Chemotherapy Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients Initially Diagnosed With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Scott J. Johnson , Rachael A. Sorg , Rohit D. Borker , Mei Sheng Duh
{"title":"Chemotherapy Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients Initially Diagnosed With Advanced Ovarian Cancer","authors":"Scott J. Johnson ,&nbsp;Rachael A. Sorg ,&nbsp;Rohit D. Borker ,&nbsp;Mei Sheng Duh","doi":"10.1016/j.cogc.2013.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over the past decade, chemotherapy treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer has expanded, with platinum-based and taxane therapy remaining the backbone. Elderly patients have received little attention, and less is known about the variation and duration of agents elderly women receive for first-line, maintenance, and second-line therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Using SEER linked to Medicare claims data, we identified a cohort of women (older than 65 years) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received first-line and/or maintenance therapy between 2003-2009. Over the same period, we identified women who received second-line therapy. We examined the variety of cytotoxic regimens and duration of therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the patient group, 10,695 patients were eligible for chemotherapy, and 5357 had evidence of receiving any chemotherapy. The first-line sample included 2509 patients, the maintenance sample included 306 patients, and the second-line sample included 1890 patients. Among first-line patients, paclitaxel and carboplatin was the most common regimen. Approximately half of the patients did not successfully complete first-line treatment. Of those eligible for maintenance therapy, about one-quarter of the patients initiated a maintenance regimen, and approximately 10% of those who initiated maintenance therapy completed at least 40 weeks. The most common second-line treatment included platinum-based and taxane therapy, if the patient was platinum-sensitive, or a single-agent anthracycline therapy otherwise.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Additional research should address low first-line treatment completion rates. Most patients eligible for maintenance therapy do not initiate it, and multiple treatment strategies predominate in second-line therapy. There remains a substantial unmet need in therapy options for ovarian cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 67-77.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2013.02.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955313000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Over the past decade, chemotherapy treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer has expanded, with platinum-based and taxane therapy remaining the backbone. Elderly patients have received little attention, and less is known about the variation and duration of agents elderly women receive for first-line, maintenance, and second-line therapy.

Patients and Methods

Using SEER linked to Medicare claims data, we identified a cohort of women (older than 65 years) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received first-line and/or maintenance therapy between 2003-2009. Over the same period, we identified women who received second-line therapy. We examined the variety of cytotoxic regimens and duration of therapy.

Results

In the patient group, 10,695 patients were eligible for chemotherapy, and 5357 had evidence of receiving any chemotherapy. The first-line sample included 2509 patients, the maintenance sample included 306 patients, and the second-line sample included 1890 patients. Among first-line patients, paclitaxel and carboplatin was the most common regimen. Approximately half of the patients did not successfully complete first-line treatment. Of those eligible for maintenance therapy, about one-quarter of the patients initiated a maintenance regimen, and approximately 10% of those who initiated maintenance therapy completed at least 40 weeks. The most common second-line treatment included platinum-based and taxane therapy, if the patient was platinum-sensitive, or a single-agent anthracycline therapy otherwise.

Conclusion

Additional research should address low first-line treatment completion rates. Most patients eligible for maintenance therapy do not initiate it, and multiple treatment strategies predominate in second-line therapy. There remains a substantial unmet need in therapy options for ovarian cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期诊断为晚期卵巢癌的老年患者的化疗模式
在过去的十年中,晚期卵巢癌患者的化疗治疗已经扩大,以铂类和紫杉烷类治疗仍然是主要的治疗方法。老年患者很少受到关注,对于老年妇女接受一线、维持和二线治疗的药物的变化和持续时间也知之甚少。患者和方法:使用与医疗保险索赔数据相关的SEER,我们确定了一组在2003-2009年期间接受一线和/或维持治疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌妇女(65岁以上)。在同一时期,我们确定了接受二线治疗的妇女。我们检查了各种细胞毒性方案和治疗时间。结果患者组符合化疗条件的有10695例,有接受化疗证据的有5357例。一线样本2509例,维持样本306例,二线样本1890例。在一线患者中,紫杉醇加卡铂是最常见的方案。大约一半的患者没有成功完成一线治疗。在符合维持治疗条件的患者中,大约四分之一的患者开始了维持治疗方案,大约10%的开始维持治疗的患者完成了至少40周。如果患者对铂敏感,最常见的二线治疗包括铂基和紫杉烷治疗,否则采用单药蒽环类药物治疗。结论针对一线治疗完成率低的问题需要进一步的研究。大多数符合维持治疗条件的患者不启动它,多种治疗策略在二线治疗中占主导地位。在卵巢癌的治疗选择方面仍有大量未满足的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Epigenetic Pathways Offer Targets for Ovarian Cancer Treatment Table of Contents Editorial Board A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping Genetic Cancer Ovary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1