Teaching a while measuring b: cultural bias in assessing student performance

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International Education in Business Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.1108/JIEB-01-2021-0005
Sandra Seno‐Alday, A. Budde-Sung
{"title":"Teaching a while measuring b: cultural bias in assessing student performance","authors":"Sandra Seno‐Alday, A. Budde-Sung","doi":"10.1108/JIEB-01-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the impact of differences in educational traditions on conventions of teaching and learning, and on the measurement of learning outcomes. These are critical issues within the context of business schools that are steeped in one dominant tradition but have a large population of international students previously educated in other traditions. The paper argues that international students face the challenge of satisfactorily demonstrating learning according to foreign conventions that are different from what they would have been accustomed to within the framework of their home educational tradition.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study draws on a bilingual literature review to capture differences in educational traditions between Australia and China. It then uses logistic regression to analyze the performance of 800 domestic and international Chinese students across a range of different assessment formats at a large Australian business school.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study finds statistically significant differences in the performance of these two student groups on different assessment types. It concludes that the conventions on approaches to the assessment of learning shaped by a specific educational tradition can hamper the effective demonstration of learning among students from other educational traditions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper focuses on issues related to the assessment of learning in multicultural higher education contexts, which has received less attention in the literature compared to issues on teaching approaches in multicultural contexts. The paper also highlights important implications on the validity of the measurement of learning outcomes and on the subsequent impact on graduate recruitment.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-01-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the impact of differences in educational traditions on conventions of teaching and learning, and on the measurement of learning outcomes. These are critical issues within the context of business schools that are steeped in one dominant tradition but have a large population of international students previously educated in other traditions. The paper argues that international students face the challenge of satisfactorily demonstrating learning according to foreign conventions that are different from what they would have been accustomed to within the framework of their home educational tradition. Design/methodology/approach This study draws on a bilingual literature review to capture differences in educational traditions between Australia and China. It then uses logistic regression to analyze the performance of 800 domestic and international Chinese students across a range of different assessment formats at a large Australian business school. Findings The study finds statistically significant differences in the performance of these two student groups on different assessment types. It concludes that the conventions on approaches to the assessment of learning shaped by a specific educational tradition can hamper the effective demonstration of learning among students from other educational traditions. Originality/value The paper focuses on issues related to the assessment of learning in multicultural higher education contexts, which has received less attention in the literature compared to issues on teaching approaches in multicultural contexts. The paper also highlights important implications on the validity of the measurement of learning outcomes and on the subsequent impact on graduate recruitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学的同时衡量b:评估学生表现的文化偏见
目的:本研究旨在探讨教育传统差异对教学习惯和学习成果测量的影响。这些都是商学院背景下的关键问题,因为它们沉浸在一种占主导地位的传统中,但拥有大量以前接受过其他传统教育的国际学生。本文认为,国际学生面临的挑战是,如何令人满意地展示根据外国惯例进行的学习,这些惯例与他们在本国教育传统框架内所习惯的不同。设计/方法/方法本研究利用双语文献综述来捕捉澳大利亚和中国之间教育传统的差异。然后,它使用逻辑回归分析了澳大利亚一所大型商学院800名中国国内外学生在一系列不同评估格式中的表现。研究发现,这两组学生在不同的评估类型上的表现有统计学上的显著差异。它的结论是,由特定教育传统形成的关于评估学习方法的公约可能妨碍来自其他教育传统的学生有效地展示学习。本文关注的是多元文化高等教育背景下的学习评估问题,与多元文化背景下的教学方法问题相比,这一问题在文献中受到的关注较少。本文还强调了学习成果测量的有效性以及对毕业生招聘的后续影响的重要含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing business education: neurodiversity informed faculty development practices Teaching and learning in business schools post-pandemic: a digital future Short-term study abroad (STSA): a review of key risks and challenges Faculty-Led Program: Food and Beverage Supply Chain – from the first mile to the last mile Project management education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a multi-method approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1