Differentiation of paediatric burn injury by household energy source in South Africa

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Energy in Southern Africa Pub Date : 2020-06-14 DOI:10.17159/2413-3051/2020/v31i1a8096
R. Govender, D. Kimemia, N. Hornsby, A. van Niekerk
{"title":"Differentiation of paediatric burn injury by household energy source in South Africa","authors":"R. Govender, D. Kimemia, N. Hornsby, A. van Niekerk","doi":"10.17159/2413-3051/2020/v31i1a8096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burn injuries remain a significant cause of death and disability in the global south, with children amongst the most vulnerable. In South Africa, burns are a critical health and economic burden in densely populated and energy-impoverished communities. This study used secondary data on burn injuries from 19 health facilities to differentiate between risk for scalds and flame burns across three household energy sources (firewood, paraffin and electricity). The sample was 2 933 cases of child burn victims, with key analytical procedures being descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis. Results showed that 52% of burn injury admissions reported electricity as the household energy source used at the time of injury. Most burn injuries were scalds (85.3%), with infants and toddlers at greatest risk. The differentiation between wood and paraffin was associated with a threefold increase in scalds relative to flame burns, while that between paraffin and electricity indicated a sevenfold increase in scalds and nineteen times such an increase between wood and electricity. This was an indication of continued challenges for the country in addressing paediatric burns despite, and in the context of, the continued electrification of poor households. The study recommends improved regulation of electrical appliances used by low-income households, and targeted household safety education initiatives.","PeriodicalId":15666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy in Southern Africa","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2020/v31i1a8096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Burn injuries remain a significant cause of death and disability in the global south, with children amongst the most vulnerable. In South Africa, burns are a critical health and economic burden in densely populated and energy-impoverished communities. This study used secondary data on burn injuries from 19 health facilities to differentiate between risk for scalds and flame burns across three household energy sources (firewood, paraffin and electricity). The sample was 2 933 cases of child burn victims, with key analytical procedures being descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis. Results showed that 52% of burn injury admissions reported electricity as the household energy source used at the time of injury. Most burn injuries were scalds (85.3%), with infants and toddlers at greatest risk. The differentiation between wood and paraffin was associated with a threefold increase in scalds relative to flame burns, while that between paraffin and electricity indicated a sevenfold increase in scalds and nineteen times such an increase between wood and electricity. This was an indication of continued challenges for the country in addressing paediatric burns despite, and in the context of, the continued electrification of poor households. The study recommends improved regulation of electrical appliances used by low-income households, and targeted household safety education initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非儿童烧伤的家庭能源分化
在全球南方,烧伤仍然是造成死亡和残疾的一个重要原因,其中儿童是最脆弱的。在南非,在人口密集和能源匮乏的社区,烧伤是一个严重的健康和经济负担。本研究使用了来自19个卫生机构的烧伤二级数据,以区分三种家庭能源(木柴、石蜡和电力)的烫伤和火焰烧伤风险。样本为2933例烧伤儿童,主要分析方法为描述性统计和logistic回归分析。结果显示,52%的烧伤入院者报告说,受伤时使用的家庭能源是电。大多数烧伤是烫伤(85.3%),婴幼儿的风险最大。木材和石蜡的区别表明,相对于火焰燃烧,烫伤的发生率增加了三倍,而石蜡和电的区别表明,烫伤的发生率增加了七倍,木材和电的区别表明,烫伤的发生率增加了十九倍。这表明,尽管贫困家庭继续通电,而且在此背景下,该国在解决儿科烧伤问题方面仍面临挑战。该研究建议加强对低收入家庭使用的电器的监管,并有针对性地开展家庭安全教育活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal has a regional focus on southern Africa. Manuscripts that are accepted for consideration to publish in the journal must address energy issues in southern Africa or have a clear component relevant to southern Africa, including research that was set-up or designed in the region. The southern African region is considered to be constituted by the following fifteen (15) countries: Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Within this broad field of energy research, topics of particular interest include energy efficiency, modelling, renewable energy, poverty, sustainable development, climate change mitigation, energy security, energy policy, energy governance, markets, technology and innovation.
期刊最新文献
Modelling NO2 emissions from Eskom’s coal fired power stations using Generalised Linear Models Trend analysis and inter-annual variability in wind speed in South Africa Commercialization of green hydrogen production from kraal manure in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A review Investigation of Wind Data Resolution for Small Wind Turbine Performance Study Socio-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic-based mini-grids in rural communities: A Ugandan case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1