Process safety assessment of new and existing plants

Jim Pikaar, John Braithwaite, Tony Cox
{"title":"Process safety assessment of new and existing plants","authors":"Jim Pikaar,&nbsp;John Braithwaite,&nbsp;Tony Cox","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90127-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Companies of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group operate a very wide range of manufacturing installations which include oil refineries, gas processing and liquefaction plants and chemical plants.</p><p>The safety assessment of these installations is approached from a background of experience. The necessary experience to do this is continously brought to bear in design by involving appropriately selected staff and by applying established guidelines, standards and design/engineering procedures throughout the development of a project. In addition, structured safety reviews are carried out to check that all aspects have been properly dealt with.</p><p>The safety assessment of existing plants follows a pattern of enquiry which is similar to that for new plants.</p><p>Finally the question of residual risk is addressed: in general the assessment of the consequences of a failure scenario is more reliable than the judgement of its probability. Nevertheless there are instances where a closer look at probabilities can help in making design decisions. It is questionable whether risk analysis results can be used meaningfully in an absolute sense to judge the acceptability of an installation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90127-H","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090127H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group operate a very wide range of manufacturing installations which include oil refineries, gas processing and liquefaction plants and chemical plants.

The safety assessment of these installations is approached from a background of experience. The necessary experience to do this is continously brought to bear in design by involving appropriately selected staff and by applying established guidelines, standards and design/engineering procedures throughout the development of a project. In addition, structured safety reviews are carried out to check that all aspects have been properly dealt with.

The safety assessment of existing plants follows a pattern of enquiry which is similar to that for new plants.

Finally the question of residual risk is addressed: in general the assessment of the consequences of a failure scenario is more reliable than the judgement of its probability. Nevertheless there are instances where a closer look at probabilities can help in making design decisions. It is questionable whether risk analysis results can be used meaningfully in an absolute sense to judge the acceptability of an installation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对新建和现有工厂进行工艺安全评估
荷兰皇家/壳牌集团的公司经营着非常广泛的制造设施,包括炼油厂,天然气加工和液化厂以及化工厂。这些设施的安全评估是从经验背景出发的。在整个项目开发过程中,通过适当选择工作人员,并通过采用既定的指导方针、标准和设计/工程程序,不断将必要的经验引入设计中。此外,还进行了结构化的安全审查,以检查各方面是否得到妥善处理。现有工厂的安全评估遵循与新工厂类似的调查模式。最后,讨论了剩余风险的问题:一般来说,对失败情景后果的评估比对其概率的判断更可靠。然而,在某些情况下,仔细观察概率有助于做出设计决策。风险分析结果能否在绝对意义上有意义地用于判断装置的可接受性是值得怀疑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1