Radical flexibility: driving for Lyft and the future of work in the platform economy

M. Chihara
{"title":"Radical flexibility: driving for Lyft and the future of work in the platform economy","authors":"M. Chihara","doi":"10.1080/1600910X.2021.1972324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Labour conditions in the first two decades of the twenty-first century in the US have become increasingly precarious and abusive. At the same time, many workers and users (no longer easily categorically separated) exhibit a sustained attachment to the idea of flexible work. For workers, internalizing the demand to be flexible as an affirmative choice can be a method of survival. But the demand for flexibility is also connected to an affective sense of agency and a refusal of alienation. For workers, flexibility connects strong convenience with access to fast cash. It connects a sense of play and creative fun with access to infrastructure and transit. The ‘unicorn’ rideshare company Lyft's brand narrative has capitalized on and exploited the desire for flexibility in historically specific political contexts. In light of these sticky financialized appropriations of flexibility, this essay imagines radical flexibility as a wilful re-appropriation. It explores ways that Lyft's rhetoric might be redirected and resisted. In light of existing demands for collective or cooperative platforms, radical flexibility could be a galvanizing justification for a cooperative response to the Uberization of work, part of a broader horizon that reclaims flexibility, play, creativity, and convenience as affects and practices outside of the wage relation.","PeriodicalId":42670,"journal":{"name":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2021.1972324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Labour conditions in the first two decades of the twenty-first century in the US have become increasingly precarious and abusive. At the same time, many workers and users (no longer easily categorically separated) exhibit a sustained attachment to the idea of flexible work. For workers, internalizing the demand to be flexible as an affirmative choice can be a method of survival. But the demand for flexibility is also connected to an affective sense of agency and a refusal of alienation. For workers, flexibility connects strong convenience with access to fast cash. It connects a sense of play and creative fun with access to infrastructure and transit. The ‘unicorn’ rideshare company Lyft's brand narrative has capitalized on and exploited the desire for flexibility in historically specific political contexts. In light of these sticky financialized appropriations of flexibility, this essay imagines radical flexibility as a wilful re-appropriation. It explores ways that Lyft's rhetoric might be redirected and resisted. In light of existing demands for collective or cooperative platforms, radical flexibility could be a galvanizing justification for a cooperative response to the Uberization of work, part of a broader horizon that reclaims flexibility, play, creativity, and convenience as affects and practices outside of the wage relation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极大的灵活性:为Lyft开车,以及平台经济下的未来工作
在二十一世纪的头二十年,美国的劳动条件变得越来越不稳定和虐待。与此同时,许多工人和用户(不再容易被分类分开)对灵活工作的观念表现出持久的依恋。对于工人来说,将灵活的需求内在化,作为一种肯定的选择,可能是一种生存方法。但对灵活性的需求也与一种情感上的能动性和对疏离感的拒绝有关。对于员工来说,灵活性将强大的便利性与快速获得现金联系起来。它将游戏感和创造性的乐趣与基础设施和交通联系起来。“独角兽”拼车公司Lyft的品牌叙事充分利用了历史上特定政治背景下人们对灵活性的渴望。鉴于这些对灵活性的粘性金融化拨款,本文将激进的灵活性想象为一种故意的重新拨款。它探讨了Lyft的言论可能会被转向和抵制的方式。鉴于对集体或合作平台的现有需求,激进的灵活性可能成为对工作优步化的合作回应的激励理由,这是更广阔视野的一部分,它将灵活性、娱乐、创造力和便利作为工资关系之外的影响和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Special issue: the elements of theorizing The end (and persistence) of subjectivity: Lukács with Adorno, Adorno with Lukács Totality and incoherence: for a shared project of novel theory and black studies Thinking hegemony otherwise – an educational critique of Mouffe’s agonism (Re)search results: search engines and the logic of efficiency in scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1