{"title":"Development Incentive Program at Carbon Trading Activity in KPHP Tasik Besar Serkap","authors":"Emy Sadjati, M. Ikhwan, A. T. Ratnaningsih","doi":"10.31227/osf.io/eh8pn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"REDD+ mechanism has been considered as an effective way to mitigate climate change in developing countries since it targets to remove carbon emissions and compensate the local communities for their conservation efforts. Incentive programs of REDD+ projects should be tailored carefully because they can cause both positive and negative effects to local communities. This research was conducted to suggest incentive program options for a peat land REDD+ project in Riau Provincial. Frequently adopted incentive programs were identified from literature review, and few more options were added based on previous local survey. Seven incentive options were finalized for the survey through discussion with KPH Tasik Besar Serkap. To figure out preference on and importance of the incentive options for local communities, questionnaire survey was conducted on 40 respondent in 2 villages around the project area. Local livelihoods activities in forest were also investigated. Collected data was used for frequency analysis and AHP analysis. Although gap between preference and importance of the options was found, the difference was minor. Among the incentive options, the respondents preferred provision of ‘goods for agriculture and fishery’, ‘electricity generator’, ‘establishment of community forest’ and ‘job creation’. Diverse local livelihood activities in forests were confirmed, though intensity of dependence was different among the villages. It is concluded that a set of small incentive programs would lead to better results than ‘one-big’ incentive program, since it can provide more opportunities for local people to participate in. To develop an effective incentive program for REDD+ project, local preference, importance for local community, and impacts on local livelihood should be considered simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":36430,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","volume":"96 1","pages":"103-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/eh8pn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
REDD+ mechanism has been considered as an effective way to mitigate climate change in developing countries since it targets to remove carbon emissions and compensate the local communities for their conservation efforts. Incentive programs of REDD+ projects should be tailored carefully because they can cause both positive and negative effects to local communities. This research was conducted to suggest incentive program options for a peat land REDD+ project in Riau Provincial. Frequently adopted incentive programs were identified from literature review, and few more options were added based on previous local survey. Seven incentive options were finalized for the survey through discussion with KPH Tasik Besar Serkap. To figure out preference on and importance of the incentive options for local communities, questionnaire survey was conducted on 40 respondent in 2 villages around the project area. Local livelihoods activities in forest were also investigated. Collected data was used for frequency analysis and AHP analysis. Although gap between preference and importance of the options was found, the difference was minor. Among the incentive options, the respondents preferred provision of ‘goods for agriculture and fishery’, ‘electricity generator’, ‘establishment of community forest’ and ‘job creation’. Diverse local livelihood activities in forests were confirmed, though intensity of dependence was different among the villages. It is concluded that a set of small incentive programs would lead to better results than ‘one-big’ incentive program, since it can provide more opportunities for local people to participate in. To develop an effective incentive program for REDD+ project, local preference, importance for local community, and impacts on local livelihood should be considered simultaneously.
REDD+机制被认为是减缓发展中国家气候变化的有效途径,因为它旨在消除碳排放并补偿当地社区的保护努力。REDD+项目的激励方案应谨慎制定,因为它们可能对当地社区产生积极和消极的影响。本研究旨在为廖内省泥炭地REDD+项目提供激励方案。从文献综述中确定了常用的激励方案,并根据之前的地方调查增加了一些选项。通过与KPH Tasik Besar Serkap讨论,最终确定了调查的七个奖励方案。为了了解当地社区对激励方案的偏好和重要性,我们在项目区周围的2个村庄对40名受访者进行了问卷调查。还对当地森林生计活动进行了调查。收集的数据用于频率分析和AHP分析。虽然选择的偏好和重要性之间存在差距,但差异很小。在奖励方案中,被调查者倾向于提供“农业和渔业产品”、“发电机”、“建立社区森林”和“创造就业机会”。虽然各个村庄对森林的依赖程度不同,但证实了当地森林生计活动的多样性。结论是,一套小的激励方案比“一个大”的激励方案效果更好,因为它可以为当地人提供更多的参与机会。要制定有效的REDD+项目激励方案,需要同时考虑当地偏好、对当地社区的重要性以及对当地生计的影响。