Learning to live together in polarized and pluralistic societies: Hong Kong teachers' views of democratic values versus patriotic values

Q3 Social Sciences Citizenship Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1386/ctl_00012_1
K. Wong, C. Lee
{"title":"Learning to live together in polarized and pluralistic societies: Hong Kong teachers' views of democratic values versus patriotic values","authors":"K. Wong, C. Lee","doi":"10.1386/ctl_00012_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Under 'One Country, Two Systems', 'good citizens' ‐ as supported by pro-democratic positions ‐ and 'good citizens' ‐ as promoted by the Chinese government ‐ are seemingly in contradiction with each another based on their values and ideologies\n in Hong Kong. The competing values of citizenship are demonstrated by deep divisions within Hong Kong society, with pro-democratic groups advocating democratic values and initiating societal transformation, and their pro-establishment counterparts highlighting patriotic values and sustaining\n the status quo. From an educational perspective, teachers take on an essential role in the implementation of education policies designed to cultivate students who are 'good citizens'. This research employed a mixed-methods approach to examine Hong Kong teachers' perceptions of 'good citizens'\n based on their affinity with democratic and patriotic values. The findings indicated that rather than conflicting, patriotic values tended to be complementary to democratic values. Moreover, critical patriotic citizens with multiple identities who participate rationally and constructively\n in social and political activities might be more likely to facilitate democratic development in Hong Kong. These findings have implications for policy-makers responsible for the citizenship education and preparation of future citizens living within polarized and pluralistic societies, and\n they highlight the value of learning to live together in a complex world.","PeriodicalId":38020,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00012_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Under 'One Country, Two Systems', 'good citizens' ‐ as supported by pro-democratic positions ‐ and 'good citizens' ‐ as promoted by the Chinese government ‐ are seemingly in contradiction with each another based on their values and ideologies in Hong Kong. The competing values of citizenship are demonstrated by deep divisions within Hong Kong society, with pro-democratic groups advocating democratic values and initiating societal transformation, and their pro-establishment counterparts highlighting patriotic values and sustaining the status quo. From an educational perspective, teachers take on an essential role in the implementation of education policies designed to cultivate students who are 'good citizens'. This research employed a mixed-methods approach to examine Hong Kong teachers' perceptions of 'good citizens' based on their affinity with democratic and patriotic values. The findings indicated that rather than conflicting, patriotic values tended to be complementary to democratic values. Moreover, critical patriotic citizens with multiple identities who participate rationally and constructively in social and political activities might be more likely to facilitate democratic development in Hong Kong. These findings have implications for policy-makers responsible for the citizenship education and preparation of future citizens living within polarized and pluralistic societies, and they highlight the value of learning to live together in a complex world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习在两极化和多元社会中共同生活:香港教师对民主价值观与爱国价值观的看法
在“一国两制”下,“好公民”——由亲民主立场所支持——和“好公民”——由中国政府所提倡——基于他们在香港的价值观和意识形态,似乎是相互矛盾的。香港社会内部的深刻分歧体现了公民价值观的竞争,亲民主团体倡导民主价值观,发起社会转型,而亲建制派则强调爱国价值观,维持现状。从教育的角度来看,教师在实施旨在培养学生成为“好公民”的教育政策方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究采用混合方法研究香港教师对“好公民”的看法,基于他们对民主和爱国价值观的亲和力。调查结果表明,爱国价值观往往与民主价值观相辅相成,而不是相互冲突。此外,具有多重身份的批判性爱国公民理性和建设性地参与社会和政治活动,可能更有可能促进香港的民主发展。这些发现对负责公民教育和培养生活在两极分化和多元化社会中的未来公民的政策制定者具有启示意义,它们突出了学习在复杂世界中共同生活的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Citizenship Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Citizenship Teaching & Learning is published in partnership with the Children’s Identity and Citizenship in Europe Association (CiCea). Citizenship Teaching & Learning is global in scope, exploring issues of social and moral responsibility, community involvement and political literacy. It is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal that advances academic and professional understandings within a broad characterization of education, focusing on a wide range of issues including identity, diversity, equality and social justice within social, moral, political and cultural contexts.
期刊最新文献
Relationships among teachers’ emotional competences, emotional labour strategies and self-efficacy in moral and character education: A Hong Kong case Transdisciplinary reflections on the occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968: Didactic use of the protest song in social science education Curriculum for Justice and Harmony: Deliberation, Knowledge, and Action in Social and Civic Education, Keith C. Barton And Li-Ching Ho (2022) Bilingual digital learning in teacher education: Bridge or barrier in the enhancement of shared society? Gender context matters: The hidden gender equality problem of school democracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1