A Summary of Analytical Methods to Simulate Chemical Treatments in ICD Completed Wells

A. Kaur, R. Stalker, G. Graham, D. Frigo
{"title":"A Summary of Analytical Methods to Simulate Chemical Treatments in ICD Completed Wells","authors":"A. Kaur, R. Stalker, G. Graham, D. Frigo","doi":"10.2118/193542-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) are being increasingly used in complex, heterogeneous reservoirs to make the inflow profile more uniform, delay breakthrough of water and/or gas and limit differential depletion, which can lead to crossflow and other detrimental phenomena. However, ICDs not only alter inflow behaviour: they also affect outflow of fluid during chemical treatments, such as scale squeezes, stimulation, etc., which may be applied periodically during well life.\n Methods to account for the additional flow resistance from ICDs when predicting placement of bullheaded treatments are discussed in this paper, in particular, to evaluate whether a theoretical approach based upon Bernoulli's Theorem leads to sufficiently accurate predictions in the absence of laboratory correlations between pressure drop across the ICD and flow rate. This approach may also become significant where the laboratory calibration might be expected to have changed during well life, such as, under the influence of erosion.\n The paper describes two analytical methods of simulating placement in a multi-zone well in a heterogeneous reservoir in the Middle East: the first is empirical and models the pressure drop using an equation derived from calibration data in the laboratory; the second uses the Bernoulli equation, and is theoretical. For the empirical approach, the laboratory-based pressure-drop/flowrate calibration data were fitted to an equation, with parameters that depended upon the nozzle dimensions. The theoretical approach calculated the pressure drop using the Bernoulli equation for a cylindrical ICD nozzle. Both methods were used to simulate placement of a generic scale-inhibitor squeeze treatment and the corresponding chemical returns for each zone in the well. In general, the differences in the predictions between the two models were found to be very minor, showing that a theoretical approach is sufficiently accurate to design and evaluate chemical treatments in wells fitted with ICDs in most cases.\n This means a very rapid analytical approach can be used to design and evaluate near-wellbore treatments in such wells without resorting to much more complex, numerical-based reservoir simulators, even when calibration data about the ICD performance are not available.","PeriodicalId":11243,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, April 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193542-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) are being increasingly used in complex, heterogeneous reservoirs to make the inflow profile more uniform, delay breakthrough of water and/or gas and limit differential depletion, which can lead to crossflow and other detrimental phenomena. However, ICDs not only alter inflow behaviour: they also affect outflow of fluid during chemical treatments, such as scale squeezes, stimulation, etc., which may be applied periodically during well life. Methods to account for the additional flow resistance from ICDs when predicting placement of bullheaded treatments are discussed in this paper, in particular, to evaluate whether a theoretical approach based upon Bernoulli's Theorem leads to sufficiently accurate predictions in the absence of laboratory correlations between pressure drop across the ICD and flow rate. This approach may also become significant where the laboratory calibration might be expected to have changed during well life, such as, under the influence of erosion. The paper describes two analytical methods of simulating placement in a multi-zone well in a heterogeneous reservoir in the Middle East: the first is empirical and models the pressure drop using an equation derived from calibration data in the laboratory; the second uses the Bernoulli equation, and is theoretical. For the empirical approach, the laboratory-based pressure-drop/flowrate calibration data were fitted to an equation, with parameters that depended upon the nozzle dimensions. The theoretical approach calculated the pressure drop using the Bernoulli equation for a cylindrical ICD nozzle. Both methods were used to simulate placement of a generic scale-inhibitor squeeze treatment and the corresponding chemical returns for each zone in the well. In general, the differences in the predictions between the two models were found to be very minor, showing that a theoretical approach is sufficiently accurate to design and evaluate chemical treatments in wells fitted with ICDs in most cases. This means a very rapid analytical approach can be used to design and evaluate near-wellbore treatments in such wells without resorting to much more complex, numerical-based reservoir simulators, even when calibration data about the ICD performance are not available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICD完井化学处理模拟分析方法综述
流入控制装置(icd)越来越多地用于复杂的非均质油藏,以使流入剖面更加均匀,延迟水和/或气的突破,并限制可能导致横向流动和其他有害现象的差异枯竭。然而,icd不仅会改变流入行为,还会影响化学处理过程中的流体流出,例如,在井的整个生命周期中,可能会周期性地进行压垢、增产等。本文讨论了在预测井口处理位置时考虑ICD额外流动阻力的方法,特别是评估基于伯努利定理的理论方法是否能在缺乏ICD压降与流量之间的实验室相关性的情况下得出足够准确的预测。当实验室校准可能在井的使用寿命期间发生变化时,例如在腐蚀的影响下,这种方法也可能变得重要。本文介绍了两种模拟中东非均质油藏多层井布置的分析方法:第一种是经验方法,利用实验室标定数据推导出的方程来模拟压降;第二种使用伯努利方程,并且是理论性的。对于经验方法,基于实验室的压降/流量校准数据拟合到一个方程中,参数取决于喷嘴尺寸。理论方法采用伯努利方程计算圆柱ICD喷嘴的压降。这两种方法都用于模拟通用阻垢剂挤压处理的放置以及井中每个层的相应化学物质的回收。总的来说,两种模型之间的预测差异非常小,这表明在大多数情况下,理论方法足以准确地设计和评估安装icd的井的化学处理。这意味着,即使没有ICD性能的校准数据,也可以使用非常快速的分析方法来设计和评估此类井的近井处理措施,而无需求助于更复杂的基于数字的油藏模拟器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a Barium Sulphate Scale Inhibitor for Chalk Solid Loaded Conditions Novel Laser-Hydrothermal Apparatus for Nucleation and Inhibition Study of Scale Minerals at Temperatures up to 250°C Effect of Corrosion–Inhibitor Chemistry on the Viscosity and Corrosion Rate of VES-Based Acids What Can We Learn from Analysis of Field Asphaltenes Deposits? Enhancing Product Development Through Knowledge-Based Field-to-Lab-to-Field Approach Novel Non-Aromatic Non-Ionic Surfactants to Target Deep Carbonate Stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1