Current Status and Improvement of Reimbursement Policy for Insulin Delivery Device in Korea: Toward Universal Use of Artificial Pancreas

E. Z. Yoon, Jae Hyeon Kim, Nakyung Jeon
{"title":"Current Status and Improvement of Reimbursement Policy for Insulin Delivery Device in Korea: Toward Universal Use of Artificial Pancreas","authors":"E. Z. Yoon, Jae Hyeon Kim, Nakyung Jeon","doi":"10.17480/psk.2022.66.4.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive insulin therapy is the primary treatment option for patients with type 1 and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Insulin pump therapy and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) are the principal methods of intensive insulin therapy. The clinical utility of an insulin pump is generally greater than an MDI regimen. An artificial pancreas, which is an insulin pump with an integrated continuous glucose monitor (CGM), has recently been introduced on the market with emerging clinical evidence. Although it may offer clinical benefits and reduce the self-management burden among patients with diabetes, its potential for inappropriate use and unaffordability are the major barriers to its universal utilization. Despite the medical assistance program offered by the Korean National Healthcare System, which provides coverage for consumables and devices for diabetes treatment, some patients cannot afford to use an advanced insulin delivery system (i.e., the artificial pancreas). Under the current reimbursement policy, the healthcare system considers an insulin pump and a CGM as separate items for regulatory and reimbursement purposes. In other words, the artificial pancreas is categorized as an insulin pump and reimbursed at the same amount as a traditional insulin pump. The fundamental operating function may be the same between the artificial pancreas and a traditional insulin pump; however, there should be a different reimbursement pathway to make a novel category for the artificial pancreas instead of categorizing it under insulin pumps and to differentiate pricing based on the comparative (cost-) effectiveness among insulin delivery devices. Other countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France are moving toward rapid and universal adoption of the artificial pancreas supported by their clinical governance and regulatory affairs. In this review, we highlight the need to improve the accessibility and affordability of advanced diabetes technology by discussing the current issues in the reimbursement policy that limit the universal use of advanced insulin delivery devices in Korea.","PeriodicalId":23923,"journal":{"name":"Yakhak Hoeji","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakhak Hoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17480/psk.2022.66.4.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive insulin therapy is the primary treatment option for patients with type 1 and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Insulin pump therapy and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) are the principal methods of intensive insulin therapy. The clinical utility of an insulin pump is generally greater than an MDI regimen. An artificial pancreas, which is an insulin pump with an integrated continuous glucose monitor (CGM), has recently been introduced on the market with emerging clinical evidence. Although it may offer clinical benefits and reduce the self-management burden among patients with diabetes, its potential for inappropriate use and unaffordability are the major barriers to its universal utilization. Despite the medical assistance program offered by the Korean National Healthcare System, which provides coverage for consumables and devices for diabetes treatment, some patients cannot afford to use an advanced insulin delivery system (i.e., the artificial pancreas). Under the current reimbursement policy, the healthcare system considers an insulin pump and a CGM as separate items for regulatory and reimbursement purposes. In other words, the artificial pancreas is categorized as an insulin pump and reimbursed at the same amount as a traditional insulin pump. The fundamental operating function may be the same between the artificial pancreas and a traditional insulin pump; however, there should be a different reimbursement pathway to make a novel category for the artificial pancreas instead of categorizing it under insulin pumps and to differentiate pricing based on the comparative (cost-) effectiveness among insulin delivery devices. Other countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France are moving toward rapid and universal adoption of the artificial pancreas supported by their clinical governance and regulatory affairs. In this review, we highlight the need to improve the accessibility and affordability of advanced diabetes technology by discussing the current issues in the reimbursement policy that limit the universal use of advanced insulin delivery devices in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国胰岛素输送装置报销政策的现状与改进:面向人工胰腺的普遍应用
强化胰岛素治疗是1型和未控制的2型糖尿病患者的主要治疗选择。胰岛素泵治疗和每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI)是强化胰岛素治疗的主要方法。胰岛素泵的临床效用通常大于MDI方案。人工胰腺是一种具有集成连续血糖监测仪(CGM)的胰岛素泵,最近已被引入市场,并有新的临床证据。尽管它可以提供临床益处并减轻糖尿病患者的自我管理负担,但其潜在的不当使用和负担不起是其普遍使用的主要障碍。虽然国民保健系统提供医疗支援,为糖尿病治疗的耗材和设备提供保险,但一些患者无法使用先进的胰岛素输送系统(即人工胰腺)。在目前的报销政策下,医疗保健系统将胰岛素泵和CGM视为单独的项目,以进行监管和报销。换句话说,人工胰腺被归类为胰岛素泵,并以与传统胰岛素泵相同的金额报销。人工胰腺和传统胰岛素泵的基本操作功能可能是相同的;然而,应该有一个不同的报销途径,为人工胰腺制定一个新的类别,而不是将其归类于胰岛素泵,并根据不同胰岛素输送装置的比较(成本)效果来区分定价。其他国家,如美国、英国、德国和法国,在其临床治理和监管事务的支持下,正朝着快速和普遍采用人工胰腺的方向发展。在这篇综述中,我们通过讨论限制韩国先进胰岛素输送设备普遍使用的报销政策中的当前问题,强调需要提高先进糖尿病技术的可及性和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Osteoporosis-related Healthcare Costs with the Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a Population-based National Cohort Study in Korea Comparative Review of Added Health Benefits of the Drugs Listed through Economic Evaluation Exemption Procedure in Korea: Cases of France, Germany, and Canada Korean Elderly’s Demand for Supplying Elderly-friendly Dosage Forms Easy to Swallow The Societal/economical Impact of Trastuzumab-deruxtecan in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Recent Issues and Regulatory Requirements of Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1