Lack of Benefit With Combination Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection

J. Njoku, T. V. Van Schooneveld, M. Rupp, K. Olsen, F. Qiu, J. Meza, E. Hermsen
{"title":"Lack of Benefit With Combination Therapy for Clostridium difficile Infection","authors":"J. Njoku, T. V. Van Schooneveld, M. Rupp, K. Olsen, F. Qiu, J. Meza, E. Hermsen","doi":"10.1017/ice.2016.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited data exist regarding combination therapy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). After adjusting for confounders in a cohort of patients with CDI and≥1 year old, combination therapy was not associated with significant differences in clinical outcomes, but it was associated with prolonged duration of therapy (1.22 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.44 days; P=.02). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:602–605","PeriodicalId":13655,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"602 - 605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Limited data exist regarding combination therapy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). After adjusting for confounders in a cohort of patients with CDI and≥1 year old, combination therapy was not associated with significant differences in clinical outcomes, but it was associated with prolonged duration of therapy (1.22 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.44 days; P=.02). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:602–605
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难辨梭菌感染联合治疗缺乏益处
关于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的联合治疗的数据有限。在CDI患者和≥1岁患者队列中调整混杂因素后,联合治疗与临床结果无显著差异,但与延长治疗时间(1.22天;95%置信区间1.03-1.44天;P = .02点)。中华流行病学杂志,2017;38 (5):591 - 591
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICE volume 39 issue 7 Cover and Front matter ICE volume 39 issue 7 Cover and Back matter ICE volume 39 issue 6 Cover and Front matter ICE volume 39 issue 6 Cover and Back matter ICE volume 39 issue 5 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1