The Impact of US County-Level Factors on COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality.

IF 4.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Recall Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1007/s11524-021-00601-7
Nevo Itzhak, Tomer Shahar, Robert Moskovich, Yuval Shahar
{"title":"The Impact of US County-Level Factors on COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality.","authors":"Nevo Itzhak, Tomer Shahar, Robert Moskovich, Yuval Shahar","doi":"10.1007/s11524-021-00601-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of socio-economic factors, ethnicity, and other factors, on the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 at the sub-population-level, rather than at the individual level, and their temporal dynamics, is only partially understood. Fifty-three county-level features were collected between 4/2020 and 11/2020 from 3,071 US counties from publicly available data of various American government and news websites: ethnicity, socio-economic factors, educational attainment, mask usage, population density, age distribution, COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, presidential election results, and ICU beds. We trained machine learning models that predict COVID-19 mortality and morbidity using county-level features and then performed a SHAP value game theoretic importance analysis of the predictive features for each model. The classifiers produced an AUROC of 0.863 for morbidity prediction and an AUROC of 0.812 for mortality prediction. A SHAP value-based analysis indicated that poverty rate, obesity rate, mean commute time, and mask usage statistics significantly affected morbidity rates, while ethnicity, median income, poverty rate, and education levels heavily influenced mortality rates. Surprisingly, the correlation between several of these factors and COVID-19 morbidity and mortality gradually shifted and even reversed during the study period; our analysis suggests that this phenomenon was probably due to COVID-19 being initially associated with more urbanized areas and, then, from 9/2020, with less urbanized ones. Thus, socio-economic features such as ethnicity, education, and economic disparity are the major factors for predicting county-level COVID-19 mortality rates. Between counties, low variance factors (e.g., age) are not meaningful predictors. The inversion of some correlations over time can be explained by COVID-19 spreading from urban to rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":47046,"journal":{"name":"Recall","volume":"13 1","pages":"562-570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8979577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recall","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00601-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of socio-economic factors, ethnicity, and other factors, on the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 at the sub-population-level, rather than at the individual level, and their temporal dynamics, is only partially understood. Fifty-three county-level features were collected between 4/2020 and 11/2020 from 3,071 US counties from publicly available data of various American government and news websites: ethnicity, socio-economic factors, educational attainment, mask usage, population density, age distribution, COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, presidential election results, and ICU beds. We trained machine learning models that predict COVID-19 mortality and morbidity using county-level features and then performed a SHAP value game theoretic importance analysis of the predictive features for each model. The classifiers produced an AUROC of 0.863 for morbidity prediction and an AUROC of 0.812 for mortality prediction. A SHAP value-based analysis indicated that poverty rate, obesity rate, mean commute time, and mask usage statistics significantly affected morbidity rates, while ethnicity, median income, poverty rate, and education levels heavily influenced mortality rates. Surprisingly, the correlation between several of these factors and COVID-19 morbidity and mortality gradually shifted and even reversed during the study period; our analysis suggests that this phenomenon was probably due to COVID-19 being initially associated with more urbanized areas and, then, from 9/2020, with less urbanized ones. Thus, socio-economic features such as ethnicity, education, and economic disparity are the major factors for predicting county-level COVID-19 mortality rates. Between counties, low variance factors (e.g., age) are not meaningful predictors. The inversion of some correlations over time can be explained by COVID-19 spreading from urban to rural areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国县级因素对 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的影响。
在亚人群层面而非个体层面,社会经济因素、种族和其他因素对 COVID-19 的发病率和死亡率的影响及其时间动态只有部分了解。2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 11 月期间,我们从美国多个政府和新闻网站的公开数据中收集了美国 3071 个县的 53 个县级特征:种族、社会经济因素、教育程度、口罩使用情况、人口密度、年龄分布、COVID-19 发病率和死亡率、总统选举结果和重症监护病房床位。我们利用县级特征训练了预测 COVID-19 死亡率和发病率的机器学习模型,然后对每个模型的预测特征进行了 SHAP 值博弈论重要性分析。分类器预测发病率的 AUROC 为 0.863,预测死亡率的 AUROC 为 0.812。基于 SHAP 值的分析表明,贫困率、肥胖率、平均通勤时间和口罩使用统计数据对发病率有重大影响,而种族、收入中位数、贫困率和教育水平则对死亡率有重大影响。令人惊讶的是,在研究期间,上述几个因素与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率之间的相关性逐渐发生了变化,甚至发生了逆转;我们的分析表明,这种现象可能是由于 COVID-19 最初与城市化程度较高的地区相关,而从 2020 年 9 月开始,又与城市化程度较低的地区相关。因此,种族、教育和经济差距等社会经济特征是预测县级 COVID-19 死亡率的主要因素。在县与县之间,低方差因素(如年龄)不是有意义的预测因素。COVID-19 从城市向农村地区扩散可以解释某些相关性随时间的倒置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recall
Recall Multiple-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Forty-two years of computer-assisted language learning research: A scientometric study of hotspot research and trending issues Different interlocutors, different EFL interactional strategies: A case study of intercultural telecollaborative projects in secondary classrooms Examining the relationships among motivation, informal digital learning of English, and foreign language enjoyment: An explanatory mixed-method study ReCALL editorial September 2023 issue Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi-experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1