Seismic noise to public health signal: investigating the effects of pandemic guidance in Mexico

IF 1 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1080/25729861.2022.2086446
Abril Saldaña-Tejeda, X. Pérez‐Campos, E.Harish Reddy
{"title":"Seismic noise to public health signal: investigating the effects of pandemic guidance in Mexico","authors":"Abril Saldaña-Tejeda, X. Pérez‐Campos, E.Harish Reddy","doi":"10.1080/25729861.2022.2086446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Understanding public activities and developing thoughtful public health strategies are key goals in efforts to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explores how seismic noise data can be used as part of such efforts. We show that the fluctuation of seismic noise levels has the capacity to demonstrate aggregate human movement. When considered in relation to major public health efforts, these data can help us evaluate the effectiveness of public health communication strategies that seek to limit social activity. We show evidence that, broadly speaking, Mexican national efforts to encourage “lockdown” worked for a few months in areas around seismic stations, and broke down as time went on. Further, we suggest that changes in the levels of human activity detected in seismic noise can be read alongside social data that provide some clues as to why people respond or not to health recommendations. Our findings have implications for both efforts to understand the nature and effects of public trust in the Mexican state and also the practicalities of using seismic noise data in this manner. An interdisciplinary analysis allows us to address these data and their possible use in a way that takes seriously the opportunities and challenges that emerge in the context of contemporary biopolitics and emerging configurations of surveillance technologies. Analyzing anthropogenic seismic activity opens up new opportunities for ethical data collection and use.","PeriodicalId":36898,"journal":{"name":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2086446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding public activities and developing thoughtful public health strategies are key goals in efforts to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explores how seismic noise data can be used as part of such efforts. We show that the fluctuation of seismic noise levels has the capacity to demonstrate aggregate human movement. When considered in relation to major public health efforts, these data can help us evaluate the effectiveness of public health communication strategies that seek to limit social activity. We show evidence that, broadly speaking, Mexican national efforts to encourage “lockdown” worked for a few months in areas around seismic stations, and broke down as time went on. Further, we suggest that changes in the levels of human activity detected in seismic noise can be read alongside social data that provide some clues as to why people respond or not to health recommendations. Our findings have implications for both efforts to understand the nature and effects of public trust in the Mexican state and also the practicalities of using seismic noise data in this manner. An interdisciplinary analysis allows us to address these data and their possible use in a way that takes seriously the opportunities and challenges that emerge in the context of contemporary biopolitics and emerging configurations of surveillance technologies. Analyzing anthropogenic seismic activity opens up new opportunities for ethical data collection and use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震噪声对公共卫生信号的影响:调查墨西哥大流行指导的影响
了解公共活动和制定周到的公共卫生战略是管理COVID-19大流行的关键目标。本文探讨了如何将地震噪声数据用作此类工作的一部分。我们表明,地震噪声水平的波动有能力证明人类的聚集运动。当考虑到与主要公共卫生工作的关系时,这些数据可以帮助我们评估寻求限制社会活动的公共卫生传播战略的有效性。我们提供的证据表明,总的来说,墨西哥国家鼓励“封锁”的努力在地震台站周围地区发挥了几个月的作用,但随着时间的推移,这些努力失败了。此外,我们建议,从地震噪声中检测到的人类活动水平的变化可以与社会数据一起解读,这些数据可以提供一些线索,说明人们为什么会对健康建议做出反应或不做出反应。我们的研究结果对理解墨西哥国家公众信任的性质和影响的努力以及以这种方式使用地震噪声数据的实用性都有影响。跨学科分析使我们能够以一种认真对待当代生物政治和新兴监测技术配置背景下出现的机遇和挑战的方式处理这些数据及其可能的用途。分析人为地震活动为伦理数据的收集和使用开辟了新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
What expertise, for what, and whose democratic politics? The Oxford handbook of expertise and democratic politics , edited by Gil Eyal and Thomas Medvetz, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 2023, 592 pp., US $165 (hardback), ISBN: 9780190848927 Disposability, social security, and the facts of work in Nicaragua’s sugarcane zone Merchandising doubt in the periphery: some lessons from the glyphosate debate in Colombia Energy sovereignty storytelling: Art practices, community-led transitions, and territorial futures in Latin America Routledge handbook of the digital environmental humanities Routledge handbook of the digital environmental humanities , edited by C. Travis, D. P. Dixon, L. Bergmann, R. Legg, and A. Crampsie, London, Taylor & Francis, 2022, 556 pp., USD$216.00(hardback), ISBN 9780367536633
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1