Does Titling Matter? Evidence from Housing Markets in India

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS Review of Regional Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-07 DOI:10.52324/001c.7993
J. Landry, A. Bento, Somik V. Lall
{"title":"Does Titling Matter? Evidence from Housing Markets in India","authors":"J. Landry, A. Bento, Somik V. Lall","doi":"10.52324/001c.7993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we exploit the plausibly exogenous random relocation of slum dwellers in Pune, India to evaluate whether the provision of a formal title is capitalized into property values. Using propensity score matching methods, which address important sources of bias that are present in conventional Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) hedonic methods, we find no effect of titling. Our results suggest that slum improvements may be sufficient to enhance informal tenure rights and that formalizing those rights with a title has little additional impact. An analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects from titling confirms this conclusion, providing preliminary evidence when titling may complement or substitute for other slum interventions.","PeriodicalId":44865,"journal":{"name":"Review of Regional Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.7993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we exploit the plausibly exogenous random relocation of slum dwellers in Pune, India to evaluate whether the provision of a formal title is capitalized into property values. Using propensity score matching methods, which address important sources of bias that are present in conventional Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) hedonic methods, we find no effect of titling. Our results suggest that slum improvements may be sufficient to enhance informal tenure rights and that formalizing those rights with a title has little additional impact. An analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects from titling confirms this conclusion, providing preliminary evidence when titling may complement or substitute for other slum interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有权重要吗?来自印度房地产市场的证据
在本文中,我们利用印度浦那贫民窟居民貌似外生的随机搬迁来评估提供正式所有权是否被资本化为财产价值。使用倾向得分匹配方法,该方法解决了传统的普通最小二乘(OLS)享乐方法中存在的重要偏差来源,我们发现标题没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,贫民窟的改善可能足以增强非正式的权利人权利,而将这些权利以产权形式正式化几乎没有额外的影响。一项对所有权的异质性治疗效果的分析证实了这一结论,为所有权可以补充或替代其他贫民窟干预措施提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
22.20%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Rural Migration Intent in Nebraska: Evidence from Rural Survey Data Jointly Modeling the Community Capitals and Their Influence on Economic Resilience Knowledge Spillover Effects and Employment Productivity in the Innovative Startups: Evidence from Italy Economic Development Strategies: Taxes, Incentives, and Public Expenditures Religion and Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. Counties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1