Robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy: Learning curve

Caillot Jeanne, Abo-Alhassan Fawaz, Lequeu Jean-Baptiste, Doussot Béranger, Rat Patrick, Facy Olivier
{"title":"Robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy: Learning curve","authors":"Caillot Jeanne,&nbsp;Abo-Alhassan Fawaz,&nbsp;Lequeu Jean-Baptiste,&nbsp;Doussot Béranger,&nbsp;Rat Patrick,&nbsp;Facy Olivier","doi":"10.1016/j.soda.2022.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Use of minimally invasive surgery for distal pancreatectomy has been demonstrated with improvement in the length of hospitalisation, blood loss and splenic preservation rate. Current literature concerning operating time with robotic assistance is divergent. The aim of our study is to analyse the learning curve and the evolution of operating time in robotic assisted distal pancreatectomies.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>From 2014 to 2021, in a single center performing 60 to 80 pancreatectomies per year, all patients who underwent robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy were included. A descriptive analysis of peri-operative data has been made as well as an analysis of the learning curve concerning operating time, intraoperative blood loss, splenic preservation rate, length of hospitalization, rate of pancreatic fistula, and grade III and IV Clavien-Dindo's complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>35 patients were included. The number of spleno-pancreatectomies and distal pancreatectomies with splenic preservation were, respectively 28 and 7. Mean operating time was 178 min. Rate of Grade III and IV Clavien Dindo's complications was 5.7%. There was no death within the 90 post operating days. During the inclusion period, the same surgeon performed 318 other robotic assisted digestive surgeries. The operating time was the criteria that improved the most. It decreased from a mean of 236 min for the first 8 procedures, to 165 min from the 9th intervention onwards. 5 out of 7 of splenic preservations were performed from the 26th procedure. Rate of blood loss, length of stay and post-operative complications did not improve during the study period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis suggests a notable decrease in operating time from the 9<sup>th</sup> robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy and leans on the importance of global robotic expertise of the surgeon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101190,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008922000271/pdfft?md5=2df179260cef92af6ac56e778dfeb961&pid=1-s2.0-S2667008922000271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Open Digestive Advance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667008922000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Use of minimally invasive surgery for distal pancreatectomy has been demonstrated with improvement in the length of hospitalisation, blood loss and splenic preservation rate. Current literature concerning operating time with robotic assistance is divergent. The aim of our study is to analyse the learning curve and the evolution of operating time in robotic assisted distal pancreatectomies.

Patients and methods

From 2014 to 2021, in a single center performing 60 to 80 pancreatectomies per year, all patients who underwent robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy were included. A descriptive analysis of peri-operative data has been made as well as an analysis of the learning curve concerning operating time, intraoperative blood loss, splenic preservation rate, length of hospitalization, rate of pancreatic fistula, and grade III and IV Clavien-Dindo's complications.

Results

35 patients were included. The number of spleno-pancreatectomies and distal pancreatectomies with splenic preservation were, respectively 28 and 7. Mean operating time was 178 min. Rate of Grade III and IV Clavien Dindo's complications was 5.7%. There was no death within the 90 post operating days. During the inclusion period, the same surgeon performed 318 other robotic assisted digestive surgeries. The operating time was the criteria that improved the most. It decreased from a mean of 236 min for the first 8 procedures, to 165 min from the 9th intervention onwards. 5 out of 7 of splenic preservations were performed from the 26th procedure. Rate of blood loss, length of stay and post-operative complications did not improve during the study period.

Conclusion

Our analysis suggests a notable decrease in operating time from the 9th robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy and leans on the importance of global robotic expertise of the surgeon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术:学习曲线
微创手术用于远端胰腺切除术已被证明可以改善住院时间、出血量和脾保存率。目前关于机器人辅助操作时间的文献存在分歧。本研究的目的是分析机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的学习曲线和手术时间的演变。患者和方法从2014年到2021年,在一个每年进行60 - 80例胰腺切除术的单一中心,所有接受机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的患者都被纳入。对围手术期资料进行描述性分析,并对手术时间、术中出血量、脾保存率、住院时间、胰瘘发生率、III级和IV级Clavien-Dindo并发症的学习曲线进行分析。结果纳入35例患者。脾胰切除术28例,远端胰切除术保脾7例。平均手术时间178 min。III级和IV级Clavien Dindo并发症发生率为5.7%。术后90天内无死亡病例。在纳入期间,同一位外科医生进行了318次其他机器人辅助消化手术。手术时间是改善最大的标准。从前8次手术的平均236分钟下降到第9次手术后的165分钟。7例脾保存中有5例在第26次手术后完成。出血率、住院时间和术后并发症在研究期间没有改善。结论我们的分析表明,从第9次机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术开始,手术时间明显减少,这表明外科医生的全球机器人专业知识的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Surgical management of jejuno-jejunal intussuception 7 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (with video) Robotic management of a complicated sleeve gastroplasty in a patient with a pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumor (with video) Laparoscopic repair of strangulated diaphragmatic hernia (with video)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1