Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin care pathway for use in primary care

J. Turvill, S. O'Connell, A. Brooks, Karen Bradley-Wood, James Laing, Swaminathan Thiagarajan, David Hammond, D. Turnock, A. Jones, R. Sood, A. Ford
{"title":"Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin care pathway for use in primary care","authors":"J. Turvill, S. O'Connell, A. Brooks, Karen Bradley-Wood, James Laing, Swaminathan Thiagarajan, David Hammond, D. Turnock, A. Jones, R. Sood, A. Ford","doi":"10.1017/S1463423616000049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have recommended faecal calprotectin (FC) testing as an option in adults with lower gastrointestinal symptoms for whom specialist investigations are being considered, if cancer is not suspected and it is used to support a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome. York Hospital and Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group have developed an evidence-based care pathway to support this recommendation for use in primary care. It incorporates a higher FC cut-off value, a ‘traffic light’ system for risk and a clinical management pathway. Objectives To evaluate this care pathway. Methods The care pathway was introduced into five primary care practices for a period of six months and the clinical outcomes of patients were evaluated. Negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) were calculated. GP feedback of the care pathway was obtained by means of a web-based survey. Comparator gastroenterology activity in a neighbouring trust was obtained. Results The care pathway for FC in primary care had a 97% NPV and a 40% PPV. This was better than GP clinical judgement alone and doubled the PPV compared with the standard FC cut-off (<50 mcg/g), without affecting the NPV. In total, 89% of patients with IBD had an FC>250 mcg/g and were diagnosed by ‘straight to test’ colonoscopy within three weeks. The care pathway was considered helpful by GPs and delivered a higher diagnostic yield after secondary care referral (21%) than the conventional comparator pathway (5%). Conclusions A care pathway for the use of FC that incorporates a higher cut-off value, a ‘traffic light’ system for risk and supports clinical decision making can be achieved safely and effectively. It maintains the balance between a high NPV and an acceptable PPV. A modified care pathway for the use of FC in primary care is proposed.","PeriodicalId":20471,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research &amp; Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research &amp; Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Background National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have recommended faecal calprotectin (FC) testing as an option in adults with lower gastrointestinal symptoms for whom specialist investigations are being considered, if cancer is not suspected and it is used to support a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome. York Hospital and Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group have developed an evidence-based care pathway to support this recommendation for use in primary care. It incorporates a higher FC cut-off value, a ‘traffic light’ system for risk and a clinical management pathway. Objectives To evaluate this care pathway. Methods The care pathway was introduced into five primary care practices for a period of six months and the clinical outcomes of patients were evaluated. Negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) were calculated. GP feedback of the care pathway was obtained by means of a web-based survey. Comparator gastroenterology activity in a neighbouring trust was obtained. Results The care pathway for FC in primary care had a 97% NPV and a 40% PPV. This was better than GP clinical judgement alone and doubled the PPV compared with the standard FC cut-off (<50 mcg/g), without affecting the NPV. In total, 89% of patients with IBD had an FC>250 mcg/g and were diagnosed by ‘straight to test’ colonoscopy within three weeks. The care pathway was considered helpful by GPs and delivered a higher diagnostic yield after secondary care referral (21%) than the conventional comparator pathway (5%). Conclusions A care pathway for the use of FC that incorporates a higher cut-off value, a ‘traffic light’ system for risk and supports clinical decision making can be achieved safely and effectively. It maintains the balance between a high NPV and an acceptable PPV. A modified care pathway for the use of FC in primary care is proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价在初级保健中使用的粪钙保护蛋白护理途径
背景:国家健康和护理卓越研究所推荐,如果不怀疑癌症,粪便钙保护蛋白(FC)检测可用于支持炎症性肠病(IBD)或肠易激综合征的诊断,则将粪便钙保护蛋白(FC)检测作为正在考虑进行专家调查的低胃肠道症状成人的一种选择。约克医院和约克河谷临床调试小组已经开发了一个循证护理途径,以支持在初级保健中使用这一建议。它结合了更高的FC临界值、风险“红绿灯”系统和临床管理途径。目的评价这种护理途径。方法将护理路径引入5个初级保健诊所,对患者进行为期6个月的临床疗效评估。计算阴性预测值和阳性预测值(NPV和PPV)。全科医生对护理途径的反馈是通过网络调查获得的。比较者胃肠病学活动在邻近的信托获得。结果初级保健中FC的护理途径NPV为97%,PPV为40%。这比单独的GP临床判断更好,与标准FC截止值(250微克/克)相比,PPV增加了一倍,并在三周内通过“直接检测”结肠镜检查诊断。全科医生认为护理途径是有帮助的,并且在二级护理转诊后提供了更高的诊断率(21%),而传统的比较途径(5%)。结论采用高截断值、风险“红绿灯”系统和支持临床决策的FC护理路径可以安全有效地实现。它在高净现值和可接受的PPV之间保持平衡。提出了在初级保健中使用FC的改进护理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health risk appraisal in older people 7: long-acting benzodiazepine use in community-dwelling older adults in London: is it related to physical or psychological factors? Collaborative Care model in mental health. Scope and experiences after three years of activity in Mexico City Health team for the elderly: a feasibility study for preventive home visits Primary care and the public’s health: evidence from service development initiatives Perception of measures for dealing with Ebola disease in primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1