Comparison of Usage Patterns and Outcomes by Dual Type Calcium Channel Blockers in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

M. Oh, H. Ahn, Sunmi Choi, H. La
{"title":"Comparison of Usage Patterns and Outcomes by Dual Type Calcium Channel Blockers in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease","authors":"M. Oh, H. Ahn, Sunmi Choi, H. La","doi":"10.24304/kjcp.2020.30.4.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dual-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as efonidipine and cilnidipine, are renoprotective drugs that reportedly reduce proteinuria by dilating afferent and efferent arterioles of the glomerulus. However, studies comparing the effect of dual-type CCB on proteinuria have not been conducted. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effect of dual-type CCB (efonidipine and cilnidipine) usage patterns in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 53 patients with CKD who 1) initiated efonidipine or cilnidipine treatment while on a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and 2) had received efonidipine or cilnidipine for at least one year. We compared usage patterns between the efonidipine and cilnidipine groups during the one-year period and analyzed the following outcomes: urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio, blood pressure, and serum creatinine. Results: The study included 25 patients in the efonidipine group and 28 patients in the cilnidipine group. In both groups, blood pressure and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratios tended to decrease; however, the change during each interval was not significant. Conclusions: In patients with CKD who were on renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy, the addition of a dual-type CCB (i.e., efonidipine or cilnidipine) tended to reduce proteinuria; however, the change during each interval was not significant.","PeriodicalId":17901,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24304/kjcp.2020.30.4.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Dual-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs), such as efonidipine and cilnidipine, are renoprotective drugs that reportedly reduce proteinuria by dilating afferent and efferent arterioles of the glomerulus. However, studies comparing the effect of dual-type CCB on proteinuria have not been conducted. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effect of dual-type CCB (efonidipine and cilnidipine) usage patterns in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 53 patients with CKD who 1) initiated efonidipine or cilnidipine treatment while on a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and 2) had received efonidipine or cilnidipine for at least one year. We compared usage patterns between the efonidipine and cilnidipine groups during the one-year period and analyzed the following outcomes: urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio, blood pressure, and serum creatinine. Results: The study included 25 patients in the efonidipine group and 28 patients in the cilnidipine group. In both groups, blood pressure and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratios tended to decrease; however, the change during each interval was not significant. Conclusions: In patients with CKD who were on renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy, the addition of a dual-type CCB (i.e., efonidipine or cilnidipine) tended to reduce proteinuria; however, the change during each interval was not significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双型钙通道阻滞剂在慢性肾病患者中的使用模式和疗效比较
背景:双型钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs),如依福尼平和西尼地平,是肾保护药物,据报道通过扩张肾小球的传入和传出小动脉来减少蛋白尿。然而,比较双型CCB对蛋白尿影响的研究尚未开展。因此,我们旨在比较双型CCB (efonidipine和cilnidipine)在高血压合并慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者中的使用效果。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了53例CKD患者,1)在肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂治疗期间开始使用埃福尼地平或西尼地平治疗,2)接受埃福尼地平或西尼地平治疗至少一年。我们比较了一年内依福尼地平组和西尼地平组的使用模式,并分析了以下结果:尿蛋白与肌酐比、血压和血清肌酐。结果:本研究纳入依福地平组25例,西尼地平组28例。在两组中,血压和尿蛋白/肌酐比值趋于降低;然而,每个间隔的变化并不显著。结论:在接受肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂治疗的CKD患者中,添加双型CCB(即埃福尼地平或西尼地平)倾向于减少蛋白尿;然而,每个间隔的变化并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Public Preferences on Repeat Dispensing Review of Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide in the Management of Obesity Evaluation of Pharmacists’ Intervention Activities in Community Pharmacy Analysis of Factors Associated with Daytime Sleepiness in Korean Adolescents The Impact of Drug Interactions with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Adverse Event Development based on the changes of drug concentration level: Meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1