The Predicament of FinTechs in the Environment of Traditional Banking Sector Regulation – An Analysis of Regulatory Sandboxes as a Possible Solution

Q4 Social Sciences Credit and Capital Markets Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.3790/ccm.52.3.323
Johannes M. Gerlach, Daniel Rugilo
{"title":"The Predicament of FinTechs in the Environment of Traditional Banking Sector Regulation – An Analysis of Regulatory Sandboxes as a Possible Solution","authors":"Johannes M. Gerlach, Daniel Rugilo","doi":"10.3790/ccm.52.3.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n Recently, “Financial Technology-companies” (FinTechs) are increasingly changing the financial services industry worldwide and impose considerable challenges for regulators tasked to solve the arising trade-off between sound regulation and innovation support. In this regard, regulatory sandboxes, which were recently introduced in several jurisdictions, provide a promising solution, as they imply a liberalization of regulatory requirements in order to enable FinTechs to test their innovative services. However, we observe that no comparable initiative exists in Germany, even though the German regulator identified a need for action on this subject in order to maintain its international competitiveness. Thus, based on a detailed analysis of various sandbox models worldwide, this paper develops a set of own recommendations as a basis for the implementation of a sandbox concept which might be applicable in the German regulatory environment. In doing so, we identify current theoretical as well as practical regulatory issues within the context of the rapid FinTech evolution. To the best of our knowledge, this paper represents the first study on key international sandboxes as a basis to design guidelines specifically for the German financial market. Thereby, we contribute to the literature as we evolve an effective regulation within the new setting of innovative financial technologies. Moreover, our findings contribute to the practical solution of current challenges faced by both regulators and affected companies. Even though our derived implications focus on the German financial sector, the results may potentially be applicable in further jurisdictions with similar regulatory requirements.\n JEL Classification: G21, G28, M13","PeriodicalId":36966,"journal":{"name":"Credit and Capital Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Credit and Capital Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.52.3.323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Recently, “Financial Technology-companies” (FinTechs) are increasingly changing the financial services industry worldwide and impose considerable challenges for regulators tasked to solve the arising trade-off between sound regulation and innovation support. In this regard, regulatory sandboxes, which were recently introduced in several jurisdictions, provide a promising solution, as they imply a liberalization of regulatory requirements in order to enable FinTechs to test their innovative services. However, we observe that no comparable initiative exists in Germany, even though the German regulator identified a need for action on this subject in order to maintain its international competitiveness. Thus, based on a detailed analysis of various sandbox models worldwide, this paper develops a set of own recommendations as a basis for the implementation of a sandbox concept which might be applicable in the German regulatory environment. In doing so, we identify current theoretical as well as practical regulatory issues within the context of the rapid FinTech evolution. To the best of our knowledge, this paper represents the first study on key international sandboxes as a basis to design guidelines specifically for the German financial market. Thereby, we contribute to the literature as we evolve an effective regulation within the new setting of innovative financial technologies. Moreover, our findings contribute to the practical solution of current challenges faced by both regulators and affected companies. Even though our derived implications focus on the German financial sector, the results may potentially be applicable in further jurisdictions with similar regulatory requirements. JEL Classification: G21, G28, M13
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统银行业监管环境下金融科技的困境——监管沙盒的可能解决方案分析
最近,“金融科技公司”(FinTechs)正日益改变全球金融服务行业,并给监管机构带来了相当大的挑战,监管机构的任务是解决健全监管与创新支持之间出现的权衡。在这方面,最近在几个司法管辖区引入的监管沙箱提供了一个有希望的解决方案,因为它们意味着监管要求的自由化,以便金融科技公司能够测试他们的创新服务。然而,我们注意到,德国没有类似的举措,尽管德国监管机构确定需要就这一主题采取行动,以保持其国际竞争力。因此,在对世界各地各种沙盒模型进行详细分析的基础上,本文提出了一套自己的建议,作为实施可能适用于德国监管环境的沙盒概念的基础。在此过程中,我们在金融科技快速发展的背景下确定了当前的理论和实践监管问题。据我们所知,本文代表了第一项关于关键国际沙盒的研究,作为专门为德国金融市场设计指导方针的基础。因此,当我们在创新金融技术的新环境中发展有效的监管时,我们为文献做出了贡献。此外,我们的研究结果有助于解决监管机构和受影响公司当前面临的挑战。尽管我们的推论主要集中在德国金融部门,但结果可能适用于具有类似监管要求的其他司法管辖区。JEL分类:G21, G28, M13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Credit and Capital Markets
Credit and Capital Markets Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
54th Konstanz Seminar on Monetary Theory and Policy 2023 A Novel Default Risk Prediction and Feature Importance Analysis Technique for Marketplace Lending using Machine Learning German FinTech Companies: A Market Overview and Volume Estimates FinTech and the Digital Transformation in the Financial Industry Towards a Theory on Dominant Business Model Emergence of Marketplace Lending in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1