A new tariff map of the United States (House of Representatives)

Larry L. Wade, John B. Gates
{"title":"A new tariff map of the United States (House of Representatives)","authors":"Larry L. Wade,&nbsp;John B. Gates","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(90)90028-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the regional basis of US tariff policy as reflected in the 1987 vote in the House of Representatives on the Gephardt Amendment to the 1988 Omnibus Trade Act. The Amendment was a major protectionist proposal that would have reversed the secular trend toward trade liberalization initiated in 1934. There are reasons for expecting that the decline of America's hegemony in the international economy, combined with endogenously-generated changes in the structure of the domestic economy, would alter historic regional cleavages respecting trade policy. The probit estimates indicate that new regional differences have emerged to influence voting behavior in the House on trade policy. The historic regional foundations of trade policy familiar since the early 19th century have been transformed: the North remains the most protectionist region, but the traditionally liberal South now approaches the North in protectionist sentiment, while the once protectionist West, and especially the Northwest, have become predominantly liberal. These effects persist when partisanship and congressional district characteristics are taken into account, and have important implications for the future of American politics and the international trading system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 284-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90028-9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0260982790900289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article examines the regional basis of US tariff policy as reflected in the 1987 vote in the House of Representatives on the Gephardt Amendment to the 1988 Omnibus Trade Act. The Amendment was a major protectionist proposal that would have reversed the secular trend toward trade liberalization initiated in 1934. There are reasons for expecting that the decline of America's hegemony in the international economy, combined with endogenously-generated changes in the structure of the domestic economy, would alter historic regional cleavages respecting trade policy. The probit estimates indicate that new regional differences have emerged to influence voting behavior in the House on trade policy. The historic regional foundations of trade policy familiar since the early 19th century have been transformed: the North remains the most protectionist region, but the traditionally liberal South now approaches the North in protectionist sentiment, while the once protectionist West, and especially the Northwest, have become predominantly liberal. These effects persist when partisanship and congressional district characteristics are taken into account, and have important implications for the future of American politics and the international trading system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国新关税地图(众议院)
本文考察了1987年众议院对1988年综合贸易法案的Gephardt修正案的投票所反映的美国关税政策的区域基础。该修正案是一项主要的保护主义提案,它将扭转1934年开始的贸易自由化的长期趋势。我们有理由期待,美国在国际经济中霸权地位的下降,加上国内经济结构的内生变化,将改变历史上在贸易政策方面的区域分裂。概率估计表明,新的地区差异已经出现,影响了众议院对贸易政策的投票行为。自19世纪初以来熟悉的贸易政策的历史区域基础已经发生了变化:北方仍然是最具保护主义色彩的地区,但传统上自由主义的南方现在在保护主义情绪上接近北方,而曾经的保护主义西方,尤其是西北地区,已经变得主要是自由主义。当考虑到党派和国会选区特征时,这些影响仍然存在,并对美国政治和国际贸易体系的未来产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816–1980 The global environmental movement: Reclaiming paradise The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth The new geopolitics of minerals: Canada and international resource trade Caring for workers' dependents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1