From ”learning to read” to ”reading to learn”: An analysis of the reading mistakes made by students

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2298/zipi1902573b
Nevena Budjevac
{"title":"From ”learning to read” to ”reading to learn”: An analysis of the reading mistakes made by students","authors":"Nevena Budjevac","doi":"10.2298/zipi1902573b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading literacy is a complex competence that consists of a series of functionally applicable knowledge, skills, attitudes and strategies that the individual gains and uses through formal and informal education and through everyday life. In addition to the skills, which allow the reader to understand individual words and sentences, the backbone of the development of reading literacy is the development of skills and processes that allow them to construct the meaning of the entirety of the text. Mastering these skills paves the way for children to transition from the learning- to-read phase to the reading-to-learn phase, which should take place towards the end of the first cycle of compulsory education. This is why the aim of this study was to explore in detail the difficulties that pupils face at the end of the 4th grade, regarding reading comprehension. The study included 170 pupils from Belgrade. The study was conducted in groups and lasted for one school period. The study used 50 tasks that previous research had shown reliably tested different levels of reading comprehension at the given age. The tasks were divided into six blocks (6 to 9 tasks per block), and each child did two blocks of tasks (incomplete study design). All the incorrect answers were analysed in detail against the type of requirement that the specific task had, and they were classified according to the type of mistake that the child made. The results showed that at the end of the 4th grade a significant number of students had not developed skills that comprise the backbone for reading comprehension, based on which we concluded that their capacity to use reading as a tool of learning and development was somewhat limited.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":"11 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi1902573b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading literacy is a complex competence that consists of a series of functionally applicable knowledge, skills, attitudes and strategies that the individual gains and uses through formal and informal education and through everyday life. In addition to the skills, which allow the reader to understand individual words and sentences, the backbone of the development of reading literacy is the development of skills and processes that allow them to construct the meaning of the entirety of the text. Mastering these skills paves the way for children to transition from the learning- to-read phase to the reading-to-learn phase, which should take place towards the end of the first cycle of compulsory education. This is why the aim of this study was to explore in detail the difficulties that pupils face at the end of the 4th grade, regarding reading comprehension. The study included 170 pupils from Belgrade. The study was conducted in groups and lasted for one school period. The study used 50 tasks that previous research had shown reliably tested different levels of reading comprehension at the given age. The tasks were divided into six blocks (6 to 9 tasks per block), and each child did two blocks of tasks (incomplete study design). All the incorrect answers were analysed in detail against the type of requirement that the specific task had, and they were classified according to the type of mistake that the child made. The results showed that at the end of the 4th grade a significant number of students had not developed skills that comprise the backbone for reading comprehension, based on which we concluded that their capacity to use reading as a tool of learning and development was somewhat limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“学读”到“读学”:学生阅读错误分析
阅读素养是一种复杂的能力,由个人通过正规和非正规教育以及日常生活获得和使用的一系列实用知识、技能、态度和策略组成。除了使读者能够理解单个单词和句子的技能之外,阅读素养发展的支柱是使他们能够构建整个文本的意义的技能和过程的发展。掌握这些技能为儿童从学习到阅读阶段过渡到阅读到学习阶段铺平了道路,这应该在第一个义务教育周期结束时发生。这就是为什么本研究的目的是详细探讨四年级学生在阅读理解方面面临的困难。这项研究包括来自贝尔格莱德的170名学生。这项研究是分组进行的,持续了一个学期。这项研究使用了50项任务,之前的研究表明,这些任务可靠地测试了给定年龄的不同阅读理解水平。任务被分成6个块(每个块6到9个任务),每个孩子做两个块的任务(不完整的研究设计)。所有的错误答案都会根据具体任务的要求类型进行详细分析,并根据孩子犯的错误类型进行分类。结果显示,在四年级结束时,相当多的学生没有发展构成阅读理解骨干的技能,基于此,我们得出结论,他们将阅读作为学习和发展工具的能力在一定程度上受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of play interaction in twins with autism spectrum disorder A phenomenological analysis of teacher experiences during professional learning on the implementation of the question formulation technique Scaffolding the learning during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic - secondary school students’ perspective Teachers’ diversity awareness and critical consciousness - sine qua non of social justice in schools Modeling the relationships between transformational leadership, teacher academic optimism, and teacher engagement: Evidence from the Serbian school context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1