Readers, Personal Record Managers, and Community Members: An Exploratory Study of Researchers' Participation in Online Research Information Management Systems

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Library Metadata Pub Date : 2017-04-03 DOI:10.1080/19386389.2017.1348783
Shuheng Wu, Besiki Stvilia, Dong Joon Lee
{"title":"Readers, Personal Record Managers, and Community Members: An Exploratory Study of Researchers' Participation in Online Research Information Management Systems","authors":"Shuheng Wu, Besiki Stvilia, Dong Joon Lee","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2017.1348783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prior studies have identified a need for engaging researchers in providing and curating their identity data. This article reports findings from a qualitative study exploring how researchers use and participate in online research information management (RIM) systems and their requirements for information quality in RIM systems. The purpose of the study was to enhance the knowledge of how to design scalable and reliable solutions for research-identity data curation by examining researchers' motivations for participating in online RIM systems and contributing to research-identity data curation. The findings identify nine activity-related motivations for using RIM systems, five types of information-quality problems in RIM systems, and 12 information-quality criteria that researchers perceived to be important in RIM systems. This study also identified three levels of participation in RIM systems: Readers, Personal Record Managers, and Community Members. Design recommendations were suggested for institutional repositories and RIM systems to provide improved services.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"64 1","pages":"57 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1348783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT Prior studies have identified a need for engaging researchers in providing and curating their identity data. This article reports findings from a qualitative study exploring how researchers use and participate in online research information management (RIM) systems and their requirements for information quality in RIM systems. The purpose of the study was to enhance the knowledge of how to design scalable and reliable solutions for research-identity data curation by examining researchers' motivations for participating in online RIM systems and contributing to research-identity data curation. The findings identify nine activity-related motivations for using RIM systems, five types of information-quality problems in RIM systems, and 12 information-quality criteria that researchers perceived to be important in RIM systems. This study also identified three levels of participation in RIM systems: Readers, Personal Record Managers, and Community Members. Design recommendations were suggested for institutional repositories and RIM systems to provide improved services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
读者、个人档案管理者和社区成员:研究人员参与在线研究信息管理系统的探索性研究
先前的研究已经确定需要参与研究人员提供和管理他们的身份数据。本文报告了一项定性研究的结果,探讨了研究人员如何使用和参与在线研究信息管理(RIM)系统以及他们对RIM系统中信息质量的要求。本研究的目的是通过考察研究人员参与在线RIM系统和为研究身份数据管理做出贡献的动机,提高如何为研究身份数据管理设计可扩展和可靠的解决方案的知识。研究结果确定了使用RIM系统的九种与活动相关的动机,RIM系统中的五种信息质量问题,以及研究者认为在RIM系统中重要的12个信息质量标准。本研究还确定了RIM系统的三个参与层次:读者、个人档案管理员和社区成员。对机构存储库和RIM系统提出了设计建议,以提供改进的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Metadata
Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Metadata Management in Data Lake Environments: A Survey A Minimal Metadata Schema and Its Tool to Improve the Searchableness of Research Data in Bioinformatics Changes in Digital Collections and Their Metadata: A Longitudinal Study of UIUC Digital Library Common Metadata Framework for Research Data Repository: Necessity to Support Open Science Entity Management Using RDA and Wikibase: A Case Study at the National Library of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1