The collective securitization of aviation in the European Union through association with terrorism

Q1 Arts and Humanities Russia in Global Affairs Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/23340460.2021.2002099
C. Kaunert, B. Callander, Sarah Léonard
{"title":"The collective securitization of aviation in the European Union through association with terrorism","authors":"C. Kaunert, B. Callander, Sarah Léonard","doi":"10.1080/23340460.2021.2002099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the expansion of European Union cooperation on aviation security using the framework of collective securitization. It establishes how 9/11 was a precipitating event that put terrorism and aviation security in the spotlight. 9/11 changed the collectively held understanding of the security threat posed by terrorism sufficiently to establish aviation security as a common policy framework rather than a national issue. 9/11 was therefore used by EU actors to convince the EU Member States that they all faced one collective terrorist threat. The subsequent institutionalization of this cooperation contributed to a routinization of aviation practices in the EU. As a result of the association between terrorism and aviation, 9/11 pushed EU Member States into taking action on aviation security. This caused the Member States to acknowledge the need for both the highest possible standards of aviation security and the harmonized enforcement of these standards.","PeriodicalId":36949,"journal":{"name":"Russia in Global Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":"669 - 686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia in Global Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.2002099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses the expansion of European Union cooperation on aviation security using the framework of collective securitization. It establishes how 9/11 was a precipitating event that put terrorism and aviation security in the spotlight. 9/11 changed the collectively held understanding of the security threat posed by terrorism sufficiently to establish aviation security as a common policy framework rather than a national issue. 9/11 was therefore used by EU actors to convince the EU Member States that they all faced one collective terrorist threat. The subsequent institutionalization of this cooperation contributed to a routinization of aviation practices in the EU. As a result of the association between terrorism and aviation, 9/11 pushed EU Member States into taking action on aviation security. This caused the Member States to acknowledge the need for both the highest possible standards of aviation security and the harmonized enforcement of these standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过与恐怖主义的联系,欧洲联盟的航空集体证券化
本文以集体安全化为框架,分析了欧盟航空安全合作的拓展。它确立了9/11事件是如何将恐怖主义和航空安全置于聚光灯下的突发事件。9/11事件改变了人们对恐怖主义构成的安全威胁的普遍认识,足以使航空安全成为一个共同的政策框架,而不是一个国家问题。因此,9/11事件被欧盟行动者用来说服欧盟成员国,他们都面临着共同的恐怖主义威胁。随后这种合作的制度化促进了欧盟航空惯例的常规化。由于恐怖主义与航空之间的联系,9/11事件促使欧盟成员国在航空安全方面采取行动。这使会员国认识到需要尽可能高的航空安全标准和统一执行这些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russia in Global Affairs
Russia in Global Affairs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Arabs and the Silent Support for Russia Russia-South Korea Relations: On Bumpy Parallel Roads Between Two Special Operations Talking Politics: Vladimir Putin’s Narrative on Contemporary History (2019-2022) Russian Foreign-Policy Culture and the Horde: A Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1