Fostering 21st Century Skills in Student-Centered Engineering Education at the Secondary School Level: Second Evaluation of The Learning Office

Dominik Dolezal, A. Posekany, L. Vittori, G. Koppensteiner, R. Motschnig
{"title":"Fostering 21st Century Skills in Student-Centered Engineering Education at the Secondary School Level: Second Evaluation of The Learning Office","authors":"Dominik Dolezal, A. Posekany, L. Vittori, G. Koppensteiner, R. Motschnig","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Research to Practice Full Paper represents the second comprehensive evaluation of the learning office, a pilot project introduced at a higher technical secondary school. The project has reached its third year and encompasses six of our twelve cohorts from grade 9 to grade 11. Students taking part in the learning office project have a more flexible course schedule, allowing them to choose time and scope for almost all of their school subject with some restrictions.The results revealed that the dropout rate could be reduced from 54% to 40% in the learning office over the first two years and also confirmed previous evaluations showing that students choosing the learning office approach struggle in their first year due to the change of systems. However, after they passed the first year, the overall subject-specific learning outcome shows no noteworthy differences. The learning office students of grade 11 even slightly outperformed their control group in some regards. This suggests that once the learning office students adapted to the new system, their gain in transversal, personal, and social skills do not happen at the cost of subject-specific competences, but is an additional asset improving our students’ qualification to meet the challenges of tomorrow.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This Research to Practice Full Paper represents the second comprehensive evaluation of the learning office, a pilot project introduced at a higher technical secondary school. The project has reached its third year and encompasses six of our twelve cohorts from grade 9 to grade 11. Students taking part in the learning office project have a more flexible course schedule, allowing them to choose time and scope for almost all of their school subject with some restrictions.The results revealed that the dropout rate could be reduced from 54% to 40% in the learning office over the first two years and also confirmed previous evaluations showing that students choosing the learning office approach struggle in their first year due to the change of systems. However, after they passed the first year, the overall subject-specific learning outcome shows no noteworthy differences. The learning office students of grade 11 even slightly outperformed their control group in some regards. This suggests that once the learning office students adapted to the new system, their gain in transversal, personal, and social skills do not happen at the cost of subject-specific competences, but is an additional asset improving our students’ qualification to meet the challenges of tomorrow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以学生为中心的中学工程教育中培养21世纪技能:学习办公室的第二次评价
本论文是对某高等中专学校试点项目学习型办公室的第二次综合评价。这个项目已经进入了第三个年头,涵盖了9年级到11年级的12个班级中的6个。参加学习办公室项目的学生有一个更灵活的课程安排,允许他们在一些限制下选择几乎所有学校科目的时间和范围。结果显示,在学习办公室的头两年里,辍学率可以从54%降低到40%,并且也证实了之前的评价,即选择学习办公室的学生在第一年因为制度的变化而挣扎。然而,在他们过了第一年之后,各学科的整体学习结果并没有显示出显著的差异。学习办公室的11年级学生在某些方面甚至略优于对照组。这表明,一旦学习办公室的学生适应了新系统,他们在横向、个人和社交技能方面的收获不会以牺牲特定学科的能力为代价,而是一项额外的资产,可以提高我们学生的资格,以迎接未来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning professional software development skills by contributing to Open Source projects Development of a teaching plan to support learning activities of exploratory test design and execution Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering Impact on Second Language Writing via an Intelligent Writing Assistant and Metacognitive Training CURUMIM: A Proposal of an Intelligent Tutor System to Teach Trigonometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1