Experiments on the Electron Impact Excitation of Hydrogen Molecules Indicate the Presence of the Second Flavor of Hydrogen Atoms

E. Oks
{"title":"Experiments on the Electron Impact Excitation of Hydrogen Molecules Indicate the Presence of the Second Flavor of Hydrogen Atoms","authors":"E. Oks","doi":"10.3390/foundations2030047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In one of our previous papers, we performed a comparative analysis of the experimental and theoretical cross-sections for the excitation of atomic hydrogen by electrons. We found that the theoretical ratio of the cross-section σ2s of the excitation of the state 2s to the cross-section σ2p of the excitation of the state 2p was systematically higher than the corresponding experimental ratio by about 20% (far beyond the experimental error margins). We showed that this discrepancy can be due to the presence of the Second Flavor of Hydrogen Atoms (SFHA) in the experimental gas and that the share of the SFHA in the mixture, required for removing this discrepancy, was about the same as the share of the usual hydrogen atoms. The theory behind the SFHA was based on the standard quantum mechanics—on the second solution of the Dirac equation for hydrogen atoms—and on the experimental fact that the charge distribution inside the proton has the peak at the center of the proton; the term “flavor” was used by the analogy with flavors of quarks. In the present paper, we used the same guiding principles, as employed in that previous study, for the comparative analysis of the experimental and theoretical cross-sections for the excitation of molecular hydrogen by electrons. We found that presumably the most sophisticated calculations, using the convergent close-coupling method involving 491 states, very significantly underestimate the corresponding experimental cross-sections for the two lowest stable triplet states. We showed that if in some hydrogen molecules one or both atoms would be the SFHA, then the above very significant discrepancy could be eliminated. We estimated that it would take such unusual hydrogen molecules to be represented in the experimental gas by the share of about 0.26. This is just by about 40% smaller than the share 0.45 of the SFHA deduced in our previous analysis of the experiment on the electron impact excitation of hydrogen atoms (rather than hydrogen molecules). It should be emphasized that from the theoretical point of view, the share of the unusual hydrogen molecules in any experimental gas and the share of the unusual hydrogen atoms (SFHA) in any experimental gas should not be expected to coincide (it would be the comparison of “apples to oranges”, rather than “apples to apples”). In addition, given the roughness of the above estimates, we can state that the results of the present paper reinforce the main conclusion of our previous papers of the very significant share of the SFHA in the experimental hydrogen gases. Thus, the experiments on the electron impact excitation of hydrogen molecules are the fourth type of atomic experiments that proved the existence of the SFHA.","PeriodicalId":81291,"journal":{"name":"Foundations","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations2030047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In one of our previous papers, we performed a comparative analysis of the experimental and theoretical cross-sections for the excitation of atomic hydrogen by electrons. We found that the theoretical ratio of the cross-section σ2s of the excitation of the state 2s to the cross-section σ2p of the excitation of the state 2p was systematically higher than the corresponding experimental ratio by about 20% (far beyond the experimental error margins). We showed that this discrepancy can be due to the presence of the Second Flavor of Hydrogen Atoms (SFHA) in the experimental gas and that the share of the SFHA in the mixture, required for removing this discrepancy, was about the same as the share of the usual hydrogen atoms. The theory behind the SFHA was based on the standard quantum mechanics—on the second solution of the Dirac equation for hydrogen atoms—and on the experimental fact that the charge distribution inside the proton has the peak at the center of the proton; the term “flavor” was used by the analogy with flavors of quarks. In the present paper, we used the same guiding principles, as employed in that previous study, for the comparative analysis of the experimental and theoretical cross-sections for the excitation of molecular hydrogen by electrons. We found that presumably the most sophisticated calculations, using the convergent close-coupling method involving 491 states, very significantly underestimate the corresponding experimental cross-sections for the two lowest stable triplet states. We showed that if in some hydrogen molecules one or both atoms would be the SFHA, then the above very significant discrepancy could be eliminated. We estimated that it would take such unusual hydrogen molecules to be represented in the experimental gas by the share of about 0.26. This is just by about 40% smaller than the share 0.45 of the SFHA deduced in our previous analysis of the experiment on the electron impact excitation of hydrogen atoms (rather than hydrogen molecules). It should be emphasized that from the theoretical point of view, the share of the unusual hydrogen molecules in any experimental gas and the share of the unusual hydrogen atoms (SFHA) in any experimental gas should not be expected to coincide (it would be the comparison of “apples to oranges”, rather than “apples to apples”). In addition, given the roughness of the above estimates, we can state that the results of the present paper reinforce the main conclusion of our previous papers of the very significant share of the SFHA in the experimental hydrogen gases. Thus, the experiments on the electron impact excitation of hydrogen molecules are the fourth type of atomic experiments that proved the existence of the SFHA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢分子的电子冲击激发实验表明氢原子的第二味存在
在我们之前的一篇论文中,我们对氢原子被电子激发的实验截面和理论截面进行了比较分析。我们发现2s态激发态截面σ2s与2p态激发态截面σ2p的理论比值系统地高于相应的实验比值约20%(远远超出实验误差范围)。我们表明,这种差异可能是由于实验气体中存在第二味氢原子(SFHA),并且消除这种差异所需的混合物中SFHA的份额与通常氢原子的份额大致相同。SFHA背后的理论是基于标准量子力学——氢原子狄拉克方程的第二解——以及质子内部电荷分布在质子中心有峰值的实验事实;“味道”一词是用夸克的味道来类比的。在这篇论文中,我们使用了与先前研究中相同的指导原则,对分子氢被电子激发的实验和理论截面进行了比较分析。我们发现,可能是最复杂的计算,使用涉及491个状态的收敛紧密耦合方法,非常显著地低估了两个最低稳定三重态的相应实验截面。我们表明,如果在一些氢分子中,一个或两个原子都是SFHA,那么上述非常显著的差异可以消除。我们估计,这种不寻常的氢分子在实验气体中所占的比例约为0.26。这比我们在之前对氢原子(而不是氢分子)的电子撞击激发实验的分析中推断出的0.45的SFHA份额小了大约40%。应该强调的是,从理论的角度来看,任何实验气体中不寻常氢分子的比例和任何实验气体中不寻常氢原子(SFHA)的比例不应该是一致的(这将是“苹果与橘子”的比较,而不是“苹果与苹果”的比较)。此外,考虑到上述估计的粗糙性,我们可以说,本论文的结果加强了我们以前论文的主要结论,即SFHA在实验氢气中占有非常重要的份额。因此,氢分子的电子冲击激发实验是证明SFHA存在的第四类原子实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generalized Quasilinearization Method for Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Initial Conditions with Applications Effects of Colored Noise in the Dynamic Motions and Conformational Exploration of Enzymes On the Algebraic Geometry of Multiview Characterization of the Solution Properties of Sodium Dodecylsulphate Containing Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer Flooding Media Classifying Sets of Type (4,n) in PG(3,q)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1