Studying Social Representations: an Outsider’s Perspective

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Social Psychology and Society Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17759/sps.2022130302
Российская Федерация
{"title":"Studying Social Representations: an Outsider’s Perspective","authors":"Российская Федерация","doi":"10.17759/sps.2022130302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The aim of this article is a brief look at the current state of development of the theory of social representations (SRs), and a discussion of problematic points of the methodology of the SRs analysis.Background. Over the sixty years of its existence, the theory of SRs has been enriched with new ideas, methodological and methodological techniques to study SR, expanded the ranks of its supporters, who answered open questions and formulated new ones. The article proposes a brief look at the development of the theory of SR and empirical approaches to SRs. The main methods of research of the SRs are discussed.Conclusions. Observing the development of the theory of SRs over the past decade, the authors find new arguments in favor of the idea expressed by G. Breakwell, that the heterogeneity of empirical approaches to SRs turned out to be not a weakness, but a strength of the theory of SRs, by giving this theoretical tradition influence within the framework of social psychology.","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this article is a brief look at the current state of development of the theory of social representations (SRs), and a discussion of problematic points of the methodology of the SRs analysis.Background. Over the sixty years of its existence, the theory of SRs has been enriched with new ideas, methodological and methodological techniques to study SR, expanded the ranks of its supporters, who answered open questions and formulated new ones. The article proposes a brief look at the development of the theory of SR and empirical approaches to SRs. The main methods of research of the SRs are discussed.Conclusions. Observing the development of the theory of SRs over the past decade, the authors find new arguments in favor of the idea expressed by G. Breakwell, that the heterogeneity of empirical approaches to SRs turned out to be not a weakness, but a strength of the theory of SRs, by giving this theoretical tradition influence within the framework of social psychology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究社会表征:一个局外人的视角
目标。本文的目的是简要介绍社会表征理论(SRs)的发展现状,并讨论社会表征分析方法的问题点。在其存在的60多年里,社会责任理论已经丰富了新的思想、方法和方法技术来研究社会责任,扩大了其支持者的队伍,他们回答了开放的问题并制定了新的问题。本文简要介绍了社会责任理论的发展和社会责任的实证方法。讨论了SRs研究的主要方法。观察过去十年来社会责任理论的发展,作者发现了支持G. Breakwell所表达的观点的新论据,即社会责任经验方法的异质性最终不是社会责任理论的弱点,而是社会责任理论的优势,通过在社会心理学的框架内给予这一理论传统影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Social Trust on Worry about the Future in Comparative Cross-Cultural Perspective Attitudes towards Patriotism and Patriotic Self-identity of Russian Students Youth in the Polarization of Russian Society The Contribution of the System Justification to Social Cohesion Procedural Justice as a Factor of Attitudes Toward the Political System: the Role of the Country's Economic Situation The Influence of Prolonged Stressful Situation on World Assumptions, Peculiarities of Thinking and Moral Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1