Modernity, Hegemony, and Public Transport as Public Space: A Reading of Alfred Döblin's Berlin Alexanderplatz

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Critique Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1353/cul.2023.0016
Maxwell Woods
{"title":"Modernity, Hegemony, and Public Transport as Public Space: A Reading of Alfred Döblin's Berlin Alexanderplatz","authors":"Maxwell Woods","doi":"10.1353/cul.2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explores through a reading of Alfred Döblin's Berlin Alexanderplatz how public transport as a public space serves as a technology of discipline. First, the article argues that modern subjectivity is articulated at least in part through public transport as a public space. Second, the article outlines how the conception of modernity formed in public transport as a public space requires defining the lumpenproletariat as a constitutive other of modernity insofar as they cannot substantially participate in the public culture of modern public transport. Third, in order to maintain its hegemony, modern culture disciplines the lumpenproletariat into becoming modern subjects by using the public space of modern public transport as a disciplinary technology.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2023.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article explores through a reading of Alfred Döblin's Berlin Alexanderplatz how public transport as a public space serves as a technology of discipline. First, the article argues that modern subjectivity is articulated at least in part through public transport as a public space. Second, the article outlines how the conception of modernity formed in public transport as a public space requires defining the lumpenproletariat as a constitutive other of modernity insofar as they cannot substantially participate in the public culture of modern public transport. Third, in order to maintain its hegemony, modern culture disciplines the lumpenproletariat into becoming modern subjects by using the public space of modern public transport as a disciplinary technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代性、霸权与公共交通作为公共空间:解读阿尔弗雷德Döblin的柏林亚历山大广场
摘要:本文通过阅读阿尔弗雷德Döblin的《柏林亚历山大广场》,探讨公共交通作为一种公共空间如何成为一种学科技术。首先,本文认为,现代主体性至少在一定程度上是通过作为公共空间的公共交通来表达的。其次,文章概述了在公共交通作为公共空间中形成的现代性概念如何需要将工人阶级定义为现代性的构成他者,因为他们不能实质性地参与现代公共交通的公共文化。第三,现代文化为了维护自己的霸权地位,利用现代公共交通的公共空间作为一种规训技术,将流氓无产阶级规训为现代主体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
期刊最新文献
Bataille at the Limit of Rapture and Rigor The City as an Archive of Doing and Undoing: The Case of Istanbul's Atatürk Cultural Center The Things of Order: Affect, Material Culture, Dispositif Ambivalent Attachments: Queer and Trans Histories of Lesbian Feminism The Aesthetics of Social Reproduction: Silences in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and Octavia Butler's Parable of the Sower
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1