Use of Outcome Measures by Certified Lymphedema Therapists With Survivors of Breast Cancer With Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Rehabilitation Oncology Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000310
D. Doubblestein, Bryan A. Spinelli, A. Goldberg, C. A. Larson, A. Yorke
{"title":"Use of Outcome Measures by Certified Lymphedema Therapists With Survivors of Breast Cancer With Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema","authors":"D. Doubblestein, Bryan A. Spinelli, A. Goldberg, C. A. Larson, A. Yorke","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Survivors of breast cancer (SBC) with breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) have demonstrated neuromusculoskeletal restrictions, sensorimotor impairments, postural instability, and balance deficits. To date, there have been no studies that investigate outcome measures (OMs) used by certified lymphedema therapists (CLTs) with SBC with BCRL. Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) determine types of OMs used and their frequency of use by CLTs with SBC with BCRL and their differences between therapy professions, and (2) identify unique characteristic predictors for use of OMs. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey research design. Electronic surveys were distributed to CLTs from various institutions. Data from 70 physical therapists (PTs) and 41 occupational therapists were analyzed from 130 completed surveys. Results: Sixteen OMs used most often assessed joint function, flexibility, strength, pain, volume, sensation, tissue consistency, body composition, health-related quality of life, and upper quadrant function. There were differences between PTs and occupational therapists in use of OMs. Lymphology Association of North America certification, practice setting, and profession (physical therapy and occupational therapy) predicted the use of some OMs. Conclusions: This study identified individual OMs used on SBC with BCRL in clinical practice among interdisciplinary CLTs. The number of OMs used to assess body functions and structures exceed those OMs for activities and participation, which may be influenced by CLT profession, Lymphology Association of North America certification, and level of highest degree.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"34 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Survivors of breast cancer (SBC) with breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) have demonstrated neuromusculoskeletal restrictions, sensorimotor impairments, postural instability, and balance deficits. To date, there have been no studies that investigate outcome measures (OMs) used by certified lymphedema therapists (CLTs) with SBC with BCRL. Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) determine types of OMs used and their frequency of use by CLTs with SBC with BCRL and their differences between therapy professions, and (2) identify unique characteristic predictors for use of OMs. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey research design. Electronic surveys were distributed to CLTs from various institutions. Data from 70 physical therapists (PTs) and 41 occupational therapists were analyzed from 130 completed surveys. Results: Sixteen OMs used most often assessed joint function, flexibility, strength, pain, volume, sensation, tissue consistency, body composition, health-related quality of life, and upper quadrant function. There were differences between PTs and occupational therapists in use of OMs. Lymphology Association of North America certification, practice setting, and profession (physical therapy and occupational therapy) predicted the use of some OMs. Conclusions: This study identified individual OMs used on SBC with BCRL in clinical practice among interdisciplinary CLTs. The number of OMs used to assess body functions and structures exceed those OMs for activities and participation, which may be influenced by CLT profession, Lymphology Association of North America certification, and level of highest degree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经认证的淋巴水肿治疗师对患有乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者使用结果测量
背景:乳腺癌(SBC)伴乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的幸存者表现出神经肌肉骨骼限制、感觉运动障碍、姿势不稳定和平衡缺陷。迄今为止,还没有研究调查经过认证的淋巴水肿治疗师(clt)使用SBC和BCRL的结果测量(OMs)。目的:本研究的目的是(1)确定SBC合并BCRL的clt使用的OMs类型和使用频率,以及它们在治疗专业之间的差异,(2)确定OMs使用的独特特征预测因子。方法:采用横断面在线调查研究设计。电子调查问卷已分发给各机构的对照表。来自70名物理治疗师(PTs)和41名职业治疗师的数据分析来自130份完成的调查。结果:16个OMs最常用于评估关节功能、柔韧性、力量、疼痛、体积、感觉、组织一致性、身体组成、健康相关生活质量和上腹功能。PTs与职业治疗师在使用OMs方面存在差异。北美淋巴协会认证、实践设置和专业(物理治疗和职业治疗)预测了一些OMs的使用。结论:本研究确定了跨学科clt临床实践中使用BCRL治疗SBC的个体OMs。用于评估身体功能和结构的OMs数量超过用于活动和参与的OMs数量,这可能受到CLT专业、北美淋巴协会认证和最高学位水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Assessment of rehabilitation practices during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States: a survey. Indocyanine Green Lymphography in Conservative Lymphedema Therapy: A Scoping Review A Review of Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer: Implications for Rehabilitation The Psychological and Biological Benefits of Mind-Body Therapy Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer: A Systematic Review The Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Lung Cancer After Surgery: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1