Cleaning efficacy of anti-soiling coatings

Sonali Bhaduri, Makr Farkade, Rohan Bajhal, L. Kazmerski, S. Mallick, N. Shiradkar, A. Kottantharayil
{"title":"Cleaning efficacy of anti-soiling coatings","authors":"Sonali Bhaduri, Makr Farkade, Rohan Bajhal, L. Kazmerski, S. Mallick, N. Shiradkar, A. Kottantharayil","doi":"10.1109/PVSC45281.2020.9300697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dust deposition on photovoltaic module can reduce energy generation up to 50% if not cleaned for 4 months in Mumbai, India (warm and humid climate). Hydrophobic (contact angle> 90°) anti-soiling coating (ASC) is a cost-effective mitigation strategy to reduce soiling. In this paper, we compared the cleaning efficacy of 4 different commercial hydrophobic anti-soiling coatings (on solar glass and PV modules) with a not-coated sample. All coated glass samples (A, B, C and D) showed higher cleaning efficacy (lower soiling loss) than the not-coated glass sample after cleaning with a 45 µl deionized water droplet. This was also confirmed by field exposure study done on PV modules (for coating B,C and D). Cleaning efficacy of the coating D (on PV module) decreased significantly after 2nd manual cleaning run, indicating abrasion caused by the cleaning tool, implying that the selection of cleaning methods/tools is critical. Under controlled environment (on solar glass) cleaning efficacy of all coated glass samples reduced by a factor of 6 (average) as the rolling water droplet travels from top to bottom, covering a total distance of 3.6 cm, This is due to the reduction in speed of the water droplet rolling off the surface as it accumulates more dust. Roll of angle for clean coated glass increases by a factor of 2 (for coating A,C and D) when measured on dust deposited glass substrate, indicating that roll-off angle depends on the surface of the ASC coatings, which may vary with exposure time and environmental conditions like soiling rate. Ranking of cleaning efficacy of ASC under field exposure correlated well with the roll-off angle measured on soiled samples in controlled experiments. This suggest roll - off angle as an important measure for the evaluation of the anti-soiling coatings.","PeriodicalId":6773,"journal":{"name":"2020 47th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0105-0108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 47th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC45281.2020.9300697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dust deposition on photovoltaic module can reduce energy generation up to 50% if not cleaned for 4 months in Mumbai, India (warm and humid climate). Hydrophobic (contact angle> 90°) anti-soiling coating (ASC) is a cost-effective mitigation strategy to reduce soiling. In this paper, we compared the cleaning efficacy of 4 different commercial hydrophobic anti-soiling coatings (on solar glass and PV modules) with a not-coated sample. All coated glass samples (A, B, C and D) showed higher cleaning efficacy (lower soiling loss) than the not-coated glass sample after cleaning with a 45 µl deionized water droplet. This was also confirmed by field exposure study done on PV modules (for coating B,C and D). Cleaning efficacy of the coating D (on PV module) decreased significantly after 2nd manual cleaning run, indicating abrasion caused by the cleaning tool, implying that the selection of cleaning methods/tools is critical. Under controlled environment (on solar glass) cleaning efficacy of all coated glass samples reduced by a factor of 6 (average) as the rolling water droplet travels from top to bottom, covering a total distance of 3.6 cm, This is due to the reduction in speed of the water droplet rolling off the surface as it accumulates more dust. Roll of angle for clean coated glass increases by a factor of 2 (for coating A,C and D) when measured on dust deposited glass substrate, indicating that roll-off angle depends on the surface of the ASC coatings, which may vary with exposure time and environmental conditions like soiling rate. Ranking of cleaning efficacy of ASC under field exposure correlated well with the roll-off angle measured on soiled samples in controlled experiments. This suggest roll - off angle as an important measure for the evaluation of the anti-soiling coatings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防污涂料的清洁效果
在印度孟买(温暖潮湿的气候),如果4个月不清洁,光伏组件上的灰尘沉积可以减少高达50%的发电量。疏水(接触角> 90°)防污涂层(ASC)是一种经济有效的防污策略。在本文中,我们比较了4种不同的商业疏水防污涂层(在太阳能玻璃和光伏组件上)与未涂膜样品的清洁效果。用45µl去离子水清洗后,所有镀膜玻璃样品(A、B、C和D)都比未镀膜玻璃样品具有更高的清洁效率(更低的污染损失)。光伏组件(涂层B、C和D)的现场暴露研究也证实了这一点。在第二次人工清洁后,涂层D(光伏组件)的清洁效果显著下降,表明清洁工具造成了磨损,这意味着清洁方法/工具的选择至关重要。在受控环境下(在太阳能玻璃上),所有镀膜玻璃样品的清洁效率降低了6倍(平均),因为滚动的水滴从上到下移动,覆盖的总距离为3.6厘米,这是由于水滴从表面滚动的速度降低,因为它积累了更多的灰尘。当在灰尘沉积的玻璃基板上测量时,清洁涂层玻璃的滚转角增加了2倍(对于涂层a,C和D),这表明滚转角取决于ASC涂层的表面,它可能随着暴露时间和污染率等环境条件而变化。田间暴露条件下ASC的清洁效果排名与对照试验中对污染样品测得的滚转角有良好的相关性。建议将滚转角作为评价防污涂料性能的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical Characterization of Defects in High-efficiency (Ag, Cu)(In, Ga)Se2 Optimization of Light-Induced Al Plating on Si for Substitution of Ag in Si Solar Cells Development of 2-sided polysilicon passivating contacts for co-plated bifacial n-PERT cells Potential of Solar Energy in Africa: Does Knowledge, Technology, Policy and Economic Match Investigating Degradation in Perovskite and Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells Using Spatially and Spectrally-Resolved Absorptivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1