Abstract 3341: Rural and urban disparities in colonoscopy use persisted despite cost-sharing reduction among Medicare beneficiaries

Min Jee Lee, W. Jenkins, E. Boakye, S. Ganai
{"title":"Abstract 3341: Rural and urban disparities in colonoscopy use persisted despite cost-sharing reduction among Medicare beneficiaries","authors":"Min Jee Lee, W. Jenkins, E. Boakye, S. Ganai","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-3341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicare began waiving Part B deductibles and eliminating coinsurance for all colonoscopies in 2011. As rural populations have significantly lower income than urban, there is hope the cost reduction would decrease rural screening disparities. We thus examined rural-urban colonoscopy use pre-/post-ACA implementation. Methods: We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (2008-2016) to examine colonoscopy utilization for two years pre-ACA (2008 and 2010) and three years post-ACA (2012, 2014, and 2016) with stratification by rural/urban residence. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the differences in screening likelihood across rural and urban groups, while controlling for other factors such as age, sex, marital status, race/ethnicity, household income, educational attainment, gastroenterologist availability, exercise, smoking, and years. Results: Of the 302,941 eligible Medicare beneficiaries, 203,426 (67.2%) received a colonoscopy. Colonoscopy receipt increased from 62.8% pre-ACA to 70.2% post-ACA years (p Conclusions: Despite cost-sharing reduction of Medicare coverage for colonoscopy, rural and urban differences in colonoscopy use persisted over time among Medicare beneficiaries. Although the receipt of colonoscopy increased over time, the gap between rural and urban populations has remained. Citation Format: Min Jee Lee, Wiley Jenkins, Eric Adjei Boakye, Sabha Ganai. Rural and urban disparities in colonoscopy use persisted despite cost-sharing reduction among Medicare beneficiaries [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3341.","PeriodicalId":21579,"journal":{"name":"Science and Health Policy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-3341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicare began waiving Part B deductibles and eliminating coinsurance for all colonoscopies in 2011. As rural populations have significantly lower income than urban, there is hope the cost reduction would decrease rural screening disparities. We thus examined rural-urban colonoscopy use pre-/post-ACA implementation. Methods: We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (2008-2016) to examine colonoscopy utilization for two years pre-ACA (2008 and 2010) and three years post-ACA (2012, 2014, and 2016) with stratification by rural/urban residence. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the differences in screening likelihood across rural and urban groups, while controlling for other factors such as age, sex, marital status, race/ethnicity, household income, educational attainment, gastroenterologist availability, exercise, smoking, and years. Results: Of the 302,941 eligible Medicare beneficiaries, 203,426 (67.2%) received a colonoscopy. Colonoscopy receipt increased from 62.8% pre-ACA to 70.2% post-ACA years (p Conclusions: Despite cost-sharing reduction of Medicare coverage for colonoscopy, rural and urban differences in colonoscopy use persisted over time among Medicare beneficiaries. Although the receipt of colonoscopy increased over time, the gap between rural and urban populations has remained. Citation Format: Min Jee Lee, Wiley Jenkins, Eric Adjei Boakye, Sabha Ganai. Rural and urban disparities in colonoscopy use persisted despite cost-sharing reduction among Medicare beneficiaries [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3341.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要3341:尽管医疗保险受益人的费用分摊减少,但城乡结肠镜检查使用的差异仍然存在
背景:由于《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)的通过,医疗保险于2011年开始免除B部分的免赔额,并取消所有结肠镜检查的共同保险。由于农村人口的收入明显低于城市人口,因此降低成本有望减少农村筛查的差距。因此,我们检查了aca实施前后城乡结肠镜检查的使用情况。方法:采用行为风险因素监测系统(Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2008-2016)数据,按城乡居民分层,对aca前2年(2008年和2010年)和aca后3年(2012年、2014年和2016年)的结肠镜使用情况进行调查。使用多变量logistic回归来检查农村和城市人群筛查可能性的差异,同时控制其他因素,如年龄、性别、婚姻状况、种族/民族、家庭收入、教育程度、胃肠病学家的可用性、运动、吸烟和年龄。结果:在302941名符合条件的医疗保险受益人中,203426人(67.2%)接受了结肠镜检查。结肠镜检查使用率从aca前的62.8%增加到aca后的70.2% (p结论:尽管医疗保险对结肠镜检查的费用分摊减少了,但在医疗保险受益人中,农村和城市结肠镜检查使用率的差异持续存在。虽然接受结肠镜检查的人数随着时间的推移而增加,但城乡人口之间的差距仍然存在。引用格式:Min Jee Lee, Wiley Jenkins, Eric Adjei Boakye, Sabha Ganai。尽管医疗保险受益人的费用分摊减少,但城乡结肠镜检查使用的差异仍然存在[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):摘要nr 3341。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract 2634: French health utilities for patients with glioblastoma using TTFields Abstract 2635: Contemporary clinical practice guidelines for the management of glioblastoma: an international survey Abstract 2627: Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia Abstract 2625: 3Din vitroprostate cancer PDX resource for studying cancer health disparities Abstract 2629: Young onset colorectal cancer patients, survivors and caregivers: self-report clinical, psychosocial, financial and quality of life outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1