Development Incentive Program at Carbon Trading Activity in KPHP Tasik Besar Serkap

Q4 Multidisciplinary Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Pub Date : 2017-02-14 DOI:10.31227/osf.io/eh8pn
Emy Sadjati, M. Ikhwan, A. T. Ratnaningsih
{"title":"Development Incentive Program at Carbon Trading Activity in KPHP Tasik Besar Serkap","authors":"Emy Sadjati, M. Ikhwan, A. T. Ratnaningsih","doi":"10.31227/osf.io/eh8pn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"REDD+ mechanism has been considered as an effective way to mitigate climate change in developing countries since it targets to remove carbon emissions and compensate the local communities for their conservation efforts. Incentive programs of REDD+ projects should be tailored carefully because they can cause both positive and negative effects to local communities. This research was conducted to suggest incentive program options for a peat land REDD+ project in Riau Provincial. Frequently adopted incentive programs were identified from literature review, and few more options were added based on previous local survey. Seven incentive options were finalized for the survey through discussion with KPH Tasik Besar Serkap. To figure out preference on and importance of the incentive options for local communities, questionnaire survey was conducted on 40 respondent in 2 villages around the project area. Local livelihoods activities in forest were also investigated. Collected data was used for frequency analysis and AHP analysis. Although gap between preference and importance of the options was found, the difference was minor. Among the incentive options, the respondents preferred provision of ‘goods for agriculture and fishery’, ‘electricity generator’, ‘establishment of community forest’ and ‘job creation’. Diverse local livelihood activities in forests were confirmed, though intensity of dependence was different among the villages. It is concluded that a set of small incentive programs would lead to better results than ‘one-big’ incentive program, since it can provide more opportunities for local people to participate in. To develop an effective incentive program for REDD+ project, local preference, importance for local community, and impacts on local livelihood should be considered simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":36430,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","volume":"96 1","pages":"103-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/eh8pn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

REDD+ mechanism has been considered as an effective way to mitigate climate change in developing countries since it targets to remove carbon emissions and compensate the local communities for their conservation efforts. Incentive programs of REDD+ projects should be tailored carefully because they can cause both positive and negative effects to local communities. This research was conducted to suggest incentive program options for a peat land REDD+ project in Riau Provincial. Frequently adopted incentive programs were identified from literature review, and few more options were added based on previous local survey. Seven incentive options were finalized for the survey through discussion with KPH Tasik Besar Serkap. To figure out preference on and importance of the incentive options for local communities, questionnaire survey was conducted on 40 respondent in 2 villages around the project area. Local livelihoods activities in forest were also investigated. Collected data was used for frequency analysis and AHP analysis. Although gap between preference and importance of the options was found, the difference was minor. Among the incentive options, the respondents preferred provision of ‘goods for agriculture and fishery’, ‘electricity generator’, ‘establishment of community forest’ and ‘job creation’. Diverse local livelihood activities in forests were confirmed, though intensity of dependence was different among the villages. It is concluded that a set of small incentive programs would lead to better results than ‘one-big’ incentive program, since it can provide more opportunities for local people to participate in. To develop an effective incentive program for REDD+ project, local preference, importance for local community, and impacts on local livelihood should be considered simultaneously.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展激励计划在KPHP的碳交易活动Tasik Besar Serkap
REDD+机制被认为是减缓发展中国家气候变化的有效途径,因为它旨在消除碳排放并补偿当地社区的保护努力。REDD+项目的激励方案应谨慎制定,因为它们可能对当地社区产生积极和消极的影响。本研究旨在为廖内省泥炭地REDD+项目提供激励方案。从文献综述中确定了常用的激励方案,并根据之前的地方调查增加了一些选项。通过与KPH Tasik Besar Serkap讨论,最终确定了调查的七个奖励方案。为了了解当地社区对激励方案的偏好和重要性,我们在项目区周围的2个村庄对40名受访者进行了问卷调查。还对当地森林生计活动进行了调查。收集的数据用于频率分析和AHP分析。虽然选择的偏好和重要性之间存在差距,但差异很小。在奖励方案中,被调查者倾向于提供“农业和渔业产品”、“发电机”、“建立社区森林”和“创造就业机会”。虽然各个村庄对森林的依赖程度不同,但证实了当地森林生计活动的多样性。结论是,一套小的激励方案比“一个大”的激励方案效果更好,因为它可以为当地人提供更多的参与机会。要制定有效的REDD+项目激励方案,需要同时考虑当地偏好、对当地社区的重要性以及对当地生计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How does artificial intelligence affect the business context? A bibliometric analysis The impact of technology absorption capacity on competitive advantage in Vietnamese small and medium enterprises Evaluating the effect of using augmented reality (Metaverse) on improving the teaching and academic performance Morphometric evaluation of guinea pigs (Cavia Porcellus) in Southern Peru The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on financial performance: Evidence from Japanese companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1