Gender Differences in the Subjective and Objective Markers for Fatigue Associated with Shift Work: A Pilot Study

Hitomi Tatsuta, Chie Ebata, Masayuki Tatmeichi
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Subjective and Objective Markers for Fatigue Associated with Shift Work: A Pilot Study","authors":"Hitomi Tatsuta, Chie Ebata, Masayuki Tatmeichi","doi":"10.4172/2329-6879.1000272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigated if there were differences between men and women, in the indices of fatigue, as a result of shift work. Participants and methods: The participants were 24 nurses (12 men and 12 women), who were performing shift work at a hospital; they were matched by age, working hours and workplace. A self-administered survey was distributed, which included a set of questionnaires on the subjective symptoms and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores for fatigue. In addition, physiological tests (acceleration of pulse waves) and blood tests (reactive oxygen metabolite [d-ROM]; and biological antioxidant potential [BAP] were conducted before and after each of the three different shifts. Results: The subjective symptoms improved after the day and evening shifts, but worsened after the night shifts. For the VAS, the scores decreased after all the shifts; for the night shifts, the changes in the scores in the men were significantly greater than those observed in the women (p=0.001). On comparing the before and after-shift values of the three different shifts, no significant differences were observed for the evening or night shifts, in terms of the acceleration of pulse waves, d-ROM, or BAP. For the acceleration of pulse waves for the day shift, the values were elevated after the shift for men, while it decreased for women. Similarly, the results before and after the work shifts, in terms of BAP, were 184.9 ± 281.9 μmol/L for men and -160.4 ± 307.5 μmol/L for women, showing an increase in the men and a decrease in the women, after the shifts. However, there was no significant gender difference, in terms of the d-ROM. Conclusion: Gender differences were observed in the objective fatigue indicators, in spite of the fact that the mean age of both the men and women was the same and their workplace was the same. It is necessary to conduct future studies to clear support issues for shift working by gender.","PeriodicalId":19397,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated if there were differences between men and women, in the indices of fatigue, as a result of shift work. Participants and methods: The participants were 24 nurses (12 men and 12 women), who were performing shift work at a hospital; they were matched by age, working hours and workplace. A self-administered survey was distributed, which included a set of questionnaires on the subjective symptoms and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores for fatigue. In addition, physiological tests (acceleration of pulse waves) and blood tests (reactive oxygen metabolite [d-ROM]; and biological antioxidant potential [BAP] were conducted before and after each of the three different shifts. Results: The subjective symptoms improved after the day and evening shifts, but worsened after the night shifts. For the VAS, the scores decreased after all the shifts; for the night shifts, the changes in the scores in the men were significantly greater than those observed in the women (p=0.001). On comparing the before and after-shift values of the three different shifts, no significant differences were observed for the evening or night shifts, in terms of the acceleration of pulse waves, d-ROM, or BAP. For the acceleration of pulse waves for the day shift, the values were elevated after the shift for men, while it decreased for women. Similarly, the results before and after the work shifts, in terms of BAP, were 184.9 ± 281.9 μmol/L for men and -160.4 ± 307.5 μmol/L for women, showing an increase in the men and a decrease in the women, after the shifts. However, there was no significant gender difference, in terms of the d-ROM. Conclusion: Gender differences were observed in the objective fatigue indicators, in spite of the fact that the mean age of both the men and women was the same and their workplace was the same. It is necessary to conduct future studies to clear support issues for shift working by gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮班工作相关疲劳的主客观指标的性别差异:一项初步研究
目的:本研究调查了轮班工作是否会导致男性和女性在疲劳指标上存在差异。参与者和方法:参与者为24名在医院轮班工作的护士(12男12女);他们按年龄、工作时间和工作场所进行匹配。一项自我管理的调查被分发,其中包括一套关于主观症状和视觉模拟量表[VAS]疲劳评分的问卷。此外,生理测试(脉搏波加速)和血液测试(活性氧代谢物[- d];以及生物抗氧化潜能(BAP)的测定。结果:白班和夜班后主观症状有所改善,夜班后加重。VAS评分在换班后均有所下降;对于夜班,男性得分的变化明显大于女性(p=0.001)。在比较三个不同班次的前后值时,在脉冲波、- d或BAP的加速方面,夜班和夜班没有观察到显著差异。对于白班的脉搏波加速,男性的值在轮班后升高,而女性的值则下降。同样,轮班前后的BAP值,男性为184.9±281.9 μmol/L,女性为-160.4±307.5 μmol/L,轮班后男性升高,女性降低。然而,在d-ROM方面,没有明显的性别差异。结论:在男女平均年龄相同、工作场所相同的情况下,客观疲劳指标存在性别差异。有必要开展未来的研究,以明确性别轮班工作的支持问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine The Correct Way to Walk Intraoperative Radiation Exposure of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Mismatch Between Concerns and Protection The Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Daytime Sleepiness on Work Performance: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study in a North African Population Noise Induced Work Places and Noise Related Occupational Risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1