EFFICACY OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN EARLY DIABETIC FOOT ULCER MANAGEMENT IN COMPARISON WITH ADVANCED MOIST WOUND THERAPY

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.6231
Naveed Ahmed Sheen, A. Samar, Muhammad Ibrar Butt, Zeeshan Ayub, F. Nadeem
{"title":"EFFICACY OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN EARLY DIABETIC FOOT ULCER MANAGEMENT IN COMPARISON WITH ADVANCED MOIST WOUND THERAPY","authors":"Naveed Ahmed Sheen, A. Samar, Muhammad Ibrar Butt, Zeeshan Ayub, F. Nadeem","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.6231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare negative pressure wound therapy with advanced moist wound therapy in managing early diabetic foot ulcer. \nStudy Design: Quasi-experimental study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jul 2016 to Jun 2018. \nMethodology: A total of 100 patients of diabetic foot ulcer were randomly allocated into two equal groups for the treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and advanced moist wound therapy (AMWT). Ulcers were reassessed after 4 weeks for presence of granulation tissue covering entire ulcer base and reduction of 3 cm in largest diameter of ulcer. \nResults: Mean age of the study participants was 57.08 ± 9.99 years. 33 patients had Wagner grade-I ulcer, while remaining had Wagner grade-II ulcer. Mean ulcer size at presentation was 6.46 ± 1.71 cm. Both study groups were comparable in terms of mean age (p=0.968), wound size at presentation (p=1.000), age (p=0.695), gender (p=1.000) and Wagner ulcer grade (p=0.288). Mean ulcer size was found smaller with negative pressure wound therapy (3.46cm, p=0.061) at follow-up visits. Reduction in ulcer size ≥3cm was achieved frequently with negative pressure wound therapy technique (72.0% vs. 38.0%; p>0.01). Mean healing time was 4.11 ± 1.65 weeks which was lower with negative pressure wound therapy (3.66 weeks vs. 4.56 weeks; p>0.05). Treatment efficacy (healing in ≤4 weeks and ≥3cm reduction in ulcer) was significantly higher with negative pressurewound therapy (72.0% vs. 38.0%; p<0.01) as well. \nConclusion: This study demonstrates superiority of negative pressure wound therapy over advanced moist...............","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.6231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare negative pressure wound therapy with advanced moist wound therapy in managing early diabetic foot ulcer. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jul 2016 to Jun 2018. Methodology: A total of 100 patients of diabetic foot ulcer were randomly allocated into two equal groups for the treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and advanced moist wound therapy (AMWT). Ulcers were reassessed after 4 weeks for presence of granulation tissue covering entire ulcer base and reduction of 3 cm in largest diameter of ulcer. Results: Mean age of the study participants was 57.08 ± 9.99 years. 33 patients had Wagner grade-I ulcer, while remaining had Wagner grade-II ulcer. Mean ulcer size at presentation was 6.46 ± 1.71 cm. Both study groups were comparable in terms of mean age (p=0.968), wound size at presentation (p=1.000), age (p=0.695), gender (p=1.000) and Wagner ulcer grade (p=0.288). Mean ulcer size was found smaller with negative pressure wound therapy (3.46cm, p=0.061) at follow-up visits. Reduction in ulcer size ≥3cm was achieved frequently with negative pressure wound therapy technique (72.0% vs. 38.0%; p>0.01). Mean healing time was 4.11 ± 1.65 weeks which was lower with negative pressure wound therapy (3.66 weeks vs. 4.56 weeks; p>0.05). Treatment efficacy (healing in ≤4 weeks and ≥3cm reduction in ulcer) was significantly higher with negative pressurewound therapy (72.0% vs. 38.0%; p<0.01) as well. Conclusion: This study demonstrates superiority of negative pressure wound therapy over advanced moist...............
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期糖尿病足溃疡负压创面治疗与晚期湿润创面治疗的疗效比较
目的:比较负压创面与先进湿润创面治疗早期糖尿病足溃疡的疗效。研究设计:准实验研究。学习地点和时间:2016年7月至2018年6月,拉瓦尔品第军队联合医院外科。方法:将100例糖尿病足溃疡患者随机分为两组,分别采用负压创面治疗(NPWT)和高级湿润创面治疗(AMWT)。4周后复查溃疡是否有肉芽组织覆盖整个溃疡基底,溃疡最大直径缩小3厘米。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为57.08±9.99岁。33例患者为Wagner i级溃疡,其余患者为Wagner ii级溃疡。溃疡出现时的平均大小为6.46±1.71 cm。两个研究组在平均年龄(p=0.968)、就诊时伤口大小(p=1.000)、年龄(p=0.695)、性别(p=1.000)和瓦格纳溃疡等级(p=0.288)方面具有可比性。随访时发现负压创面治疗组平均溃疡面积较小(3.46cm, p=0.061)。采用负压创面治疗技术,溃疡缩小≥3cm的发生率较高(72.0% vs. 38.0%;p > 0.01)。平均愈合时间为4.11±1.65周,负压创面治疗组较低(3.66周比4.56周;p > 0.05)。负压创面治疗的疗效(愈合≤4周,溃疡缩小≥3cm)显著高于负压创面治疗(72.0% vs. 38.0%;P <0.01)。结论:本研究表明负压创面治疗优于晚期湿润创面...............
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPLICATIONS OF INTRA ABDOMINAL DRAINS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE PATIENT AND OBSERVER SCAR ASSESSMENT FOLLOWING BASAL CELL CARCINOMA SURGERY: MULTICENTER QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Salivary Diagnosis of COVID-19 CHANGE OF NAME BY A PSYCHOTIC PATIENT: IS IT MANIFESTATION OF A PSYCHOPATHOLOGY MISSED UNTIL NOW? PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA MIMICKING TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION - A CASE REPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1