alternative forms of medical treatments, is enjoying great popularity since late 1990s. Scientists from all over the have found literally thousands of phytochemicals which have inhibitory effects on all types of microorganisms in vitro. Moreover, there are the reports of potential hazards and microbial resistance against the commonly used antibiotics. Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of various concentrations of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell oil, orange peel, and mango leaf with that of xylitol on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Materials and Methods: Microbial strains were procured and revived on nutrient agar media. Coconut shell oil extract was prepared by heating ground shell in an earth pot for 3 h. Mango leaf extract was collected by powdering them using a blender and water extracts were prepared using agitation method. Orange peel extract was collected from the fresh peels of oranges which was pureed in a blender. The puree was subjected to hydrodistillation. The oil was separated. 10 g of Xylitol was dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water for base extract. 25%, 50%, 100%, and 200% dilutions of the extracts and xylitol were prepared. The susceptibility of the oral pathogens was determined by the well diffusion method. The extracts were pipetted into the wells and then incubated at 37°C overnight. After overnight incubation, the diameter of the clear zone produced was measured in cm. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the extracts was evaluated by the microdilution method. Serial dilutions of the extracts and xylitol were added to the wells prepared in the agar plate along with nutrient broth and culture. The plates were placed in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h. The absence of turbidity in the wells was recorded as MIC. Results: Highest zone of inhibition was recorded for coconut shell extract against both the test organisms followed by Xylitol. Mango leaf extract and orange peel extract could not demonstrate statistically significant results. The inhibitory effect increased with increasing concentration. MIC of coconut shell extract against C. albicans and S. mutans was found out to be 37.5 mg and 25 mg, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that antibacterial and antifungal effect of nonalcoholic extracts of crude coconut shell extract is more when compared to mango leaf, orange peel, and xylitol. Mango leaf and orange peel extracts showed minimum activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同浓度的粗椰子壳油、橘子皮和芒果叶的非酒精提取物与木糖醇对变形链球菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌活性的比较评价:一项体外研究
背景:自20世纪90年代末以来,植物提取物的使用以及其他替代形式的医学治疗非常受欢迎。来自世界各地的科学家已经发现了数千种植物化学物质,它们在体外对所有类型的微生物都有抑制作用。此外,也有关于常用抗生素的潜在危害和微生物耐药性的报道。目的:研究不同浓度的粗椰壳油、橘子皮、芒果叶非醇提取物与木糖醇提取物对变形链球菌和白色念珠菌的抑菌作用。材料与方法:获得微生物菌株并在营养琼脂培养基上复活。在土锅中加热磨碎的壳3 h制备椰子壳油提取物,用搅拌器粉碎芒果叶提取物,用搅拌法制备水提取物。橙皮提取物是从新鲜的橙子皮中提取的,并在搅拌机中搅成泥。浆糊进行了加氢蒸馏。油被分离了。将木糖醇10 g溶于10 ml蒸馏水中作为基础提取物。分别制备25%、50%、100%和200%稀释度的提取物和木糖醇。采用孔扩散法测定口腔病原菌的药敏。提取液移入孔中,37℃孵育过夜。孵育过夜后,产生的透明带直径以厘米为单位测量。采用微量稀释法测定其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在琼脂板上制备的孔中加入连续稀释的提取物和木糖醇,同时加入营养液和培养物。将板置于37℃培养箱中24 h。孔中无浊度记录为MIC。结果:椰子壳提取物对两种病原菌的抑制区均最高,木糖醇次之。芒果叶提取物和橘皮提取物均无统计学意义。抑制作用随浓度的增加而增强。椰子壳提取物对白色念珠菌和变形链球菌的MIC分别为37.5 mg和25 mg。结论:根据研究结果,可以得出结论,粗椰壳提取物的非酒精提取物的抗菌和抗真菌作用比芒果叶、橘子皮和木糖醇更强。芒果叶和橘皮提取物的活性最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and differential leukocyte count: Anemia in gingivitis and periodontitis patients in Kerala population – A cross-sectional study Congenital granular cell tumors Early prosthetic management of mandible using interim guidance appliances in hemimandibulectomy patients: A case series Comparative evaluation of conventional and diode laser-assisted gingival curettage in shallow suprabony periodontal pocket – Three months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment and psychology of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1