An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818
Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright , Yi-Shan Tsai , Hendrik Drachsler , Maren Scheffel , Dragan Gašević
{"title":"An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services","authors":"Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Hendrik Drachsler ,&nbsp;Maren Scheffel ,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For service implementations to be widely adopted, it is necessary for the expectations of the key stakeholders to be considered. Failure to do so may lead to services reflecting ideological gaps, which will inadvertently create dissatisfaction among its users. Learning analytics research has begun to recognise the importance of understanding the student perspective towards the services that could be potentially offered; however, student engagement remains low. Furthermore, there has been no attempt to explore whether students can be segmented into different groups based on their expectations towards learning analytics services. In doing so, it allows for a greater understanding of what is and is not expected from learning analytics services within a sample of students. The current exploratory work addresses this limitation by using the three-step approach to latent class analysis to understand whether student expectations of learning analytics services can clearly be segmented, using self-report data obtained from a sample of students at an Open University in the Netherlands. The findings show that student expectations regarding ethical and privacy elements of a learning analytics service are consistent across all groups; however, those expectations of service features are quite variable. These results are discussed in relation to previous work on student stakeholder perspectives, policy development, and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751621000270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

For service implementations to be widely adopted, it is necessary for the expectations of the key stakeholders to be considered. Failure to do so may lead to services reflecting ideological gaps, which will inadvertently create dissatisfaction among its users. Learning analytics research has begun to recognise the importance of understanding the student perspective towards the services that could be potentially offered; however, student engagement remains low. Furthermore, there has been no attempt to explore whether students can be segmented into different groups based on their expectations towards learning analytics services. In doing so, it allows for a greater understanding of what is and is not expected from learning analytics services within a sample of students. The current exploratory work addresses this limitation by using the three-step approach to latent class analysis to understand whether student expectations of learning analytics services can clearly be segmented, using self-report data obtained from a sample of students at an Open University in the Netherlands. The findings show that student expectations regarding ethical and privacy elements of a learning analytics service are consistent across all groups; however, those expectations of service features are quite variable. These results are discussed in relation to previous work on student stakeholder perspectives, policy development, and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对学习分析服务期望的探索性潜类分析
为了使服务实现得到广泛采用,有必要考虑关键涉众的期望。如果做不到这一点,可能会导致服务反映出意识形态的差距,这将在不经意间引起用户的不满。学习分析研究已经开始认识到理解学生对可能提供的服务的看法的重要性;然而,学生的参与度仍然很低。此外,没有人试图探索是否可以根据学生对学习分析服务的期望将他们划分为不同的群体。在这样做的过程中,它允许更好地理解学生样本中学习分析服务的期望和不期望。目前的探索性工作通过使用三步潜类分析方法来解决这一限制,以了解学生对学习分析服务的期望是否可以清晰地分割,使用从荷兰开放大学的学生样本中获得的自我报告数据。调查结果表明,学生对学习分析服务的道德和隐私元素的期望在所有群体中都是一致的;然而,对服务特性的期望变化很大。这些结果与之前关于学生利益相关者观点、政策制定和欧洲通用数据保护条例(GDPR)的工作有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory study of an AI-supported discussion representational tool for online collaborative learning in a Chinese university Editorial Board Exploring the influential factors of online professional learning completion of college teachers from the Global South in an international training program Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1