Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies: A Study of South African Third-Party Logistics Providers

M. Mvubu, M. J. Naude
{"title":"Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies: A Study of South African Third-Party Logistics Providers","authors":"M. Mvubu, M. J. Naude","doi":"10.25159/1998-8125/6854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the supply chain risk management (SCRM) strategies that South African third-party logistics (3PL) service providers use to mitigate risks, the extent to which they adopt these strategies and the benefits derived thereof. An exploratory and descriptive method technique was adopted. The empirical study comprised of email surveys administered to 398 supply chain managers employed by South African 3PLs. The findings reveal that respondents place greater importance on risk identification than on the other SCRM strategies. Risk assessment attained the lowest rating, implying that 3PL providers placed the least importance on this risk assessment strategy. Risk response and risk monitoring, reporting and control are all adopted to a significantly lesser extent. The findings also revealed that 3PL providers derive significant benefits from all SCRM strategies. A limitation of this study is that not all 3PL providers affiliated with SAAFF participated. In addition, because only members of senior management were included in the study, the opinions of operational and tactical staff were not obtained. The study contributes to the current body of knowledge on SCRM by exploring how 3PL providers in a developing country, such as South Africa, assess supply chain risks, the strategies they have in place to respond to these risks, and the mechanisms in place to monitor and control SCM risks.","PeriodicalId":44582,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/6854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the supply chain risk management (SCRM) strategies that South African third-party logistics (3PL) service providers use to mitigate risks, the extent to which they adopt these strategies and the benefits derived thereof. An exploratory and descriptive method technique was adopted. The empirical study comprised of email surveys administered to 398 supply chain managers employed by South African 3PLs. The findings reveal that respondents place greater importance on risk identification than on the other SCRM strategies. Risk assessment attained the lowest rating, implying that 3PL providers placed the least importance on this risk assessment strategy. Risk response and risk monitoring, reporting and control are all adopted to a significantly lesser extent. The findings also revealed that 3PL providers derive significant benefits from all SCRM strategies. A limitation of this study is that not all 3PL providers affiliated with SAAFF participated. In addition, because only members of senior management were included in the study, the opinions of operational and tactical staff were not obtained. The study contributes to the current body of knowledge on SCRM by exploring how 3PL providers in a developing country, such as South Africa, assess supply chain risks, the strategies they have in place to respond to these risks, and the mechanisms in place to monitor and control SCM risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链风险管理策略:南非第三方物流供应商研究
本研究的目的是确定南非第三方物流(3PL)服务提供商用于降低风险的供应链风险管理(SCRM)策略,他们采用这些策略的程度及其带来的好处。采用探索性和描述性的方法技术。实证研究包括对南非第三方物流公司雇用的398名供应链经理进行电子邮件调查。调查结果显示,受访者认为风险识别比其他SCRM策略更重要。风险评估获得了最低的评级,这意味着第三方物流提供商对这种风险评估策略的重视程度最低。风险响应和风险监测、报告和控制的采用程度都明显较低。研究结果还显示,第三方物流供应商从所有SCRM策略中获得了显著的好处。本研究的一个局限性是,并非所有隶属SAAFF的第三方物流供应商都参与了研究。此外,由于研究只包括高级管理人员,因此没有获得业务和战术工作人员的意见。该研究通过探索发展中国家(如南非)的第三方物流供应商如何评估供应链风险,他们应对这些风险的策略,以及监测和控制供应链风险的机制,为当前的供应链管理知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Student Entrepreneurship Support at South African Public Universities: An Ecosystem Perspective Improving Automotive Component Supplier Service through Physical Distribution Activities to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) The Role of Social Network Brand Personality in a Consumer-Brand Relational Model Value Network Configuration and Competitiveness of Emerging Agricultural Cooperatives in the Central Free State of South Africa Incubate-Based Challenges and Deficiencies to Successful Business Incubation in Northern Cape, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1