Can (or should) white women do Black feminist theory?: exploring tensions, contradictions, and intersectionalities while performing justice-focused research

Q3 Social Sciences Leisure/Loisir Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.1080/14927713.2022.2141835
Alayna Schmidt, C. Outley, C. Schultz
{"title":"Can (or should) white women do Black feminist theory?: exploring tensions, contradictions, and intersectionalities while performing justice-focused research","authors":"Alayna Schmidt, C. Outley, C. Schultz","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2022.2141835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Black feminist thought is produced by and for Black women, but could it be applied by – be the conceptual lens for – others? How do/should I position myself as a white woman doing Black feminist work? How do I de-centre myself, centre Black voices, and also use the power that my whiteness provides to do the type of social justice work Black feminist thought approaches demands? Here, I wrestle with the answers to these questions mainly through my ‘conversations’ with Black feminist intellectuals such as Collins (2000), Lorde (2007), Cooper (2018), and Kendall (2020). In this reflective piece, I explore six ‘lessons learned’ which emerged from the tensions/conflicts I encountered while doing this project in the confines of academia with the goal of considering how academics and practitioners can create knowledge in anti-racist ways.","PeriodicalId":18056,"journal":{"name":"Leisure/Loisir","volume":"82 1","pages":"101 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leisure/Loisir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2022.2141835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Black feminist thought is produced by and for Black women, but could it be applied by – be the conceptual lens for – others? How do/should I position myself as a white woman doing Black feminist work? How do I de-centre myself, centre Black voices, and also use the power that my whiteness provides to do the type of social justice work Black feminist thought approaches demands? Here, I wrestle with the answers to these questions mainly through my ‘conversations’ with Black feminist intellectuals such as Collins (2000), Lorde (2007), Cooper (2018), and Kendall (2020). In this reflective piece, I explore six ‘lessons learned’ which emerged from the tensions/conflicts I encountered while doing this project in the confines of academia with the goal of considering how academics and practitioners can create knowledge in anti-racist ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人女性能(或应该)做黑人女性主义理论吗?:在进行以正义为中心的研究时,探索紧张、矛盾和交叉性
黑人女权主义思想是由黑人女性产生的,也是为黑人女性而产生的,但它能被其他人应用吗?作为一名从事黑人女权主义工作的白人女性,我应该如何定位自己?我如何去中心化自己,去中心化黑人的声音,同时利用我的白人身份所提供的力量去做黑人女权主义思想所要求的社会正义工作?在这里,我主要通过与柯林斯(2000年)、洛德(2007年)、库珀(2018年)和肯德尔(2020年)等黑人女权主义知识分子的“对话”来寻找这些问题的答案。在这篇反思文章中,我探讨了从我在学术界范围内做这个项目时遇到的紧张/冲突中产生的六个“经验教训”,目的是考虑学者和从业者如何以反种族主义的方式创造知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leisure/Loisir
Leisure/Loisir Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Beyond the big five: a 10-year longitudinal study of personality traits predicting leisure-time physical activity among adults Youth homeless shelter staff perceptions of a mobile recreation programme Exploring resource-providing vacation activities and recovery experiences: a study in the context of Goa Research ethics = You + me + “All our relations” On the blood of others: re-visiting how “health” happens in interdisciplinary scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1